Gynecologists' attitudes toward and use of complementary and integrative medicine approaches: results of a national survey in Germany.

PURPOSE: Despite patients' widespread use and acceptance of complementary and integrative medicine (IM), few data are available regarding health-care professionals' current implementation of it in clinical routine. A national survey was conducted to assess gynecologists' attitudes to and implementation of complementary and integrative treatment approaches. METHODS: The Working Group on Integrative Medicine of the German Society of Gynecological Oncology conducted an online survey in collaboration with the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) in July 2019. A 29-item survey was sent to all DGGG members by email. RESULTS: Questionnaires from 180 gynecologists were analyzed, of whom 61 were working office-based in private practice and 95 were employed in hospitals. Seventy percent stated that IM concepts are implemented in their routine clinical work. Most physicians reported using IM methods in gynecological oncology. The main indications for IM therapies were fatigue (n = 98), nausea and vomiting (n = 89), climacteric symptoms (n = 87), and sleep disturbances (n = 86). The most commonly recommended methods were exercise therapy (n = 86), mistletoe therapy (n = 78), and phytotherapy (n = 74). Gynecologists offering IM were more often female (P = 0.001), more often had qualifications in anthroposophic medicine (P = 0.005) or naturopathy (P = 0.019), and were more often based in large cities (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong interest in IM among gynecologists. The availability of evidence-based training in IM is increasing. Integrative therapy approaches are being implemented in clinical routine more and more, and integrative counseling services are present all over Germany. Efforts should focus on extending evidence-based knowledge of IM in both gynecology and gynecological oncology.

The usage of over-the-counter products by private insured patients in Germany - a claims data analysis with focus on complementary medicine.

BACKGROUND: An important contribution to well-being of human beings can be observed by the use of self-medication products that is reflected in the constantly growing volume of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. The aim of the current study was to extend the measurement concept for OTCs by exploring the relevance of the peripheral assortment provided by the widely accepted framework of the Anatomical Therapeutical and Chemical (ATC) classification of the WHO. METHODS: The focus was on the prescriptions and drug-related receipts submitted by privately insured persons to 18 private health insurers (PHIs) in Germany from the year 2016. The age- and gender-specific average claims amount per risks of outpatient drug expenditure were used as weights to scale up the relative distributions of the item amounts. The ATC-classification defines the commodity groups and discriminates between the main and the peripheral assortment. A descriptive analysis assessed the OTC frequencies and sum scores of the product groups within the main and peripheral assortment whereby the study group explored and assessed the relevance of each category independently according to the OTCs and integrative medicines. RESULTS: The analysis included 22.1 Mio. packages from the main assortment and examined 10.1 Mio. packages from the peripheral assortment. The latter was examined thoroughly and the commodity groups "Pharmaceutical food products", "Medicinal products for special therapy options" and particular "Hygiene and body care products" meet the defined requirements for OTCs relevant for integrative medicines. A high proportion of OTC products from the peripheral assortment was associated with the categories "medicinal products for special therapy options". Homeopathy and anthroposophy present two special therapy options, which are relevant for the extended OTC measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of OTC drugs is feasible when the main and the peripheral assortment is available and enable to integrate about 18% of all OTCs, which are neglected by the common ATC-based approach. The presented extended approach may help to identify potential users of OTCs or people in need of OTC use. In case of the highly disputed homeopathy and anthroposophy products, more research among interactions with prescriptions drugs (Rx), nutrition's and other potentially harmful exposures is recommended.

Potential Interactions of Biologically Based Complementary Medicine in Gynecological Oncology.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the potential risks of interactions between biologically based complementary and alternative medication (BB-CAM) and conventional drugs during systemic therapy in breast and gynecological cancer patients by analyzing the actual CAM-drug combinations from individual patients' records. METHODS: From September 2014 to December 2014 and from February 2017 to May 2017, all patients (n = 717) undergoing systemic therapy at the Gynecologic Oncology Day Care Unit in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the Technical University of Munich, Germany, were asked to participate in a questionnaire about all their medications. To assess the potential risk of CAM-drug interactions (CDIs), we initially utilized the Lexicomp drug interaction database. This assessment was then expanded with a systematic search of other digital databases, such as the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, PubMed, and MEDLINE as well as the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Among 448 respondents, 74.1% reported using BB-CAM simultaneously with their systemic therapy. The assessment showed 1 patient with a potentially clinically relevant CDI, where the interaction was based on a self-medicated combination of Echinacea and cyclophosphamide. Furthermore, 81 patients (18.1%) were thought to have interactions because of a combination of BB-CAMs and cytochrome P450 3A4-metabolized anticancer drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated high overall use of BB-CAMs by cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy. The analyses showed only 1 clinically relevant CDI.

Gynecologic oncologists' attitudes and practices relating to integrative medicine: results of a nationwide AGO survey.

PURPOSE: The growing popularity and acceptance of integrative medicine is evident both among patients and among the oncologists treating them. As little data are available regarding health-care professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices relating to the topic, a nationwide online survey was designed. METHODS: Over a period of 11 weeks (from July 15 to September 30, 2014) a self-administered, 17-item online survey was sent to all 676 members of the Research Group on Gynecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie) in the German Cancer Society. The questionnaire items addressed the use of integrative therapy methods, fields of indications for them, advice services provided, level of specific qualifications, and other topics. RESULTS: Of the 104 respondents (15.4%) using integrative medicine, 93% reported that integrative therapy was offered to breast cancer patients. The second most frequent type of tumor in connection with which integrative therapy methods were recommended was ovarian cancer, at 80% of the participants using integrative medicine. Exercise, nutritional therapy, dietary supplements, herbal medicines, and acupuncture were the methods the patients were most commonly advised to use. CONCLUSION: There is considerable interest in integrative medicine among gynecological oncologists, but integrative therapy approaches are at present poorly implemented in routine clinical work. Furthermore there is a lack of specific training. Whether future efforts should focus on extending counseling services on integrative medicine approaches in gynecologic oncology or not, have to be discussed. Evidence-based training on integrative medicine should be implemented in order to safely guide patients in their wish to do something by themselves.

Effects of Exemestane and Tamoxifen treatment on bone texture analysis assessed by TBS in comparison with bone mineral density assessed by DXA in women with breast cancer.

We performed an analysis of a substudy of the randomized Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial to determine the effects of exemestane (EXE) and tamoxifen (TAM) adjuvant treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry compared with the trabecular bone score, a novel grey-level texture measurement that correlates with 3-dimensional parameters of bone texture in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer for the first time. In total, 36 women were randomized to receive TAM (n = 17) or EXE (n = 19). Patients receiving TAM showed a mean increase of BMD in lumbar spine from baseline of 1.0%, 1.5%, and 1.9% and in trabecular bone score of 2.2%, 3.5%, and 3.3% at 6-, 12-, and 24-mo treatment, respectively. Conversely, patients receiving EXE showed a mean decrease from baseline in lumbar spine BMD of -2.3%, -3.6%, and -5.3% and in trabecular bone score of -0.9%, -1.7%, and -2.3% at 6-, 12-, and 24-mo treatment, respectively. Changes in trabecular bone score from baseline at spine were also significantly different between EXE and TAM: p = 0.05, 0.007, and 0.006 at 6, 12, and 24 mo, respectively. TAM induced an increase in BMD and bone texture analysis, whereas EXE resulted in decreases. The results were independent from each other.

Influence of compliance on bone mineral density changes in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer on Anastrozole.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitors is associated with increased bone loss depending on the compliance to treatment. METHODS: In this bone substudy, bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12- and 24-month treatment in 63 patients receiving Anastrozole as adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. To minimize the effects of confounders, a matched pair analysis (compliant N = 21, non-compliant N = 21) was performed. RESULTS: Anastrozole treatment in compliant patients leads to a decrease in BMD (g/cm(2)) at lumbar spine and total hip from baseline to 12 and 24 months (-2.57 % P = 0.004; -2.02 % P = 0.05; -2.57 % P = 0.001 and -4.18 % P = 0.003, respectively) compared to non-compliant patients (-1.71 % P = 0.050; -2.00 % P = 0.085; -1.65 % P = 0.055 and -3.20 % P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anastrozole treatment in compliant patients with breast cancer resulted in a larger, increase in bone loss at 12 and 24 months compared to non-compliant patients. Bone loss stabilized in both groups at the spine from 12- to 24-month treatment, whereas maintained at the total hip.

Use of acupuncture and other CAM methods in obstetrics: an analysis of 409,413 deliveries from Hesse, Germany.

OBJECTIVES: This study was done to analyze the frequency of use of acupuncture and other complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods during labor and to investigate the different characteristics of women being treated with or without acupuncture and CAM methods, as well as try to analyze birth-related outcome measures. STUDY DESIGN: Data were analyzed from 409,413 deliveries, registered between 2001 and 2008 by the agency for quality assurance in Hesse (the Hessian Perinatal Registry [HEPE] survey), which made up more than 95% of all deliveries in this German state during the given time period. RESULTS: Interest in the use of CAM seems to have decreased within the given time period. On average, acupuncture was used in 3.7% (15,345/409,295) of all deliveries and other CAM methods in 4.8% (19,507/409,295). The most important determinant for the use of one or both methods was the type of hospital. It was also found that German women with higher job qualifications were more likely to receive CAM treatment during delivery. Interestingly, application of CAM methods was associated with a higher use of analgesics during labor. The risk status of the pregnancy or the delivery was of minor importance. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that the determinants of CAM use are similar to those in the field of oncology. In order to assess the efficacy of acupuncture or other CAM methods in the field of obstetrics, it seems necessary to extend the HEPE survey to cover these areas.

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary of the hypercalcaemic type: an analysis of clinical and prognostic aspects of a rare disease on the basis of cases published in the literature.

PURPOSE: Ovarian small cell carcinoma of the hypercalcaemic type is a very rare and highly aggressive malignant disease, mainly affecting young women. Due to the rarity of this tumour entity, prospective randomised trials are unlikely to be conducted, and the only retrospective analysis based on a large case series is from 1994. Since diagnostic and treatment modalities may have changed, we initiated this analysis. METHODS: The aim of our study was to review and analyse cases published since 1975 to validate former findings and to gather more information about therapy options, diagnostic and prognostic factors. A systematic literature search of the PubMed/Medline database was performed assessing all articles until September 2010. All retrieved articles were evaluated and cross-checked for references on the topic. In total, 135 cases were included, selected from 62 case reports and smaller case studies. RESULTS: Small cell carcinoma mostly affects women with a mean age of 23.4 years. They present with unspecific symptoms like abdominal pain or palpable mass, sometimes accompanied by an elevated calcium or CA-125 serum concentration. The tumour appears nearly almost unilaterally, mostly affecting the right ovary. Tumour stage is a clearly prognostic factor. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of etoposide, cisplatinum/carboplatinum or vinca alkaloids has shown improved survival, whereas radiotherapy has not. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of limitations this analysis provides new insights especially with respect to therapeutic aspects. This review underlines the importance of case reports in rare tumour entities in order to answer open questions.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine during pregnancy and delivery.

PURPOSE: To assess the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) during pregnancy and birth and the reasons behind it from the patient's perspective. METHODS: In a prospective study, we assessed the use of CAM before and during pregnancy as well as during delivery in women by means of a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: Some 205 patients completed the questionnaire at a response rate of 43.2% (205/475) and 104 women used CAM during pregnancy, especially homoeopathy, acupuncture, and phytotherapy. Stepwise regression analysis identified CAM use prior to pregnancy, greater income, and nationality as the most important predictors of CAM use. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with earlier studies from Germany, we determined the most important methods used in the field of obstetrics. Interestingly, these are not evidence-based and those methods which are evidence-based are not now used. Also, the predictors of CAM use in pregnancy were similar to those in oncology. Future studies should focus on the safety and efficacy of CAM in pregnancy.

Clinical indications and perceived effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine in departments of obstetrics in Germany: a questionnaire study.

OBJECTIVE: Our earlier study on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods showed that acupuncture, homeopathy, and aromatherapy are available in most obstetrics departments in Germany but it did not evaluate the clinical indications for using CAM. The present study aimed to explore further the effectiveness of CAM use in obstetrics. STUDY DESIGN: We sent all departments of obstetrics in North Rhine-Westphalia a questionnaire designed to delineate their use of acupuncture, homeopathy, and aromatherapy during childbirth. It sought details on who provided the CAM therapy (midwife or physician). We asked respondents to indicate on a five-point scale how reasonable or otherwise they would consider the provision of CAM in each of six common problem situations and to estimate for each the proportion of patients given the CAM treatment. Respondents were also asked about the rationale for offering CAM, quality assurance and side effects. Spearman's bivariate correlation, cross-tabulation and Pearson's chi(2) test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: About 73.4% (138/187) of the departments responded. Acupuncture and homoeopathy were most widely used. Although obstetricians are responsible for patient care, decisions to provide CAM were largely taken by midwives, and the midwives' belief in the methods' effectiveness and patient demand were the principle motivating factors. Rates of CAM use in the six problem scenarios evaluated were directly related to practitioners' perceptions of the methods' therapeutic effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: CAM methods were widely offered despite the lack of evidence of effectiveness or information on adverse consequences. In Germany, including CAM in the mandatory national quality assurance measures and perinatal surveys would provide valuable information; CAM use elsewhere merits further study.