Transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation relieves primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized, double-blind clinical study versus placebo.

INTRODUCTION: This randomized, crossover, double-blind, controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of a preprogrammed transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device versus placebo (SHAM) in women with primary dysmenorrhea (PD). MATERIAL: Forty women suffering from significant dysmenorrhea requiring the use of analgesics and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs self-apply to the abdominal or lumbar region depending on the location of the pain, alternately according to randomization, the TENS device then the SHAM (dummy device) or conversely SHAM then TENS. The primary endpoint compares the evolution of pain intensity before and after application of TENS and SHAM. The speed of action, the persistence of the analgesic effect and the therapeutic savings are also evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) are collected. RESULTS: A statistically and clinically significant decrease in the pain of 53% (P<0.0001) is observed during the first 2 applications of TENS versus no analgesic effect (-5%, P=0.318) with SHAM. Over all 197 applications of TENS, the reduction of menstrual pain intensity by more than half is confirmed. The rapid relief, less than 20 minutes in 74% of cases, lasts on average more than 7 hours. A difference in analgesic consumption of -93% is observed in favor of TENS (P<0.01). Seven participants reported 10 non-serious AEs, 2 of which were possibly related to TENS. CONCLUSION: The TENS device tested represents a well-tolerated, rapidly and lastingly effective non-pharmacological analgesic solution, capable of replacing or being combined with analgesics in the management of PD.

Vertebrobasilar ischemia after cervical spine manipulation: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: The most serious accidents after cervical spine manipulation are vertebrobasilar ischemia. Their incidence is underestimated. Their risk of apparition is lower if the contraindications are respected and if they are realised according to suitable practice. CASE REPORT: Mrs B, 39 years old, was an active smoker and had migraine for 10 years ago. One day, she presented an unusual headache associated with neck pain that was treated by a cervical spine manipulation. Seven hours after, she developed an alternate syndrome with a right sensory motor defect, a cerebellar syndrome, a pyramidal syndrome and a left defect of cranial nerves. The arteriography showed a thrombosis of the basilar trunk and a dissection of the left vertebral artery. A thrombolysis "in situ" was realized six hours and a half after the onset of the neurological defects. After eight months of rehabilitation, there were still a paralysis of the right upper limb, of the cranial nerves and a cerebellar syndrome but the patient was able to walk with two crutches and can eat by herself. DISCUSSION: Several risk factors were present in this case and there was also a major contraindication to manipulations: unusual acute occipital headache. Given the long period between the onset of neurological symptoms and the confirmation of the diagnosis, intravenous thrombolysis could not be done. Unfortunately, after eight months, important neurological sequels persisted. In order to avoid this type of accident after cervical manipulations, it is necessary to realize a strict medical examination and to implement the recommendations from the French society of manual and orthopaedic osteopathic medicine (Société française de médecine manuelle orthopédique et ostéopathique [SOFMMOO]).