Clinical outcomes according to lesion complexity in patients with high bleeding risk treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy following pci: analysis from the onyx one clear study

BACKGROUND Safety and effectiveness outcomes were examined at 1 year among high bleeding risk (HBR) patients treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following PCI with zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) (Resolute Onyx, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Califor nia) according to lesion complexity (Table). METHODS The 1-year clinical outcomes were evaluated in HBR pa tients treated with ZES who were event-free following 1-month DAPT post-procedure with planned single antiplatelet therapy thereafter. Propensity score adjustment was performed to account for baseline differences (Table). RESULTS A total of 1,506 patients were stratified by complex (n » 395) or noncomplex (n » 1,111) PCI criteria (Table). Complex patients were more frequently men (72.2% vs. 66.1%; p » 0.03) and had higher rates of prior myocardial infarction (MI) (34.4% vs. 23.4%), prior CABG (24.1% vs. 8.9%), multivessel disease (78.2% vs. 39.8%), and B2/C lesion classification (84.2% vs. 75.6%), all p < 0.001. Complex patients had more lesions treated (1.7 vs. 1.2), longer stent length per patient (65.1 mm vs. 26.9 mm), and longer procedure time (58.8 min vs. 35.3 min), all p < 0.001. Procedural success was higher among noncomplex patients (90.8% vs. 82.0%; p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, the rate of MI was higher in patients with complex lesions (p » 0.04). How ever, no significant differences in any outcomes between patients with and without complex lesions were present after propensity score adjustment (Table). CONCLUSION Despite greater anatomic and procedural complexity, similar safety and effectiveness were observed in complex and noncomplex patients treated with 1-month DAPT following PCI with Resolute Onyx ZES after propensity score adjustment. These findings support 1-month DAPT among selected HBR patients undergoing PCI with Resolute Onyx ZES irrespective of lesion and procedural complexity.

Vitamin D levels and platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D represents an emerging cardiovascular risk factor, and especially among higher-risk subsets of patients, such as in those with diabetes mellitus. The anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic properties of vitamin D, in fact, could be even more beneficial among diabetics, where platelet hyperreactivity and suboptimal response to antiplatelet drugs has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, no study has so far evaluated the impact of vitamin D levels on platelet reactivity and high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) among diabetic patients receiving dial antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: Our population is represented by a consecutive cohort ofdiabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor or dose-adjusted prasugrel) for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI, undergoing platelet reactivity assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients). RESULTS: We included 440 patients, that were divided according to quartiles values of vitamin D (< 9.4; 9.4-15.59; 15.6-21.64; ≥ 21.65 ng/ml). Among them, 31 were excluded as chronically treated with vitamin D supplementation. Lower vitamin D quartiles were associated with more advanced age (p = 0.01), female gender (p = 0.04), renal failure (p = 0.005), history of previous MI (p = 0.01), CABG and use of diuretics (p = 0.003), severe coronary disease (p = 0.002), but lower ejection fraction (p = 0.001), treatment with statins (p = 0.04) and new ADP-antagonists (p = 0.002). Vitamin D levels related with higher HbA1c (p = 0.001), cholesterol (p = 0.02) and creatinine (p = 0.004) and lower hemoglobin (p = 0.004). The prevalence of HRPR with ASA was low and not related to vitamin D quartiles (3.4% vs 2.7% vs 1.8% vs 2.1%, p = 0.44; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.16[0.60-2.26], p = 0.67). The prevalence of HRPR for ADP antagonists was associated to hypovitaminosis D (40.2% vs 29.1% vs 29.4% vs 25.5%, p = 0.03; (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.76[1.04-2.98], p = 0.036for I vs II-IV quartile). The impact of vitamin D quartiles, was significant only in patients on new ADP antagonists (n = 225, of whom 81 on prasugrel 5 mg; p = 0.03; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 3.12[1.34-7.49], p = 0.009) but not with clopidogrel (p = 0.85, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.05[0.49-2.24], p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, severe vitamin D deficiency is associated with a higher ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and rate of HRPR, and especially for new ADP-antagonists over clopidogrel.