Improving treatment of patients with psychosis in low-and-middle-income countries in Southeast Europe: Results from a hybrid effectiveness-implementation, pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial (IMPULSE).

BACKGROUND: In Southeast Europe (SEE) standard treatment of patients with psychosis is largely based on pharmacotherapy with psychosocial interventions rarely available. DIALOG+ is a digital psychosocial intervention designed to make routine care therapeutically effective. This trial simultaneously examined effectiveness of DIALOG+ versus standard care on clinical and social outcomes (Aim 1) and explored intervention fidelity (Aim 2). METHODS: A hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation, cluster-randomized trial was conducted in five SEE countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo*, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia. The intervention was offered to patients six times across 12 months instead of routine care. The outcomes were subjective quality of life (primary), clinical symptoms, satisfaction with services, and economic costs. Intervention fidelity was operationalized as adherence to the protocol in terms of frequency, duration, content, and coverage. Data were analyzed using multilevel regression. RESULTS: A total of 81 clinicians and 468 patients with psychosis were randomized to DIALOG+ or standard care. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity. The average number of delivered sessions was 5.5 (SD = 2.3) across 12 months. Patients in the intervention arm had better quality of life (MANSA) at 6 months (p = 0.03). No difference was found for other outcomes at 6 months. Due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, 12-month data were not interpretable. CONCLUSIONS: DIALOG+ improved subjective quality of life of individuals with psychosis at 6 months (after four sessions), albeit with small effect size. The intervention has the potential to contribute to holistic care of patients with psychosis.

Use of high-dose cytarabine to enhance cisplatin cytotoxicity-effects on the response and overall survival rates of advanced head and neck cancer patients.

UNLABELLED: It has been reported that cytarabine, acting by at least two different mechanisms, enhances the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin in in vitro systems. The aim of this open, prospective, randomised study was to estimate the eventual benefits from the inclusion of high-dose cytarabine in the cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen as first-line treatment of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. The study recruited successive patients with unresectable grade I/II head and neck cancer who were not suitable for irradiation treatment (T any N3 or T4 N2C), metastatic or previously irradiated. All patients gave their informed consent. A joint ear, nose and throat (ENT) oncological committee performed the selection. A total of 170 patients were included in the study. Patients randomised to arm A were given 1000 mg/m(2) cytarabine on day 1 preceding for 6 h cisplatin infusion, 30 mg/m(2)/24 h cisplatin intravenous (i.v.) bolus days 1-4 and 1000 mg/m(2)/24 h 5-FU in a 4-h infusion on days 1-4. Patients in arm B were given cisplatin and 5-FU in the same dosage and schedule as in arm A. Additional irradiation+/-surgery was performed if and when feasible. Patients in both arms were well balanced with regard to clinical variables. The following results were obtained: Arm A: 84 patients were included, 74 were evaluable for activity; RESPONSE: complete response (CR) 8 (11%), partial response (PR) 40 (54%), stable disease (SD) 11 (15%), progressive disease (PD) 15 (20%). The overall response rate (RR) based on the evaluable patients was 48/74 (65%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 54-75%); The RR based on an intent-to-treat analysis was 57%, 95% CI 47-67%; Median survival was 13 months; There were 50 episodes of granulocytopenia grade IV and 15 of febrile neutropenia per 316 cycles. Arm B: 86 patients were included, 80 were evaluable for activity; RESPONSE: CR 7 (9%), PR 29 (36%), SD 10 (12.5%), PD 34 (42.5%); The overall RR based on the evaluable patients was 36/80 (45%, 95% CI 35-56%); The RR based on an intent-to-treat analysis was 42%, 95% CI 32-52%; Median survival was 8 months; There were 14 episodes of granulocytopenia grade IV and 7 febrile neutropenias per 324 cycles. The RR was significantly higher in arm A (P=0.013), power (one-sided) 80%. The proportion of patients from the appropriate subset who achieved a clinical response making additional treatment feasible was higher in arm A (P=0.00015), as well as the proportion of patients with a performance status 2+3 achieving a response (P<0.0001). Using the Log-rank test, patients from arm A achieved a significantly longer survival (P=0.009), with the probability of survival at 12 months of 0.58 for patients in arm A and 0.28 for patients in arm B. Grade IV granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were more frequent in arm A. Due to its haematological side-effects, cytarabine might not be the ideal drug to modulate the cytotoxicity of cisplatin. However, other modulators of its activity could be of interest for further studies in head and neck cancer patients.