A Review of Integrative Medicine in Gynaecological Oncology.

In recent years complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increasingly been the focus of international research. Numerous subsidised trials (7903) and systematic reviews (651) have been published, and the evidence is starting to be integrated into treatment guidelines. However, due to insufficient evidence and/or insufficient good quality evidence, this has mostly not translated to practice recommendations in reviews by the Cochrane collaboration gynaecology group. There is nevertheless a not insignificant number of CAM providers and users. The percentage of oncology patients who use CAM varies between 5 and 90 %. Doctors have been identified as the main providers of CAM. Half of gynaecologists offer CAM because of personal conviction or on suggestion from colleagues. This must be viewed in a critical light, since CAM is mostly practiced without appropriate training, often without sufficient evidence for a given method - and where evidence exists, practice guidelines are lacking - and lack of safety or efficacy testing. The combination of patient demand and lucrativeness for doctors/alternative medicine practitioners, both based on supposed effectiveness CAM, often leads to its indiscriminate use with uncertain outcomes and significant cost for patients. On the other hand there is published, positive level I evidence for a number of CAM treatment forms. The aim of this article is therefore to review the available evidence for CAM in gynaecological oncology practice. The continued need for research is highlighted, as is the need to integrate practices supported by good evidence into conventional gynaecological oncology.

Local and Systemic Therapies for Breast Cancer Patients: Reducing Short-term Symptoms with the Methods of Integrative Medicine.

With improved prognosis due to advances in the diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer, physicians and therapists now focus on aspects such as quality of life and the management of side effects from breast cancer treatment. Therapy- and disease-related side effects often reduce the patient's quality of life and can place a further burden on patients, with non-compliance or discontinuation of therapy a potential consequence. Study data have shown that therapy- and disease-related side effects can be reduced using the methods of integrative medicine. Reported benefits include improving patients' wellbeing and quality of life, reducing stress, and improving patients' mood, sleeping patterns and capacity to cope with disease. Examining the impact of integrative medicine on the side effects of cancer treatment would be beyond the scope of this review. This article therefore looks at short-term side effects of cancer treatment which are usually temporary and occur during or after local and systemic therapy. The focus is on mind-body medicine, acupuncture and classic naturopathic treatments developed by Sebastian Kneipp as complementary therapies. The latter includes hydrotherapy, phytotherapy, nutritional therapy, exercise therapy and a balanced lifestyle.

Survival after adding capecitabine and trastuzumab to neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy for primary breast cancer (GBG 40--GeparQuattro).

BACKGROUND: The GeparQuattro study showed that adding capecitabine or prolonging the duration of anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 24 to 36 weeks did not increase pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Trastuzumab-treated patients with HER2-positive disease showed a higher pCR rate than patients with HER2-negative disease treated with chemotherapy alone. We here present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 1495) with cT ≥ 3 tumors, or negative hormone-receptor status, or positive hormone-receptor and clinically node-positive disease received four times epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and were thereafter randomly assigned to four times docetaxel (Taxotere), or four times docetaxel/capecitabine over 24 weeks, or four times docetaxel followed by capecitabine over 36 weeks. Patients with HER2-positive tumors received 1 year of trastuzumab, starting with the first chemotherapy cycle. Follow-up was available for a median of 5.4 years. RESULTS: Outcome was not improved for patients receiving capecitabine (HR 0.92; P = 0.463 for DFS and HR 93; P = 0.618 for OS) as well as for patients receiving 36 weeks of chemotherapy (HR 0.97; P = 0.818 for DFS and HR 0.97; P = 0.825 for OS). Trastuzumab-treated patients with HER2-positive disease showed similar DFS (P = 0.305) but a significantly better adjusted OS (P = 0.040) when compared with patients with HER2-negative disease treated with chemotherapy alone. Recorded long-term cardiac toxicity was low. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results, similar to the results of pCR, do not support the use of capecitabine in the neoadjuvant setting in addition to an anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy. However, the results support previous data showing a benefit of trastuzumab as predicted by higher pCR rates.

[Imatinib--a possible therapeutic option for cervical carcinoma: results of a preclinical phase I study]. / Imatinib - eine mogliche Therapieoption beim Zervixkarzinom: Ergebnisse einer praklinischen Phase-I-Studie.

BACKGROUND: In the last few years, the therapy of cervical carcinoma has progressed substantially due to the use of simultaneous platinum- containing radiochemotherapy. However, there are no data which evaluate an individualized treatment adapted to tumor biology, in spite of the fact that patients show remarkably different responses to chemotherapy. Therefore this preclinical phase I study aims at finding therapeutic alternatives to the current cytostatic drugs to treat cervical carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a tumor chemosensitivity assay, 8 drugs were tested on freshly isolated tumor cells of 16 patients [carbo- and cisplatin, topotecan, paclitaxel as well as the 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib (Glivec) and gefitinib (Iressa (R) ) and the 2 monoclonal antibodies cetuximab (Erbitux) and trastuzumab (Herceptin (R) )]. RESULTS: Overall the test was evaluable for 16 specimens (100%). Ten of 15 tumor samples (66.6%) were sensitive to imatinib. A sensitive therapeutic response could be demonstrated in all tested FIGO stages. An interindividual comparison could establish sensitivity to cetuximab in 12.5% of cases, to gefitinib in 6.25%, to trastuzumab in 6.6%, to cisplatin in 13.3%, to carboplatin in 7.6%, to paclitaxel in 93.8% and to topotecan in 25%. CONCLUSION: Imatinib seems to be an efficacious therapeutic option for patients with cervical carcinoma, independently of tumor subtype.

Randomised trial: survival benefit and safety of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.

We evaluated the survival benefit, safety, feasibility, and tolerability of dose-dense (DD) adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel for women with node-positive primary breast cancer. Randomised patients (n=216) received DD or conventional-schedule (CS) chemotherapy. Dose-dense regimen patients (n=108) received epirubicin 90 mg m-2 plus paclitaxel 175 mg m-2 in four 14-day cycles, then cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2, methotrexate 40 mg m-2, and fluorouracil 600 mg m-2 (CMF 600/40/600) in three 14-day cycles, plus filgrastim 5 microg kg day-1 as growth support in every cycle. Conventional-schedule regimen patients (n=108) received epirubicin 90 mg m-2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2 in four 21-day cycles, then CMF 600/40/600 in three 21-day cycles, plus filgrastim if required. After a median follow-up of 38.4 months, 71 patients (33%) relapsed or died: DD, 33 patients (15 deaths); CS, 38 patients (22 deaths). Dose dense showed a trend for improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Four-year rates of DFS and OS were 64 and 85% for DD, and 58 and 75% for CS. All seven cycles were administered to 208 patients (96%). Rates of cycle delay, discontinuation, dose reduction, and adverse events were similar in both groups. Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin/paclitaxel then CMF, supported by filgrastim, is safe and improves survival for patients with node-positive breast cancer.

[Dose intensified adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk breast carcinoma with 4-9 positive lymph nodes]. / Dosisintensivierte adjuvante Chemotherapie beim Hochrisikomammakarzinom mit 4-9 positiven Lymphknoten.

OBJECTIVE: Taxanes and anthracyclines represent the two most active groups of agents for the treatment of breast cancer. We evaluated this combination in patients with more than 3 positive lymph nodes in an adjuvant, dose-intensive, sequential therapy in comparison with the standard chemotherapy regimen epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in relation to toxicities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 9/96 127 patients with 4-9/over 9 positive lymph nodes have been recruited from 21 participating centers in an ongoing trial. 67 patients were prospectively randomised for first-line chemotherapy to treatment group A (epirubicin 90 mg/m2-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2; 4 cycles bi-weekly, supported by G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg day 5-13 and 3 sequential cycles of CMF 600/40/600 mg/m2 at 2-weeks interval) and 60 patients to treatment group B (epirubicin 90 mg/m2-cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, 4 cycles tri-weekly, and 3 sequential cycles of CMF 600/40/600 mg/m2 at 3-weeks interval). RESULTS: Preliminary safety and toxicity data are evaluable for 679 cycles. Data about response rate and disease-free-survival and overall survival will be delivered later. For the hematological toxicity the main grade 3 and 4 adverse events for A vs. B were: leucopenia 9.8% vs. 8.4%, febrile neutropenia 1.6% vs. 0.8%--anemia (< 5.9 mmol/l), 0.4% vs. 0.2%--thrombopenia 0% vs. 0%. Non-hematological toxicity occurred more frequently in group A (grade 2, 3, 4):--neuropathy 4.4% vs. 0%,--nausea/emesis 27.8% vs. 19.3%,--fatigue 14.6% vs. 3.4% and mucositis 2.8% vs. 0.3%.