Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on pain and physical function in patients with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Non-specific low back pain is a common and clinically significant condition with substantial socioeconomic implications. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has shown benefits in pain reduction and improvement of physical function in patients with pain-associated disorders like osteoarthritis. However, studies had heterogeneous settings. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of PEMF on pain and function on patients with non-specific low back pain. METHODS: A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PEDro was performed (from inception until 15/5/2023). Outcome measures assessed pain and function. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 420 participants (n = 420) were included. The studies compared PEMF vs. placebo-PEMF, PEMF and conventional physical therapy vs. conventional physical therapy alone, PEMF and conventional physical therapy vs. placebo-PEMF and conventional physical therapy, PEMF vs. high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) vs. conventional physical therapy, and osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and PEMF vs. PEMF alone vs. placebo-PEMF vs. OMT alone. Five of the nine included studies showed statistically significant pain reduction and improvement in physical function in comparison to their control groups (p < 0.05). There was substantial heterogeneity among the groups of the study, with a wide range of duration (10-30 min), treatments per week (2-7/week), applied frequencies (3-50 Hz), and intensities (2mT-150mT). No serious adverse event had been reported in any study. The included studies showed solid methodological quality, with an overall score of 7.2 points according to the PEDro scale. CONCLUSION: PEMF therapy seems to be a safe and beneficial treatment option for non-specific low back pain, particularly if used as an addition to conventional physical therapy modalities. Future research should focus on standardized settings including assessment methods, treatment regimens, frequencies, and intensities.

The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation-a systematic short review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to focus on the effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed original articles including biofeedback and/or neurofeedback training as an intervention for smoking cessation were included. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were screened for trials published up to July 2021. The effects on smoking rates and smoking behavior, and biofeedback/neurofeedback training measures are summarized here. RESULTS: In total, three articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The total Downs and Black checklist scores ranged from 11 to 23 points, showing that the articles were of poor to good methodological quality. The included studies were heterogeneous, both in terms of treatment protocols and in terms of outcome parameters. Pooling of data for a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore, we were limited to describing the included studies. The included biofeedback study demonstrated that skin temperature training might improve the patients' ability to raise their skin temperature aiming at stress alleviation. All three studies reported positive effects of biofeedback/neurofeedback in supporting smokers to quit. Furthermore, individualized electroencephalography neurofeedback training showed promising results in one study in modulating craving-related responses. CONCLUSION: The results of the present review suggest that biofeedback/neurofeedback training might facilitate smoking cessation by changing behavioral outcomes. Although the investigated studies contained heterogeneous methodologies, they showed interesting approaches that could be further investigated and elaborated. To improve the scientific evidence, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate biofeedback/neurofeedback in clinical settings for smoking cessation.

Impact of supportive therapy modalities on heart rate variability in cancer patients - a systematic review.

Purpose: To systematically review literature for interventional studies and their impact on autonomic dysfunction assessed by heart rate variability in cancer patients.Methods: Research was conducted using the databases Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of science from their inception to October 2017. Original articles with an interventional design that reported changes in at least one heart rate variability parameter as outcome parameter were included and described.Results: Ten studies were identified as eligible for subsequent analysis. The main application field in oncological therapy setting was music therapy intervention, Traditional Chinese Medicine related treatments, exercise interventions, relaxation, and myofascial release techniques. Breast cancer was the most frequently described single cancer entity. Heart rate variability recording was performed with standard electrocardiography devices or wearable heart rate monitors, within a time range between 5 and 20 min and a sampling rate varying from 200 to 1000 Hz. No adverse events were reported in all studies.Conclusions: Supportive therapy modalities may have the potential to enhance vegetative functioning. In this context, heart rate variability analysis appears to be an easily applicable and safe method to evaluate cancer related autonomic dysfunction. More large prospective multicentre randomised controlled trials are needed.Implication for rehabilitationMost cancer patients face autonomic dysfunction due to the disease itself the applied treatments or combination of both.HRV measurement is an easy and safe method to asses autonomic dysfunction.Supportive treatments targeting on an elevation of the vagal tone and autonomic balance in general might have beneficial effects for cancer patients.

Cancer rehabilitation: current trends and practices within an Austrian University Hospital Center.

Background: Cancer rehabilitation has the goal to improve functional status, quality of life, participation, and can improve quality of patient-centered programs and health care efficiencies. In Austria, inpatient cancer rehabilitation is well established but outpatient rehabilitation has not yet established well.Methods: The present article is describing current rehabilitation in practice and focuses on cancer rehabilitation in Austria, namely bringing together a descriptive account of current trends and practices within an Austrian University Hospital Center (General Hospital of Vienna linked to the Medical University of Vienna) and the Comprehensive Cancer Centre (CCC) Vienna, Austria.Results: Cancer Rehabilitation in the described Austrian University Hospital Center is well developed due to the help of all different clinics dealing with cancer patients and of the opinion leaders of the CCC Vienna. The Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Occupational Medicine of the Medical University of Vienna as a part of the CCC Vienna with his "Pioneer-Status" and the described milestones has been integrated in the national cancer rehabilitation concept of our country from the beginning.Conclusions: Also in Austria, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with competencies in diagnostic and therapy as well as of coordination of the multiprofessional and interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams is an important part of cancer rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationCancer rehabilitation is an important part in the treatment and care of cancer patients with the goal to improve functional status, quality of life, and participationCancer rehabilitation helps cancer survivors to be integrated in their normal live, namely to increase social participation and/or workabilityThe field of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation with competencies in diagnostic and therapy as well as of coordination of the multi-professional and interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams is an important part of cancer rehabilitationInterventions and treatment approaches from the field of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation include the application of Physical Modalities like electrotherapy, thermotherapy, balneology and climatic therapy, phototherapy, and mechanotherapy Cancer rehabilitation has to be early integrated into the cancer care continuum.

Typical aspects in the rehabilitation of cancer patients suffering from metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to present a practical concept focusing on typical aspects of regular physical activity, exercise and physical modalities for patients suffering from metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma. METHODS: A narrative review of the relevant scientific literature and presentation of clinical experiences. RESULTS: In cancer patients with metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma, pain is treated in an interdisciplinary and multimodal setting by using medication, radiotherapy and physical medical modalities (e.g. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation); however, modalities increasing local blood flow, such as ultrasound therapy, thermotherapy, massage, various electrotherapy options, are not performed at the site of the tumor. For physical activity and exercise, a suitable indication of the static and dynamic capacity of the affected skeletal structures is essential. This process includes strategies to maintain and improve mobility and independence. Individually tailored and adapted physical activity and exercise concepts (programs) within a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary setting (tumor board) are used to manage the condition and bone load-bearing capacity of the patient. Typical clinical features and complications, such as pathological fractures in patients suffering from metastatic bone disease and additionally hypercalcemia, monoclonal gammopathy with bone marrow aplasia and risk of renal failure in patients with multiple myeloma have to be considered when planning supportive strategies and rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: In order to ensure the safety and effectiveness of regular physical activity, exercise, and physical modalities in patients with metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma, typical contraindications and considerations should be noted.

Effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment versus osteopathy in the cranial field in temporomandibular disorders - a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Temporomandibular disorders are a common musculoskeletal condition causing severe pain, physical and psychological disability. The effect and evidence of osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field is scarce and their use are controversial. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field in temporomandibular disorders. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial in patients with temporomandibular disorders was performed. Forty female subjects with long-term temporomandibular disorders (>3 months) were included. At enrollment, subjects were randomly assigned into two groups: (1) osteopathic manipulative treatment group (20 female patients) and (2) osteopathy in the cranial field group (20 female patients). Examination was performed at baseline (E0) and at the end of the last treatment (E1), consisting of subjective pain intensity with the Visual Analog Scale, Helkimo Index and SF-36 Health Survey. Subjects had five treatments, once a week. 36 subjects completed the study (33.7 ± 10.3 y). RESULTS: Patients in both groups showed significant reduction in Visual Analog Scale score (osteopathic manipulative treatment group: p = 0.001; osteopathy in the cranial field group: p< 0.001), Helkimo Index (osteopathic manipulative treatment group: p = 0.02; osteopathy in the cranial field group: p = 0.003) and a significant improvement in the SF-36 Health Survey - subscale "Bodily Pain" (osteopathic manipulative treatment group: p = 0.04; osteopathy in the cranial field group: p = 0.007) after five treatments (E1). All subjects (n = 36) also showed significant improvements in the above named parameters after five treatments (E1): Visual Analog Scale score (p< 0.001), Helkimo Index (p< 0.001), SF-36 Health Survey - subscale "Bodily Pain" (p = 0.001). The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant for any of the three target parameters. CONCLUSION: Both therapeutic modalities had similar clinical results. The findings of this pilot trial support the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field as an effective treatment modality in patients with temporomandibular disorders. The positive results in both treatment groups should encourage further research on osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field and support the importance of an interdisciplinary collaboration in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Implications for rehabilitation Temporomandibular disorders are the second most prevalent musculoskeletal condition with a negative impact on physical and psychological factors. There are a variety of options to treat temporomandibular disorders. This pilot study demonstrates the reduction of pain, the improvement of temporomandibular joint dysfunction and the positive impact on quality of life after osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field. Our findings support the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field and should encourage further research on osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Rehabilitation experts should consider osteopathic manipulative treatment and osteopathy in the cranial field as a beneficial treatment option for temporomandibular disorders.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the thighs in cardiac patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to update scientific knowledge concerning the safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to increase exercise capacity and prevent cardiac cachexia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: A systematic review including the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS was conducted for the time period from 1966 to March 31, 2016. RESULTS: Only four articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria (three original articles/safety studies and one case report). The three (safety) studies used NMES to increase muscle strength and/or endurance capacity of the thighs. NMES did not show electromagnetic interference (EMI) with ICD function. EMI was described in a case report of 2 patients with subpectoral ICDs and application of NMES on abdominal muscles. CONCLUSION: This review indicates that NMES may be applied in cardiac ICD patients if 1) individual risks (e. g., pacing dependency, acute heart failure, unstable angina, ventricular arrhythmic episode in the last 3 months) are excluded by performing a safety check before starting NMES treatment and 2) "passive" exercise using NMES is performed only for thighs and gluteal muscles in 3) compliant ICD patients (especially for home-based NMES) and 4) the treatment is regularly supervised by a physician and the device is examined after the first use of NMES to exclude EMI. Nevertheless, further studies including larger sample sizes are necessary to exclude any risk when NMES is used in this patient group.

Use of mental techniques for competition and recovery in professional athletes.

BACKGROUND: The present study aims to describe knowledge about and usage of mental techniques to prepare before competitions and after sport-associated injuries (SAIs) by professional athletes (team sports) in Austria. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 191 professional athletes (basketball, football, hockey, ice hockey, and volleyball teams, m:f = 142:49, 24 ± 5, 18-39 years) filled in a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic data, duration/frequency of sport practice, rate and severity of SAIs. Furthermore, the use of mental techniques and of spiritual practices before competitions and for recovery after SAI was assessed. The use of mental techniques before competitions and after SAI was correlated with socio-demographic data, duration and frequency of sport practice, and injury patterns of SAIs of the last 24 months. RESULTS: Approximately, 96 % reported knowledge about at least one mental technique. Only 13 participants used them for regeneration after SAI. Approximately, 31 % of males and 13 % of females reported the use before competitions (p = 0.017). 54 % of participants using spiritual practices used mental techniques before competitions, whereas only 13 % of participants not using spiritual practices used them (p < 0.001). 67 % of participants not using mental techniques before competitions and 88 % using them believed in the effectiveness of mental techniques in the regeneration after a SAI (p = 0.03). A significant increase of the probability of using mental techniques before competition with increasing age was found [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.101, confidence interval (CI) = (1.03, 1.18), p = 0.006]. CONCLUSION: Mental techniques seem to be well-accepted but rarely used among professional athletes. Further studies are needed to give new information about this relevant topic in professional sports.

Feasibility and acceptance of biofeedback-assisted mental training in an Austrian elementary school: a pilot study.

This pilot study aimed to investigate feasibility, acceptance, and effects of biofeedback-assisted mental training in a population of fifteen 10-year-old pupils in an Austrian elementary school. Participants were instructed in relaxation techniques by using biofeedback. Before intervention, after 6 weeks with active mental training and with regular instructions by the teacher, and after a further time period of 6 weeks without instructions, attention and concentration improved. The results indicate feasibility, good acceptance, and beneficial effects of biofeedback-assisted mental techniques in Austrian elementary school pupils.

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the knee extensor muscles on muscle soreness and different serum parameters in young male athletes: preliminary data.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on muscle soreness and on a variety of serum parameters during and after NMES of knee extensor muscles of young, well trained subjects over a study period of 96 h. METHODS: Five male cyclists were included in this clinical observation. NMES (biphasic, asymmetric impulses) was applied through surface electrodes to both knee extensor muscles of each subject for 30 min. To determine changes in serum concentration of muscle proteins, blood samples were drawn at defined measure points before and after NMES. Muscle soreness was evaluated using a visual analogue scale at all measure points. RESULTS: There was a maximum (p<0.05) for "muscle pain" during stimulation but no significant changes could be detected after the stimulation period. Serum creatine kinase showed a peak with a significant increase (p<0.05) 24 h after NMES. Serum lactate levels only increased slightly (p = 0.08) during NMES. CONCLUSIONS: Although the changes of blood parameters measured in the present work correspond to those reported in the literature on eccentric strength training, no delayed onset muscle pain could be detected. Further studies should be carried out, also investigating different stimulation protocols in non-trained healthy subjects and in patients with less muscle mass.

Long-term transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with bipolar sensing implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a pilot safety study.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an option for increasing thigh muscle strength and endurance capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) by the signals with sensing of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is possible. The aim of the present pilot safety study was to test the safety of a long-term NMES in patients with ICDs. Six patients with subpectoral ICDs were subjected to long-term NMES of thigh muscles. Four inpatients received NMES to increase muscle strength, and two outpatients performed NMES as a home treatment to increase endurance capacity. During long-term NMES, all patients together received 14 139 799 biphasic electrical pulses and 412 425 on-phases without adverse events. ICD function after the stimulation period revealed no abnormalities in any patient. These results indicate that long-term NMES of thigh muscles seems to be safe in patients with ICDs, providing that an individual risk is excluded before.

Safety of a combined strength and endurance training using neuromuscular electrical stimulation of thigh muscles in patients with heart failure and bipolar sensing cardiac pacemakers.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an effective and non-strenuous therapy to enhance the strength and endurance capacity of the skeletal muscles in patients with severe chronic heart failure. NMES in patients with pacemakers is controversial because potential electromagnetic interference may result in pacemaker malfunction. Therefore, such patients are in general excluded from NMES. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the safety of a combined NMES protocol to increase strength and endurance capacity of the skeletal muscles in patients with heart failure and implanted pacemakers. Seven patients with chronic heart failure and implanted cardiac pacemakers with bipolar sensing leads received NMES treatment of thigh muscles, using a combined protocol comprising biphasic, symmetric, rectangular constant current impulses at different frequencies (8-50 Hz), pulse width up to 60 s (8 Hz), 4 s (15 Hz), 4 s (30 Hz), and 6 s (50 Hz), and amplitudes up to +/- 100 mA (all frequencies) applied to both knee extensor and flexor muscles via surface electrodes (8 x 13 cm each). Acute electromagnetic interference during a safety procedure (telemetric monitoring) before therapeutic NMES application was not observed in any of the patients. The 7 patients received during 20 therapeutic NMES sessions a total of 23,380 on-phases, comprising 2194.08 x 10(3) biphasic electrical pulses, without adverse events. Heart rate monitoring during stimulation and pacemaker interrogation revealed no abnormalities. NMES treatment of thigh muscles using a combined NMES protocol to enhance strength and endurance capacity appears to be safe in patients with heart failure and implanted pacemakers with bipolar sensing, as far as the described electrode configuration and parameter range is applied.

[Aerobic endurance training for cancer patients]. / Aerobes Ausdauertraining für Krebspatienten.

With the increase in the number of patients who survive cancer, there is a growing need to attend to the physical and emotional effects of cancer and oncological treatment. Reduced physical performance, fatigue, nausea, weight gain, psychological distress, changes in body image, dependency, and reduced quality of life are some of the short- and long-term sequelae of cancer. We describe data from the literature about firstly the effects of aerobic exercise as an additive treatment for cancer patients, and about the feasibility of aerobic exercise secondly during oncological treatment, and thirdly in patients suffering from terminal cancer. The data from the literature support that exercise as an additive treatment may help to attenuate the physical limitations caused by cancer and oncological treatment and there by contribute to rehabilitation and quality of life of cancer patients. Feasibility of aerobic exercise has been demonstrated also for patients suffering from advanced cancer. Aerobic exercise has been shown to provide benefits to cancer patients. It enables these patients to recover their physical function and to return to an active lifestyle. Aerobic exercise seems to be an effective possibility to reduce sequelae of cancer and to increase quality of life.

Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy caused by PGE1 in a patient with congestive heart failure during cardiac rehabilitation.

Continuous chronic drug infusion with PGE1 via a portable pump and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) help to improve the quality of life in patients with severe chronic heart failure waiting for a donor heart, as both treatments can be performed at home. We report a 56-year-old woman suffering from severe chronic heart failure, who was referred for a cardiac rehabilitation program because of progressive muscle weakness and weight loss. Due to her underlying heart disease she was unable to perform voluntary exercise. NMES of both knee extensor muscles was started. Under simultaneous chronic drug infusion with PGE1 via a portable pump the patient developed clinical signs of hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, which prevented her from continuing the rehabilitation program. X-ray examinations and bone scans concurred with the diagnosis of secondary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. After the PGE1 dose had been reduced, the clinical signs of the osteoarthropathy resolved and the patient was able to continue the rehabilitation program with no difficulty. This case report underlines the importance of being aware of the potential side effects of modern cardiac drugs in the complex treatment of patients waiting for a donor heart.

[Optimizing electrotherapy--a comparative study of 3 different currents]. / Optimierung der Schwellstrombehandlung--eine Vergleichsstudie von drei unterschiedlichen Stromformen.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation can be used to increase strength of skeletal muscle. In neuromuscular electrical stimulation of innervated skeletal muscle, the application of the highest possible intensities of electricity is an important determinant of therapeutic success with regard to strength training. The therapeutic goal of "strengthening muscles" is opposed to the side effect of discomfort through the application of electricity. The aim of the present study was to compare three forms of electric current with respect to subjective tolerance and maximum achievable muscular strength. Twenty-nine healthy male volunteers were included in a single-blind study in which three forms of electric current were applied in a randomized fashion. The following types were compared: a short monophasic form, a biphasic form that was twice as long in terms of impulse duration, and a long monophasic form with an equal impulse duration than tht of the biphasic form and with an impulse form that corresponded to the short monophasic current. Stimulation was administered via surface electrodes placed on the knee extensors in the lower extremity on the right side. The intensity of the current was increased to the individual limit of tolerance or to a maximum of 100 mA. The main target parameter used to determine the success of treatment was the maximum electrically induced strength as a percentage of maximal voluntary contraction. The short monophasic form of electricity was associated with much less discomfort than the long monophasic and biphasic forms (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0062). Furthermore, the biphasic form was better tolerated (and therefore had a larger therapeutic range of application) than the long monophasic form (p = 0.041). The biphasic and long monophasic forms produced higher values for maximum electrically induced strength than did the short monophasic form (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0010). To summarize: the biphasic form had a larger range of therapeutic application than the long monophasic form. Furthermore, the biphasic form produced 40% more electrically induced strength than the short monophasic one. It may be concluded that, in terms of therapeutic application, the biphasic form of electric current is superior to the monophasic forms described in the present study.