Prolonged survival in patients with hand-foot skin reaction secondary to cooperative sorafenib treatment.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is an oral drug that prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Adverse events, including hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), lead to permanent sorafenib discontinuation. AIM: To clarify the association between interventions for adverse events and patient prognosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients treated with sorafenib monotherapy between May 2009 and March 2018. We developed a mutual cooperation system that was initiated at the start of sorafenib treatment to effectively manage adverse events. The mutual cooperation system entailed patients receiving consultations during which pharmacists provided accurate information about sorafenib to alleviate the fear and anxiety related to adverse events. We stratified the patients into three groups: Group A, patients without HFSR but with pharmacist intervention; Group B, patients with HFSR and pharmacist interventions unreported to oncologists (nonmutual cooperation system); and Group C, patients with HFSR and pharmacist interventions known to oncologists (mutual cooperation system). OS and time to treatment failure (TTF) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: We enrolled 134 patients (Group A, n = 41; Group B, n = 30; Group C, n = 63). The median OS was significantly different between Groups A and C (6.2 vs 13.9 mo, p < 0.01) but not between Groups A and B (6.2 vs 7.7 mo, P = 0.62). Group A vs Group C was an independent OS predictor (HR, 0.41; 95%CI: 0.25-0.66; P < 0.01). In Group B alone, TTF was significantly lower and the nonadherence rate was higher (P < 0.01). In addition, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between OS and TTF in each group were 0.41 (Group A; P < 0.01), 0.13 (Group B; P = 0.51), and 0.58 (Group C; P < 0.01). There was a highly significant correlation between OS and TTF in Group C. However, there was no correlation between OS and TTF in Group B. CONCLUSION: The mutual cooperation system increased treatment duration and improved prognosis in patients with HFSR. Future prospective studies (e.g., randomized controlled trials) and improved adherence could help prevent OS underestimation.

Balloon-Occluded Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Technique with Alternate Infusion of Cisplatin and Gelatin Slurry for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Nodules Adjacent to the Glisson Sheath.

OBJECTIVE: It is difficult to control small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules adjacent to the Glisson sheath (GS) by trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) probably due to multiple small tumor feeders directly branching from the trunk artery. The purpose of this study was to conduct a retrospective evaluation of a new TACE technique called the repeated alternate infusion of cisplatin solution and gelatin slurry distal to balloon occlusion (RAIB-TACE), for the treatment of small HCC nodules adjacent to GS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Small nodules less than 4 cm attached to proximal portion of the subsegmental to lobar level portal branch were retrospectively selected. Between January 2011 and April 2014, 29 nodules in 29 patients were treated by super-selective lipiodol TACE/balloon-occluded TACE (B-TACE) (Lip-TACE group). Since April 2014, treatment protocols for small nodules adjacent to GS were changed, and 14 nodules in 12 patients were treated by RAIB-TACE (RAIB-TACE group). In RAIB-TACE group, alternate infusion of cisplatin solution and sparse gelatin slurry (mixture of 80 mg of gelatin fragments and 20 mL of contrast medium) were repeated until arterial flow was ceased. In Lip-TACE group, lipiodol was used as drug carrier and dense gelatin slurry (mixture of 80 mg of gelatin fragments and 2 mL of contrast medium) as embolization material. Dynamic CT/MRI was obtained 1-3 months after TACE, and response of each nodule was evaluated basing on modified RECIST criteria. RESULTS: In RAIB-TACE group, all 14 nodules (100%) were diagnosed as CR or PR. In Lip-TACE group, 18 of 29 (62.1%) were diagnosed as CR or PR. There was a statistically significant difference in objective response ratio between the groups (p=0.008, Fisher's test). Biloma (n=1) and benign stricture of the right hepatic duct (n=1) were seen in RAIB-TACE group. The biloma shrunk without treatment and the patient had no symptom, but the patient with biliary stricture repeated cholangitis and was treated by administration of antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The study results show that RAIB-TACE is more effective than lipiodol TACE/B-TACE for small hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to GS. We speculate that one of the reasons to explain why Lip-TACE is inferior to RAIB-TACE is that viscous lipiodol or dense gelatin slurry could not flow into small tumor feeders effectively.

Multikinase inhibitor-associated hand-foot skin reaction as a predictor of outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between the onsets of multikinase inhibitor (MKI)-associated hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and prognosis under intervention by pharmacists after the introduction of sorafenib. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study involving 40 patients treated with sorafenib. Intervention by pharmacists began at the time of treatment introduction and continued until the appearance of symptomatic exacerbation or non-permissible adverse reactions. We examined the relationship between MKI-associated HFSR and overall survival (OS) after the initiation of treatment. RESULTS: The median OS was 10.9 mo in the MKI-associated HFSR group and 3.4 mo in the no HFSR group, showing a significant difference in multivariate analysis. A multivariate analysis of the time to treatment failure indicated that the intervention by pharmacists and MKI-associated HFSR were significant factors. The median cumulative dose and the mean medication possession ratio were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the non-intervention group. A borderline significant difference was observed in terms of OS in this group. CONCLUSION: Intervention by pharmacists increased drug adherence. Under increased adherence, MKI-associated HFSR was an advantageous surrogate marker. Intervention by healthcare providers needs to be performed for adequate sorafenib treatment.

[Appropriate dosing of fosaprepitant for colon cancer patients].

After fosaprepitant (FOS)was added to the National Health Insurance drug reimbursement price list, we switched the route of administration of antiemetics from oral to intravenous in chemotherapy regimens for colon cancer to improve patient medication adherence. However, because the number of patients reporting application-site disorders after administration of FOS increased, we monitored the incidence of these disorders in patients with colon cancer to identify ways to avoid them. In our prospective study, patients receiving conventional FOS dosing regimens (control group)were compared with those receiving diluted FOS solutions (study group). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the incidence of application-site disorders, and contrary to expectations, the incidence was higher in the study group than in the control group. On the basis of the principle of non-maleficence and the availability of alternative therapies using oral aprepitant (APR), we terminated this study early and adopted the basic strategy that all patients with application-site disorders, except for those with central venous access devices, should be treated with oral APR after confirming their preferences.