Limb Injuries and Disability in the Southwest Region of Cameroon.

INTRODUCTION: Extremity injuries are a leading cause of morbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), often resulting in marked short-term and long-term disabilities. Most of the existing knowledge on these injuries originates from hospital-based studies; however, poor access to health care in LMICs limits these data because of inherent selection bias. This subanalysis of a larger population-level cross-sectional study in the Southwest Region of Cameroon aims to determine patterns of limb injury, treatment-seeking behaviors, and predictors of disability. METHODS: Households were surveyed in 2017 on injuries and subsequent disability sustained over the previous 12 months using a three-stage cluster sampling framework. Subgroups were compared using the chi square, Fisher exact, analysis of variance, Wald, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Logarithmic models were used to identify predictors of disability. RESULTS: Of 8,065 subjects, 335 persons (4.2%) sustained 363 isolated limb injuries. Over half of the isolated limb injuries (55.7%) were open wounds while 9.6% were fractures. Isolated limb injuries most commonly occurred in younger men and resulted from falls (24.3%) and road traffic injuries (23.5%). High rates of disability were reported, with 39% reporting difficulty with activities of daily living. Compared with individuals with other types of limb injuries, those with fractures were six times more likely to seek a traditional healer first for care (40% versus 6.7%), 5.3 times (95% CI, 1.21 to 23.42) more likely to have any level of disability after adjustment for injury mechanism, and 2.3 times more likely to have difficulty paying for food or rent (54.8% versus 23.7%). DISCUSSION: Most traumatic injuries sustained in LMICs involve limb injuries and often result in high levels of disability that affect individuals during their most productive years. Improved access to care and injury control measures, such as road safety training and improvements to transportation and trauma response infrastructure, are needed to reduce these injuries.

Thefeasibility, appropriateness, and applicability of trauma scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: About 5.8 million people die each year as a result of injuries, and nearly 90% of these deaths occur in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Trauma scoring is a cornerstone of trauma quality improvement (QI) efforts, and is key to organizing and evaluating trauma services. The objective of this review was to assess the appropriateness, feasibility, and QI applicability of traditional trauma scoring systems in LMIC settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and trauma-focused journals for articles describing the use of a standardized trauma scoring system to characterize holistic health status. Studies conducted in high-income countries (HIC) or describing scores for isolated anatomic locations were excluded. Data reporting a score's capacity to discriminate mortality, feasibility of implementation, or use for QI were extracted and synthesized. RESULTS: Of the 896 articles screened, 336 were included. Over half of studies (56%) reported Glasgow Coma Scale, followed by Injury Severity Score (ISS; 51%), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS; 24%), Revised Trauma Score (RTS; 19%), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS; 14%), and Kampala Trauma Score (7%). While ISS was overwhelmingly predictive of mortality, 12 articles reported limited feasibility of ISS and/or AIS. RTS consistently underestimated injury severity. Over a third of articles (37%) reporting TRISS assessmentsobserved mortality that was greater than that predicted by TRISS. Several articles cited limited human resources as the key challenge to feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review reveal that implementing systems designed for HICs may not be relevant to the burden and resources available in LMICs. Adaptations or alternative scoring systems may be more effective. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017064600.

A Qualitative Study of Transitions Between Health Care Settings After Injury in Cameroon.

BACKGROUND: Populations in Cameroon, a lower middle-income country in Central Africa, have a higher than average burden of traumatic injury, suffer from more severe injuries, and face substantial barriers to accessing formal health care services after injury. The aim of this study was to identify and describe how recently injured Cameroonians use and adapt the formal and informal medical systems and what motivates these transitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recently injured people or their surrogates residing in Southwest Region, Cameroon, were recruited from a larger community-based survey on injury. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 39 recently injured persons or their adult family members. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and iteratively coded to identify major themes. RESULTS: Most injured persons had complex therapeutic itineraries involving one or more transitions, and nine of 35 injured persons used formal care exclusively. Transitions away from formal care were driven by (1) anticipated costs beyond means, (2) unacceptable length of proposed treatment, (3) poorly supported referrals, (4) dissatisfaction with treatment progress or outcome, and (5) belief that traditional methods work additively with formal care. Factors motivating people to engage with formal care included (1) perceived high value of care for cost, (2) desire for reliable diagnostic tests, (3) social support during hospitalization, and (4) financial support from family or a stranger responsible for the injury. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight specific opportunities to improve engagement in formal care after injury and better support injured Cameroonians through the strengthening of the formal care referral process and health financing organization.

Correction to: Strengthening Surgery Strengthens Health Systems: A New Paradigm and Potential Pathway for Horizontal Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

In the original article, Ziad C. Sifri's first and last names were interchanged. It is correct as reflected here.

Strengthening Surgery Strengthens Health Systems: A New Paradigm and Potential Pathway for Horizontal Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Global health is transitioning toward a focus on building strong and sustainable health systems in developing countries; however, resources, funding, and agendas continue to concentrate on "vertical" (disease-based) improvements in care. Surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires the development of health systems infrastructure and can be considered an indicator of overall system readiness. Improving surgical care provides a scalable gateway to strengthen health systems in multiple domains. In this position paper by the Society of University Surgeons' Committee on Global Academic Surgery, we propose that health systems development appropriately falls within the purview of the academic surgeon. Partnerships between academic surgical institutions and societies from high-income and resource-constrained settings are needed to strengthen advocacy and funding efforts and support development of training and research in LMICs.