Tinnitus and Its Association With Mental Health and Health-Related Quality of Life in an Older Population: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.

This study investigated the relationship of tinnitus with mental health and health-related quality of life (QoL) in older people. Data source included 5,129 community-dwelling men and women ≥60 years old from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Tinnitus was categorized into three groups: normal, tolerable tinnitus, and annoying tinnitus. Mental health and health-related QoL were assessed according to three dimensions (depressive mood, psychological distress, and suicidal ideation) and five domains (impaired mobility, impaired self-care, impaired usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of mental health and health-related QoL were calculated using multiple logistic regression analyses. Annoying tinnitus was positively and independently associated with deteriorated mental health and health-related QoL, suggesting comprehensive care is needed in older people with annoying tinnitus.

Corrigendum: Supplementary Effect of Choline Alfoscerate on Speech Recognition in Patients With Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Prospective Study in 34 Patients (57 Ears).

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.684519.].

Supplementary Effect of Choline Alfoscerate on Speech Recognition in Patients With Age-Related Hearing Loss: A Prospective Study in 34 Patients (57 Ears).

To investigate the effect of choline alfoscerate (CA) on hearing amplification in patients with age related hearing loss, we performed a prospective case-control observational study from March 2016 to September 2020. We assessed patients with bilateral word recognition score (WRS) <50% using monosyllabic words. The patients were 65-85 years old, without any history of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, parkinsonism, or depression. After enrollment, all patients started using hearing aids (HA). The CA group received a daily dose of 800 mg CA for 11 months. We performed between-group comparisons of audiological data, including pure tone audiometry, WRS, HA fitting data obtained using real-ear measurement (REM), and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid benefit scores after treatment. After CA administration, the WRS improved significantly in the CA group (4.2 ± 8.3%), but deteriorated in the control group (-0.6 ± 8.1%, p = 0.035). However, there was no significant between-group difference in the change in pure tone thresholds and aided speech intelligibility index calculated from REM. These findings suggest that the difference in WRS was relevant to central speech understanding rather than peripheral audibility. Therefore, administering oral CA could effectively enrich listening comprehension in older HA users.

Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Electroacoustic Stimulation Rehabilitation in Children With Limited Low-Frequency Hearing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical feasibility and auditory benefits of hearing rehabilitation using electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) after cochlear implantation (CI) and to identify the predictive factors for successful EAS rehabilitation in children with limited low-frequency hearing. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Seventeen children (21 ears) under the age of 15 years with residual low-frequency hearing who underwent CI using hearing preservation techniques. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent CI using hearing preservation techniques, and the postoperative audiograms were obtained to evaluate the hearing preservation rate. EAS rehabilitation was applied in patients with successful low-frequency hearing preservation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvements in speech perception in both quiet and noise conditions were compared between the EAS mode and the CI-only mode. The predictive factors for successful EAS rehabilitation in children were analyzed. RESULTS: Functional low-frequency residual hearing less than or equal to 85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz was achieved postoperatively in six of 21 ears, and successful EAS rehabilitation was possible in nine of 21 ears. Better speech perception scores were observed in quiet conditions using the EAS mode compared with the CI-only mode, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Significantly, better scores were observed in noise conditions with the EAS mode compared with the CI-only mode. Postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average was the only significant predictive factor of successful EAS rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: CI surgery using hearing preservation techniques with EAS rehabilitation should be performed in children, even in patients with limited residual hearing, to improve auditory outcomes.