Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 13(3): 364-70, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26871879

RESUMO

RATIONALE: We previously showed that the choice of levofloxacin or moxifloxacin for the treatment of patients with fluoroquinolone-sensitive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) did not affect sputum culture conversion at 3 months of treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare final treatment outcomes between patients with MDR-TB randomized to levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. METHODS: A total of 151 participants with MDR-TB who were included for the final analysis in our previous trial were followed through the end of treatment. Treatment outcomes were compared between 77 patients in the levofloxacin group and 74 in the moxifloxacin group, based on the 2008 World Health Organization definitions as well as 2013 revised definitions of treatment outcomes. In addition, the time to culture conversion was compared between the two groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Treatment outcomes were not different between the two groups, based on 2008 World Health Organization definitions as well as 2013 definitions. With 2008 definitions, cure was achieved in 54 patients (70.1%) in the levofloxacin group and 54 (73.0%) in the moxifloxacin group (P = 0.72). Treatment success rates, including cure and treatment completed, were not different between the two groups (87.0 vs. 81.1%, P = 0.38). With 2013 definitions, cure rates (83.1 vs. 78.4%, P = 0.54) and treatment success rates (84.4 vs. 79.7%, P = 0.53) were also similar between the levofloxacin and moxifloxacin groups. Time to culture conversion was also not different between the two groups (27.0 vs. 45.0 d, P = 0.11 on liquid media; 17.0 vs. 42.0 d, P = 0.14 on solid media). Patients in the levofloxacin group had more adverse events than those in the moxifloxacin group (79.2 vs. 63.5%, P = 0.03), especially musculoskeletal ones (37.7 vs. 14.9%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of levofloxacin or moxifloxacin made no difference to the final treatment outcome among patients with fluoroquinolone-sensitive MDR-TB. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicalrials.gov (NCT01055145).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Fluoroquinolonas/administração & dosagem , Levofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Levofloxacino/efeitos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Moxifloxacina , Análise Multivariada , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , República da Coreia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 188(7): 858-64, 2013 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23927582

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Levofloxacin (LFX) and moxifloxacin (MXF) are the two most frequently recommended fluoroquinolones for treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, studies comparing the effectiveness of LFX and MXF among patients with MDR-TB are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of LFX and MXF in terms of culture conversion after 3 months of treatment for MDR-TB. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter randomized open label trial, we randomly assigned 182 patients with MDR-TB (sensitive to LFX and MXF) to receive either LFX (750 mg/day; 90 patients) or MXF (400 mg/day; 92 patients) with a background drug regimen. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved sputum culture conversion at 3 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes were time to culture conversion and time to smear conversion, with data censored at 3 months, and the proportions of adverse drug reactions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At 3 months of treatment, 68 (88.3%) of the 77 patients in the LFX group and 67 (90.5%) of the 74 in the MXF group showed conversion to negative sputum cultures (odds ratio for LFX compared with MXF, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.20). Adverse drug reactions were reported in six patients (7.7%) in the LFX group and four (5.2%) in the MXF group (P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of LFX or MXF for treatment of patients with MDR-TB may not affect sputum culture conversion at 3 months of treatment. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01055145).


Assuntos
Compostos Aza/uso terapêutico , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Aza/administração & dosagem , Compostos Aza/farmacologia , Fluoroquinolonas , Humanos , Levofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Levofloxacino/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Moxifloxacina , Estudos Prospectivos , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/farmacologia , República da Coreia , Escarro/efeitos dos fármacos , Escarro/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA