Doublet or Triplet Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: an Open-Label, Randomized, and Multicenter Exploratory Phase 2 Study.

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan is classified as an anticancer agent that poses a moderate emetic risk in the international guidelines for antiemetic therapy. The guidelines recommend emesis prophylaxis using a two-drug combination therapy comprising a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA) and dexamethasone (DEX). However, the high incidence of nausea and vomiting associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan is problematic. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline version 1.2023 classified trastuzumab deruxtecan as having a high risk of emesis and changed its recommendation to a triplet regimen including a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA). However, the emetogenic potential of trastuzumab-deruxtecan and the optimal antiemetic prophylaxis are controversial. Hence, this exploratory phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment comprising 5-HT3RA and DEX with or without a NK1RA in preventing trastuzumab deruxtecan-induced nausea and vomiting. Methods: We conducted an open-label and randomized exploratory phase 2 study at 14 centers in Japan. Patients with breast cancer who were scheduled to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive granisetron and DEX (arm GD) or granisetron, DEX, and aprepitant (fosaprepitant; arm GDA). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis or no rescue therapy) during the overall phase (120 h after the start of trastuzumab deruxtecan). Results: Between September 2020 and March 2023, 40 patients were randomly assigned to the GD (n = 19) or GDA (n = 21) arm. In the GDA arm, one patient who did not complete the use of the rescue medication listed in the diary was excluded from the efficacy analysis, which included the use of rescue medication. The CR rates during the overall phase were 36.8% and 70.0% in the GD and GDA arms, respectively (odds ratio 0.1334; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0232-0.7672; P = 0.0190), with a difference of 33.2%. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity related to antiemetic therapy was observed. Conclusions: Patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan require triple therapy, including mandatory NK1RA administration.

Postoperative hormonal therapy prevents recovery of neurological damage after surgery in patients with breast cancer.

Cancer survivors are exposed to several risk factors for cognitive dysfunction, such as general anesthesia, surgical trauma, and adjuvant therapies. In our recent study we showed that thalamic volume reduction and attentional dysfunction occurred shortly after surgery. Here, we examined the 6-month prognosis of the 20 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery. Seven patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy after the surgery and 13 patients received a hormonal therapy after the surgery. We assessed their attentional functions, and thalamic volumes shortly after and 6 months after surgery. We found a significant group x time interaction in the attentional functions (p = 0.033) and the right thalamus (p < 0.05, small volume correction), suggesting the thalamic volume reduction and attentional dysfunction recovered in patients without adjuvant therapy. Our findings provide a better understanding of the potential role of hormonal therapy in relation to the cognitive dysfunction of cancer survivors.

Postoperative Structural Brain Changes and Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of the early response to surgery on brain structure and cognitive function in patients with breast cancer. It was hypothesized that the structure of the thalamus would change during the early response after surgery due to the effects of anesthesia and would represent one aspect of an intermediate phenotype of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). METHODS: We examined 32 postmenopausal females with breast cancer and 20 age-matched controls. We assessed their cognitive function (attention, memory, and executive function), and performed brain structural MRI 1.5 ± 0.5 days before and 5.6 ± 1.2 days after surgery. RESULTS: We found a significant interaction between regional grey matter volume (rGMV) in the thalamus (P < 0.05, familywise error (FWE), small volume correction (SVC)) and one attention domain subtest (P = 0.001, Bonferroni correction) after surgery in the patient group compared with the control group. Furthermore, the changes in attention were significantly associated with sevoflurane anesthetic dose (r2 = 0.247, ß = ‒0.471, P = 0.032) and marginally associated with rGMV changes in the thalamus (P = 0.07, FWE, SVC) in the Pt group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that alterations in brain structure, particularly in the thalamus, may occur shortly after surgery and may be associated with attentional dysfunction. This early postoperative response to anesthesia may represent an intermediate phenotype of POCD. It was assumed that patients experiencing other risk factors of POCD, such as the severity of surgery, the occurrence of complications, and pre-existing cognitive impairments, would develop clinical POCD with broad and multiple types of cognitive dysfunction.

Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.

BACKGROUND: There is concern about detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in screening mammography. DCIS accounts for a substantial proportion of screen-detected lesions but its effect on breast cancer mortality is debated. The International Cancer Screening Network conducted a comparative analysis to determine variation in DCIS detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected during 2004-2008 on number of screening examinations, detected breast cancers, DCIS cases and Globocan 2008 breast cancer incidence rates derived from national or regional cancer registers. We calculated screen-detection rates for breast cancers and DCIS. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 15 screening settings in 12 countries; 7,176,050 screening examinations; 29,605 breast cancers and 5324 DCIS cases. The ratio between highest and lowest breast cancer incidence was 2.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.76-3.00); 2.97 (95% CI 2.51-3.51) for detection of breast cancer; and 3.49 (95% CI 2.70-4.51) for detection of DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable international variation was found in DCIS detection. This variation could not be fully explained by variation in incidence nor in breast cancer detection rates. It suggests the potential for wide discrepancies in management of DCIS resulting in overtreatment of indolent DCIS or undertreatment of potentially curable disease. Comprehensive cancer registration is needed to monitor DCIS detection. Efforts to understand discrepancies and standardise management may improve care.