Prioritization of implementation barriers related to integrated care models in Central and Eastern European countries.

The importance of integrated care will increase in future health systems due to aging populations and patients with chronic multimorbidity, however, such complex healthcare interventions are often developed and implemented in higher income countries. For Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries it is important to investigate which integrated care models are transferable to their setting and facilitate the implementation of relevant models by identifying barriers to their implementation. This study investigates the relative importance of integrated care models and the most critical barriers for their implementation in CEE countries. Experts from Croatia, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Serbia were invited to complete an online survey within the SELFIE H2020 project. 81 respondents completed the survey. Although experts indicated that some integrated care models were already being implemented in CEE countries, the survey revealed a great need for further improvement in the integration of care, especially the managed care of oncology patients, coordinated palliative care of terminally ill patients, and nursing care of elderly with multimorbidity. Lack of long-term financial sustainability as well as of dedicated financing schemes were seen the most critical implementation barriers, followed by the lack of integration between health and social care providers and insufficient availability of human resources. These insights can guide future policy making on integrated care in CEE countries.

Implementation of evidence-based health policy in the field of integrated care: A Ritka Betegségek Nemzeti Eroforrás Központjának tervezési folyamata / Bizonyítékokon alapuló egészségpolitikai döntéshozatal az integrált ellátásban: A Ritka Betegségek Nemzeti Eroforrás Központjának tervezési folyamata

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A ritka betegséggel élok ellátásában fontos elorelépések történtek az elmúlt években. Egy következo lépés lehetne hazánkban a Ritka Betegségek Nemzeti Eroforrás (Uni-Versum) Központjának (a továbbiakban: Központ) létrehozása, amely az egészségügyi, szociális és köznevelési szolgáltatásokat összehangolva és kiegészítve személyközpontú ellátást nyújtana a betegek és támogatóik részére. Célkituzés: Célunk az volt, hogy egy nemzetközi tudományos módszertan alapján javaslatokat tegyünk arra, hogy milyen eszközökkel lehet feloldani a Központ megvalósításának lehetséges korlátozó tényezoit. Módszer: A Központ megvalósíthatóságának értékelésére interdiszciplináris szakmai egyeztetést szerveztünk különbözo érintett érdekcsoportok részvételével, a SELFIE H2020 kutatási projekt által kidolgozott módszertan alapján. Az elozetesen rangsorolt legfontosabb korlátozó tényezokre lehetséges megoldási javaslatokat tettünk. Eredmények: A lehetséges korlátozó tényezoket a résztvevok relevánsnak tartották a Központ létrehozásával kapcsolatban, és ezekre összesen 17 olyan konkrét javaslat született, amelyben a résztvevok között egyetértés alakult ki. A javaslatok kiterjedtek az ellátás tartalmára, az alkalmazott technológiák támogató szerepére, a humáneroforrás-korlátok megoldására, a hatékony vezetés és szervezés kialakítására, az összetett finanszírozási struktúra kialakítására és a kutatási lehetoségek megteremtésére is. Megbeszélés: A Központ megvalósítása esetén a ritka betegséggel élok ellátása az egészségügyi, szociális és köznevelési tevékenységeket integráló megközelítés felé mozdulna el. A kutatás során megfogalmazott javaslatok hozzájárulhatnak a Központ létrehozásához, amennyiben megvan az ehhez szükséges szakpolitikai támogatás is. Ezen túlmutatóan, a leírt munkamódszer más integrált ellátási modellek bevezethetoségének elemzéséhez is mintaként szolgálhat. Következtetés: Összefoglalva megállapíthatjuk, hogy a Központ létrehozásához számos, elozetesen is látható korlátozó tényezot kell feloldani. Az érdekcsoportok közös javaslatai alapján kialakítható egy olyan muködési forma, amely az ellátórendszerek kiegészítésével és összehangolásával jelentos társadalmi értéktöbbletet eredményezhet. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1818-1825. INTRODUCTION: In Hungary, significant achievements have been made in the care of patients with rare diseases in recent years. A next step could be the establishment of the National Resource Centre for Rare Diseases (hereinafter: Centre) to facilitate patient-centered complex care by the integration and supplementation of existing health, social and educational services. OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to develop recommendations based on international scientific methodology to overcome potential implementation barriers of the aforementioned Centre. METHOD: To evaluate the feasibility of the implementation, we organized an interdisciplinary workshop with representatives of different stakeholder groups, adopting the methodology developed in the SELFIE H2020 research project. During the workshop, we discussed the previously ranked, most significant implementation barriers and made recommendations for potential solutions. RESULTS: The potential implementation barriers were considered relevant by the participants and, reflecting on these barriers, altogether 17 recommendations were developed by consensus. These recommendations were related to the content of service delivery, use of supportive technologies, overcoming workforce issues, establishing effective leadership, implementing a complex financing structure and creating research opportunities. DISCUSSION: Implementation of the Centre would shift the care of rare diseases towards personalized and integrated health, social and educational services. Our recommendations will contribute to the establishment of the Centre, subject to positive policy decision. Furthermore, our methodological approach could support the feasibility assessment of future integrated care solutions and programs. CONCLUSION: Several predictable barriers must be overcome to establish the Centre. Recommendations developed by representatives of relevant stakeholders could support successful implementation and societal value generation. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1818-1825.

Proposal for capturing patient experience through extended value frameworks of health technologies.

BACKGROUND: Inclusion of patient experience (PEx) in health technology assessment (HTA) has become increasingly important; however, no harmonized approach exists to help manufacturers or decision makers ensure PEx considerations are fair, consistent, and thorough within global HTA frameworks. OBJECTIVE: To develop a proposal for including PEx in the HTA frameworks of health technologies. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) on existing value frameworks (VFs) was conducted to capture how PEx-related value judgment is currently considered. Guided by the results of the SLR, a research group including HTA experts and patient representatives used an iterative process to develop potential value domains to capture PEx, in accordance with international guidelines. Subsequently, a panel of international payer experts was used to challenge the proposed PEx domains and provide recommendations for implementation. RESULTS: The SLR found 61 VFs and multi-criteria decision analyses (MCDAs) that considered PEx; however, PEx-related value elements were often referred to superficially, without clear definitions. Five potential PEx domains, with proposed measures for each, were developed and refined using expert feedback: (1) responsiveness to patient's individual needs, (2) improved health literacy and empowerment, (3) patient and caregiver reported outcomes, (4) household's financial burden, and (5) improved access for vulnerable patient populations. A flexible approach for framework implementation was proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Proposed PEx domains could be implemented at multiple levels of healthcare decision making to formalize consideration of PEx in the assessment of value, either through the extension of existing VFs or to create new PEx-focused VFs and more holistic decision making tools. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded and sponsored by UCB Pharma. The funding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. Charokopou, Mountain, and Szegvari are employed by UCB Pharma. Inotai, Jakab, and Kalo are employed by Syreon Research Institute, which received funding from UCB Pharma for this research. Brixner has received fees from AbbVie, Elevar, Millcreek Outcomes Group, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, and Xcenda. Campbell has received grants and contracts from the PhRMA Foundation and the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. During a sabbatical leave, Campbell collaborated with Syreon Research Institute on research projects that included funding from UCB Pharma. Hawkins has received consultancy fees from UCB Pharma. Kristensen has received speakers bureau fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and consultancy fees from UCB Pharma.

Development of transferability guidance for integrated care models with special focus on Central and Eastern European countries.

AIM: To develop pragmatic recommendations for Central and Eastern European (CEE) policymakers about transferability assessment of integrated care models established in higher income European Union (EU) countries. METHODS: Draft recommendations were developed based on Horizon 2020-funded SELFIE project deliverables related to 17 promising integrated care models for multimorbid patients throughout Europe, as well as on an online survey among CEE stakeholders on the relevance of implementation barriers. Draft recommendations were discussed at the SELFIE transferability workshop and finalized together with 22 experts from 12 CEE countries. RESULTS: Thirteen transferability recommendations are provided in three areas. Feasibility of local implementation covers the identification and prioritization of implementation barriers and proposals for potential solutions. Performance measurement of potentially transferable models focuses on the selection of models with proven benefits and assurance of performance monitoring. Transferability of financing methods for integrated care explores the relevance of financing methodologies and planning of adequate initial and long-term financing. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of international integrated care models cannot be recommended without evidence on its local feasibility or scientifically sound and locally relevant performance assessment in the country of origin. However, if the original financing method is not transferable to the target region, development of a locally relevant alternative financing method can be considered.

Planning, implementation and operation of a personalized patient management system for subjects with first suspect of cancer (OnkoNetwork): system description based on a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: OnkoNetwork is a recently established integrated care model with a personalized pathway system to manage patients with first suspect of a solid tumour in secondary care, that evolved as a regional initiative in Hungary. The primary aim of OnkoNetwork is the improvement of clinical outcomes via timely access to quality assured and defragmented healthcare services. The Horizon 2020 funded SELFIE project has selected OnkoNetwork for in-depth qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The aim of this study was to provide a qualitative evaluation of OnkoNetwork along the six components of the SELFIE conceptual framework: 1) service delivery, 2) leadership and governance, 3) workforce, 4) financing, 5) technologies and medical products, and 6) information and research. METHODS: Analysis of published and grey programme documentation, followed by 20 semi-structured interviews with representatives of programme initiators, general and financial managers, involved physicians and non-physician professionals, patients and their informal caregivers. Transcripts of all interviews were analysed by Mayring's content analysis method by two independent researchers. RESULTS: This study yielded the first comprehensive description of the programme. OnkoNetwork is a blue dahila in Central and Eastern Europe, providing timely and quality-assured healthcare services for the target patients by personalized patient path monitoring and management in a financially sustainable manner without macro-level financing of its operation. Innovative professional roles were implemented for non-physicians and physicians, and a supporting information technology application was developed. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a systematic description of OnkoNetwork on the six components of the SELFIE conceptual framework for integrated care in multimorbidity to understand how and why OnkoNetwork was implemented and cares (better) for its patients. Because integrated care models are designed and adjusted to their specific local needs and context, those few successful and sustainable models that were established in Central and Eastern European countries represent important benchmarks for other initiatives in this region. Experience with OnkoNetwork during its planning, implementation and operation including the description of key success factors and barriers as perceived by various stakeholder groups, may support the development of further integrated care models especially in countries with similar economic status and healthcare settings.