The temporal association between hospital admissions, biological therapy usage and direct health care costs in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) has subsidised biological therapy since 2003. We investigated the association between biological therapy for RA hospitalisation rates and health-care costs.Hospital admissions for RA patients between 1995 and 2014 were identified in the Western Australia (WA) Hospital Morbidity Data Collection (ICD codes 714 and M05.00-M06.99). State-specific dispensing data for conventional and biological therapies for RA was obtained from Statistics Australia and expressed as defined daily doses/1000 population/day (DDD) using WA population census. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to determine the relationship between DMARDs use and hospital admission rates.A total of 17,125 patients had 50,353 admissions with a diagnostic code for RA. Between 1995 and 2002, the number of RA admissions fell from 7.9 to 2.6/1000 admissions, while conventional therapy use rose from 1.45 to 1.84 DDD. Between 2003 and 2014, RA admissions decreased further to 1.9/1000 hospital admissions, while conventional therapy use increased to 2.19 DDD and biological therapy from 0.01 to 1.0 DDD. In PCA, conventional and biological therapies use had an inverse relationship with hospital admission rates. Annual costs of biological therapy utilisation was 22.5 million in 2003-2014, while the annual cost saving of RA hospital admissions was 9.2 million.The increased use of conventional therapy use for RA has coincided with a significant decline in hospital admissions for RA patients in WA, while a more modest further decline followed biological therapy introduction. Biological therapy was not as cost-effective as conventional in relation to RA hospital admissions costs.

Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments.

OBJECTIVES: Patients can fulfil clinical criteria for remission, yet still have evidence of synovitis detectable clinically and by ultrasound, and this is associated with structural damage. Stricter remission criteria may more accurately reflect true remission (no synovitis). This hypothesis was examined by studying patients using more stringent thresholds for clinical remission and determining their levels of ultrasound synovitis. METHODS: Rheumatoid arthritis patients with a disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) ≤2.6 for at least 6 months were classified using standard and more stringent DAS28 and simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission thresholds and the corresponding clinical and ultrasound imaging measures of synovitis recorded. RESULTS: 128 patients (all DAS28 <2.6, median DAS28 1.70) receiving either disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs alone (n=66) or with a tumour necrosis factor blocker (n=62) were recruited. Of the 640 imaged joints, 5% had moderate or severe power Doppler (PD) activity, 8% were clinically swollen and 1% tender. In patients fulfilling DAS28, American College of Rheumatology or SDAI remission criteria, moderate or severe PD activity was present in 21%, 15% and 19%, respectively. More stringent DAS28 and SDAI criteria reduced the mean number of swollen and tender joints (p<0.001) but not the percentage of patients with PD activity: 32 patients had a DAS28 <1.17 but eight (25%) had significant PD activity. CONCLUSION: Using more stringent remission criteria resulted in reduced signs and symptoms of inflammation, but the percentage of joints with PD activity was not reduced, even in those without signs or symptoms. These data suggest that clinical criteria are sufficiently insensitive to detect low but clinically relevant levels of inflammation accurately.

Response-driven combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs can achieve high response rates in early rheumatoid arthritis with minimal glucocorticoid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapy in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with dose adjustments determined by response, in a clinic setting over 3 years. METHODS: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive patients with RA of median duration of 12 weeks (n = 61) attending an early arthritis clinic were treated with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and fish oil. Dosage adjustments and additions of further DMARDs were contingent on response to therapy and tolerance. Outcome measures for efficacy were Disease Activity Score (DAS28), clinical remission, and modified Sharp radiographic score and for safety, adverse events, and DMARD withdrawal. RESULTS: At baseline, subjects had at least moderately active disease (mean +/- SD DAS28 was 5.3 +/- 1.1), impaired function as measured by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) (0.9 +/- 0.5), and 37% had bone erosions. By 3 months, 29% were in remission; this increased to 54% at 3 years. The greatest fall in DAS28 and improvement in mHAQ scores occurred in the first 12 months. Erosions were detected in 62% at 3 years. The mean dose of parenteral glucocorticoid was equivalent to 0.1 mg/d of prednisolone. After 3 years, 48% remained on triple therapy; fish oil was consumed by 75% of patients, and 21% used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gastrointestinal intolerance was the most frequent unwanted event (leading to DMARD withdrawal in 17 patients). Sulfasalazine was most frequently withdrawn (30%). CONCLUSION: This implementation study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of combination therapy with inexpensive DMARDs, fish oil, and minimal glucocorticoid use, in routine clinical practice using predefined rules for dosage adjustment.