Medication taking in a national sample of dependent older people.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is associated with inappropriate medication use, and subsequently increasing older persons' risk of drug-related harm and health-related costs to individuals and society. OBJECTIVE: To examine and describe, using a national sample of patient-level medication data, the prevalence of older people's polypharmacy and medication use across dependency levels. To examine oral and general pain prevalence and associated analgesic usage. METHODS: Medication data from the 2012 New Zealand Older People's Oral Health Survey, a nationally-representative, cross-sectional study of dependent older people's oral health, were analysed descriptively, comparing classes and sub-classes of drugs and nutrient supplements taken across four categories of dependency: very low (own homes receiving in-home support), low, high and psychogeriatric (all receiving aged residential care). Self-reported current general pain and frequency of orofacial pain data were cross-tabulated by sub-classes of analgesics taken. RESULTS: All participants were taking at least one medication overall, 53.2% (95% CI: 50.4, 56.0) took between five and nine (polypharmacy), and 13.9% (95% CI: 17.4, 22.5) took 10 or more (hyperpolypharmacy). Antihypertensives, analgesics, antiulcer drugs, aspirin, laxatives, statins and antidepressants were the most common drug classes taken, the proportions differing between psychogeriatric level care and all other dependency groups. Overall, simple analgesics were taken (34.5%; 95%CI: 30.8, 38.4) more commonly than other analgesics; the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was low (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.7, 4.7). Of those reporting experiencing extreme general bodily pain, 63.3% (95% CI: 56.6, 69.4) took an analgesic, more than those experiencing mouth pain occasionally or often. Fat-soluble vitamins were the most common vitamin supplement taken (32.0%; 95%CI: 27.0, 37.4). CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy are common among older people, regardless of dependency level, and pain may be undertreated.

Reducing hazard related falls in people 75 years and older with significant visual impairment: how did a successful program work?

BACKGROUND: In a randomized controlled trial testing a home safety program designed to prevent falls in older people with severe visual impairment, it was shown that the program, delivered by an experienced occupational therapist, significantly reduced the numbers of falls both at home and away from home. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the success of the home safety assessment and modification intervention in reducing falls resulted directly from modification of home hazards or from behavioral modifications, or both. METHODS: Participants were 391 community living women and men aged 75 years and older with visual acuity 6/24 meters or worse; 92% (361 of 391) completed one year of follow up. Main outcome measures were type and number of hazards and risky behavior identified in the home and garden of those receiving the home safety program, compliance with home safety recommendations reported at six months, location of all falls for all study participants during the trial, and environmental hazards associated with each fall. RESULTS: The numbers of falls at home related to an environmental hazard and those with no hazard involved were both reduced by the home safety program (n = 100 participants) compared with the group receiving social visits (n = 96) (incidence rate ratios = 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.74) and 0.43 (0.21 to 0.90), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The overall reduction in falls by the home safety program must result from some mechanism in addition to the removal or modification of hazards or provision of new equipment.

Does reported health promotion activity neglect people with ill-health?

Considering health as an alternative to ill-health ignores the multidimensionality of both concepts and invites neglect of health promotion as a multidimensional activity in persons with known ill-health. Drawing on the Ottawa Charter and Mäori perspectives of health, we interpret (ill) health according to people's ability to function in their environment by developing physical, psychological, social and spiritual resources for living. We use this framework to test empirically our hypothesis that although the concept of health promotion has always included people with ill-health, the practice of health promotion has continued to neglect them. Our exploratory review of articles published during 1989-99 and indexed on three electronic databases suggests widespread omission of people with ill-health from research on interventions for health promotion. Of 881 citations, approximately three-quarters included people without ill-health in any dimension. This finding could reflect a failure to include these people in health promotion, to describe activity to improve their health as health promotion, or both. Supporting the latter interpretation is uncertainty over the meaning of health, and the targeting of health promotion at groups at high risk of ill-health and 'all' persons. We need therefore to enable health promotion activity to include ill people explicitly.