Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 114(1): 17-32, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heart failure management guidelines have been published, but the degree of adherence to these guidelines remains unknown. AIMS: To study in 2015 healthcare utilization and causes of death for people previously identified with heart failure. METHODS: The national health data system was used to identify adult general scheme (86% of the French population) hospitalized for heart failure between 2011 and 2014 or with only a long-term chronic disease allowance for heart failure. The frequency and median (interquartile range) of at least one healthcare use among those still alive in 2015 was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 499,296 adults (1.4% of the population) were included, and 429,853 were alive in 2015; median age 79 (68-86) years. At least one utilization was observed for a general practitioner in 95% of patients (median 8 [interquartile range 5-13] consultations), a cardiologist in 42% (2 [1-3]), a nurse in 78% (16 [4-100]), a loop diuretic in 64% (11 [8-12] dispensations), an aldosterone antagonist in 21% (8 [5-11]), a thiazide in 15% (7 [4-11]), a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in 68% (11 [8-13]), a beta-blocker in 65% (11 [7-13]), a beta-blocker plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor in 57%, and a beta-blocker plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor plus an aldosterone antagonist in 37%. Hospitalization for heart failure was present for 8% (1 [1,2]). Higher levels of healthcare utilization were observed in the presence of hospitalization for heart failure before 2015. Among the 13.9% of people who died in 2015, heart failure accounted for 8% of causes, cardiovascular disease accounted for 39%. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners and nurses are the main actors in the regular follow-up of patients with heart failure, whereas cardiologist consultations and dispensing of first-line treatments are insufficient with respect to guidelines.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Cardiologistas , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/normas , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Feminino , França , Clínicos Gerais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/normas , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades/normas , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem , Padrões de Prática Médica , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 109(6-7): 376-83, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020513

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whereas the coronary artery disease death rate has declined in high-income countries, the incidence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is increasing in sub-Saharan Africa, where their management remains a challenge. AIM: To propose a consensus statement to optimize management of ACS in sub-Saharan Africa on the basis of realistic considerations. METHODS: The AFRICARDIO-2 conference (Yamoussoukro, May 2015) reviewed the ongoing features of ACS in 10 sub-Saharan countries (Benin, Burkina-Faso, Congo-Brazzaville, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Togo), and analysed whether improvements in strategies and policies may be expected using readily available healthcare facilities. RESULTS: The outcome of patients with ACS is affected by clearly identified factors, including: delay to reaching first medical contact, achieving effective hospital transportation, increased time from symptom onset to reperfusion therapy, limited primary emergency facilities (especially in rural areas) and emergency medical service (EMS) prehospital management, and hence limited numbers of patients eligible for myocardial reperfusion (thrombolytic therapy and/or percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]). With only five catheterization laboratories in the 10 participating countries, PCI rates are very low. However, in recent years, catheterization laboratories have been built in referral cardiology departments in large African towns (Abidjan and Dakar). Improvements in patient care and outcomes should target limited but selected objectives: increasing awareness and recognition of ACS symptoms; education of rural-based healthcare professionals; and developing and managing a network between first-line healthcare facilities in rural areas or small cities, emergency rooms in larger towns, the EMS, hospital-based cardiology departments and catheterization laboratories. CONCLUSION: Faced with the increasing prevalence of ACS in sub-Saharan Africa, healthcare policies should be developed to overcome the multiple shortcomings blunting optimal management. European and/or North American management guidelines should be adapted to African specificities. Our consensus statement aims to optimize patient management on the basis of realistic considerations, given the healthcare facilities, organizations and few cardiology teams that are available.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Países em Desenvolvimento , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Terapia Trombolítica , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , África Subsaariana/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Consenso , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Incidência , Avaliação das Necessidades/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/normas , Prevalência , Terapia Trombolítica/normas , Tempo para o Tratamento/organização & administração , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 108(11): 576-88, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26433733

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed the cost of treatment of chronic angina pectoris, especially in European countries. AIM: To determine, using a modeling approach, the cost of care in 2012 for 1year of treatment of patients with stable angina, according to four therapeutic options: optimal medical therapy (OMT); percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stent (PCI-BMS); PCI with drug-eluting stent (PCI-DES); and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). METHODS: Six different clinical scenarios that could occur over 1year were defined: clinical success; recurrence of symptoms without hospitalization; myocardial infarction (MI); subsequent revascularization; death from non-cardiac cause; and cardiac death. The probability of a patient being in one of the six clinical scenarios, according to the therapeutic options used, was determined from a literature search. A direct medical cost for each of the therapeutic options was calculated from the perspective of French statutory health insurance. RESULTS: The annual costs per patient for each strategy, according to their efficacy results, were, in our models, €1567 with OMT, €5908 with PCI-BMS, €6623 with PCI-DES and €16,612 with CABG. These costs were significantly different (P<0.05). A part of these costs was related to management of complications (recurrence of symptoms, MI and death) during the year (between 3% and 38% depending on the therapeutic options studied); this part of the expenditure was lowest with the CABG therapeutic option. CONCLUSION: OMT appears to be the least costly option, and, if reasonable from a clinical point of view, might achieve appreciable savings in health expenditure.


Assuntos
Angina Estável/economia , Angina Estável/terapia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/economia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Modelos Econômicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Idoso , Angina Estável/diagnóstico , Angina Estável/mortalidade , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Causas de Morte , Doença Crônica , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos , Stents Farmacológicos/economia , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Metais/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Desenho de Prótese , Recidiva , Stents/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 107(3): 158-68, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24662470

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: National population-based management and outcome data for patients of all ages hospitalized for heart failure have rarely been reported. AIM: National population-based management and outcome of patients of all ages hospitalized for heart failure have rarely been reported. The present study reports these results, based on 77% of the French population, for patients hospitalized for the first time for heart failure in 2009. METHODS: The study population comprised French national health insurance general scheme beneficiaries hospitalized in 2009 with a principal diagnosis of heart failure, after exclusion of those hospitalized for heart failure between 2006 and 2008 or with a chronic disease status for heart failure. Data were collected from the national health insurance information system (SNIIRAM). RESULTS: A total of 69,958 patients (mean age, 78 years; 48% men) were studied. The hospital mortality rate was 6.4%, with 1-month, 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 89%, 71% and 60%, respectively. Heart failure and all-cause readmission-free rates were 55% and 43% at 1 year and 27% and 17% at 2 years, respectively. Compared with a reference sample of 600,000 subjects, the age- and sex-standardized relative risk of death was 29 (95% confidence interval [CI] 28-29) at 2 years, 82 (95% CI 72-94) in subjects aged<50 years and 3 (95% CI 3-3) in subjects aged ≥ 90 years. For subjects aged < 70 years who survived 1 month after discharge, factors associated with a reduction in the 2-year mortality rate were: female sex; age < 55 years; absence of co-morbidities; and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering agents or oral anticoagulants during the month following discharge. Poor prognostic factors were treatment with a loop diuretic before or after hospitalization and readmission for heart failure within 1 month after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based study confirms the severe prognosis of heart failure and the need to promote the use of effective medications and management designed to improve survival.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hospitalização , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiologia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Causas de Morte , Comorbidade , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Seguimentos , França/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Fatores de Risco , Inibidores de Simportadores de Cloreto de Sódio e Potássio/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 106(12): 680-9, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24239052

RESUMO

Cardiovascular mortality has decreased over the past 25 years, largely because of acute coronary syndrome care and preventive actions. Nevertheless, the rate of coronary heart disease remains high, with an annual risk of 4.7% (cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke). Cardiovascular risk factor management must be a priority in primary and secondary prevention, to improve the prognosis of this severe disease, in which absence of symptoms does not mean benignity. The current goals of therapeutic patient education are smoking cessation, regular physical activity, a cardioprotective (Mediterranean) diet, management of stress, good treatment adherence (which improves compliance), judicious use of the care system and help with occupational reintegration. Current and future programmes must be in accordance with the Haute Autorité de Santé recommendations published in 2007.


Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Prevenção Primária/educação , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Prevenção Secundária/educação , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/fisiopatologia , Dieta Mediterrânea , Humanos , Atividade Motora , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Cooperação do Paciente , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Estresse Psicológico/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA