Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vet Intern Med ; 37(5): 1830-1838, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37555741

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many dog owners alter their dog's nutritional regimen after a diagnosis of cancer. There are limited data as to specific changes made and reasons behind these changes. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To collect updated and detailed data on changes made by owners to their dog's diet and supplements after a cancer diagnosis. ANIMALS: Responses were collected from a survey of dog owners who brought their dogs to the UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital's Oncology Service for the first time after a cancer diagnosis. Dogs with recurrence or presenting for a second type of cancer were excluded. METHODS: Eligible owners were surveyed between December 2020 and March 2022. The survey contained 62 questions regarding diet, supplement use, and treats, and how these were altered after a cancer diagnosis. Responses were matched to medical record data. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight surveys were retained for analysis, including 120 respondents that completed the survey. In response to a cancer diagnosis, 54.8% (95% CI; 45.7%-63.8%) of owners altered diets or supplements or both. The most common informational resource for dog diets was veterinarians (53.9%). Usage of home-prepared foods significantly increased after a cancer diagnosis (P = .03). There was no significant difference in commercial diet usage before or after a diagnosis (P = .25). Joint support products were the most common supplements given both before (37.4%) and after (35.0%) diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Many dog owners alter their dog's nutritional intake after a cancer diagnosis. These owners should be provided information relating to commonly observed alterations, including home-prepared foods and supplements.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão , Neoplasias , Médicos Veterinários , Cães , Animais , Humanos , Suplementos Nutricionais , Dieta/veterinária , Inquéritos e Questionários , Neoplasias/veterinária
2.
Vet Ophthalmol ; 23(4): 632-639, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32386123

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical safety and efficacy of adjunctive therapy using Vizoovet to ameliorate clinical signs of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) in dogs. ANIMALS STUDIED: Twenty client-owned dogs. PROCEDURES: Canine patients diagnosed with KCS were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were randomly selected to receive either Vizoovet or GenTeal drops twice daily in addition to twice daily tacrolimus 0.03% solution. Data were collected from only one eye of each patient and included STT-1, IOP, TFBUT, and results of objective clinical scoring performed by pet owners. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: In all, 20 dogs (20 eyes) were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Females (n = 12; 60%) outnumbered males (n = 8; 40%) and all dogs were spayed/neutered. Mean age of all dogs was 10.6 ± 3.79 years. In both treatment groups, the improvement in STT-1 values over the course of the study was significant (P = .002). When comparing the STT-1 improvements between groups, no significance was found (P = .78). In both groups, the improvement in TFBUT was significant (P = .0018). When comparing the TFBUT improvements between groups, no significance was found (P = .14). Squinting, rubbing, ocular discharge, and medication administration scores all significantly improved throughout the course of the study; however, they did not differ significantly between groups. Throughout the study, no adverse side effects were noted clinically or by the pet owner in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adjunctive treatment with Vizoovet was as safe and effective as GenTeal drops at improving clinical signs of dry eye in dogs.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Ceratoconjuntivite Seca/veterinária , Soluções Oftálmicas/uso terapêutico , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Animais , Doenças do Cão/patologia , Cães , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Ceratoconjuntivite Seca/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Soluções Oftálmicas/administração & dosagem , Linhagem , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 22(1): 32-7, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20813314

RESUMO

Lobar resection is currently the standard approach for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Sublobar resection is generally considered a compromise, reserved for high-risk patients because of greater rates of local recurrence compared with lobar resection. Adjuvant radiation therapy may decrease these increased local recurrence rates, but because of respiratory motion and difficulties in identifying the staple line, radiation delivery can be challenging with an external beam approach. Adjuvant intraoperative brachytherapy with the use of low-dose rate iodine-125 seeds placed alongside the surgical staple has been used with success in several centers. A randomized multicenter North American study has also recently completed accrual, but the results of this are not yet available. In the following review, we outline the techniques used, safety considerations, and currently available outcomes of sublobar resection with adjuvant brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/instrumentação , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Pneumonectomia/instrumentação , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA