Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Sleep Breath ; 24(3): 1051-1058, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811542

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the impact of myofunctional therapy support program (MTSP) based on self-efficacy theory compared to no support during myofunctional therapy (MT) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: Thirty-one patients with OSA were randomized into two groups: 12 weeks of treatment with the MTSP developed in this study (experimental group) and one education session of MT (control group). Patients were evaluated at the beginning and the end of the study using questionnaires (self-efficacy scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, snoring intensity and frequency, dry mouth) and polysomnography. RESULTS: The control (n = 15) and experimental (n = 16) groups had similar results for all variables at study entry. The control group showed no significant change in any variables during the study period. In contrast, the experimental group showed a significant increase in self-efficacy 61.38 ± 9.50 to 65.56 ± 10.89 (p = 0.020) and a significant decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 19.51 ± 11.41 to 14.11 ± 9.13 (p = 0.039), daytime sleepiness 9.88 ± 3.84 to 7.56 ± 3.42 (p = 0.028), snoring intensity 5.57 ± 3.13 to 4.44 ± 2.68 (p = 0.008), and dry mouth 6.44 ± 3.14 to 3.63 ± 2.33 (p = 0.005), compared to the baseline. No significant change in lowest SaO2 (p = 0.969), sleep quality (p = 0.307), and snoring frequency (p = 0.321) during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The intensive and interactive intervention of MTSP improved the self-efficacy of OSA patients, and consequently, resulted in sign and symptom relief, such as AHI, daytime sleepiness, snoring and dry mouth. The MTSP was dedicated to the nurse practitioner to improve the way to dispense the MT. This research has implications for the successful treatment of OSA.


Assuntos
Terapia Miofuncional , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Autoeficácia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/psicologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Polissonografia , Teoria Psicológica
2.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 38(4): 251-257, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31012599

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are chronic inflammatory diseases of airway and affect the disease severity each other. OBJECTIVE: We performed this study to examine whether nasal saline irrigation (NSI) improves bronchial hyperresponsiveness and clinical parameters in children with asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: We enrolled 20 children with AR and asthma aged between 6-18 years. Patients were randomized into two groups: irrigation group (8 boys and 2 girls) and control group (8 boys and 2 girls). The irrigation group performed daily NSI. All patients received 12-week treatment with montelukast, levocetirizine, and inhaled glucocorticoids. Provocative concentrations of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20), Asthma Control Test (ACT), the Questionnaire for Quality-of-Life Specific to Allergic Rhinitis in Korean Children (QQOL-ARK) and exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) were compared before and after the study. RESULTS: The PC20 at week 12 was higher than baseline measurements in the irrigation group (P = 0.017), while there was no difference in PC20 before and after treatment in the control group (P = 0.333). ACT score increased after 12 weeks of NSI (P = 0.007), while QQOL-ARK score decreased compared to baseline scores (P = 0.028) in the irrigation group. No differences in ACT and QQOL-ARK were found between weeks 0 and 12 in the control group. No differences were found in the median value of changes in PC20, ACT, QQOL-ARK and FENO between the irrigation and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that NSI is beneficial for treatment of asthma and AR in children.


Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Lavagem Nasal , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Solução Salina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Alérgenos/imunologia , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/etiologia , Biomarcadores , Criança , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização , Masculino , Lavagem Nasal/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Testes de Função Respiratória , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Yonsei Med J ; 60(10): 960-968, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538431

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Many studies have reported that pollen-food allergy syndrome (PFAS) can cause anaphylaxis. No comprehensive investigations into anaphylaxis in PFAS have been conducted, however. In this study, we investigated the clinical manifestations and risk factors for anaphylaxis in PFAS in Korean patients with pollinosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from a nationwide cross-sectional study that previously reported on PFAS in Korean patients with pollinosis. Data from 273 patients with PFAS were collected, including demographics, list of culprit fruits and vegetables, and clinical manifestations of food allergy. We analyzed 27 anaphylaxis patients and compared them with patients with PFAS with oropharyngeal symptoms only (n=130). RESULTS: The most common cause of anaphylaxis in PFAS was peanut (33.3%), apple (22.2%), walnut (22.2%), pine nut (18.5%), peach (14.8%), and ginseng (14.8%). Anaphylaxis was significantly associated with the strength of sensitization to alder, hazel, willow, poplar, timothy, and ragweed (p<0.05, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of atopic dermatitis [odds ratio (OR), 3.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25-10.23; p=0.017]; sensitization to hazel (OR, 5.27; 95% CI, 1.79-15.53; p=0.003), timothy (OR, 11.8; 95% CI, 2.70-51.64; p=0.001), or ragweed (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.03-9.87; p=0.045); and the number of culprit foods (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.37; p<0.001) were related to the development of anaphylaxis in PFAS. CONCLUSION: The most common culprit foods causing anaphylaxis in PFAS were peanut and apple. The presence of atopic dermatitis; sensitization to hazel, timothy, or ragweed; and a greater number of culprit foods were risk factors for anaphylaxis in PFAS.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome
4.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 2883, 2019 02 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30814581

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical administration of onion (Allium cepa) extract on nasal cavity for treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). BALB/c mice were sensitized by intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin (OVA) and challenged with intranasal instillation of OVA with or without onion extracts for five times a week on 3 consecutive weeks. Allergic symptom score according to frequencies of sneezing, serum total and OVA specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) level, cytokine levels of nasal mucosa and eosinophilic infiltration were analyzed. Allergic symptom score, serum total and OVA specific IgE, cytokine levels of nasal mucosa (interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IFN-γ, TNF-α and COX-2) and eosinophilic infiltration were higher in allergic mouse group than negative control group. Topical application of onion extracts significantly reduced allergic symptoms and OVA specific IgE levels. Cytokine levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13 and IFN-γ were significantly decreased in groups treated with onion extract. In addition, eosinophil infiltration of nasal turbinate mucosa was also significantly decreased after treatment with onion extract. Topical administration of onion extract significantly reduces allergic rhinitis symptom and allergic inflammatory reaction in a murine allergic model. It can be assumed that the topical application of onion extract regulates allergic symptoms by suppressing the type-1 helper (Th1) and type-2 helper (Th2) responses and reducing the allergic inflammatory reaction.


Assuntos
Citocinas/sangue , Eosinófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Inflamação/prevenção & controle , Cebolas/química , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Rinite Alérgica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Tópica , Animais , Eosinófilos/imunologia , Eosinófilos/metabolismo , Feminino , Inflamação/imunologia , Inflamação/patologia , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Ovalbumina/toxicidade , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Rinite Alérgica/induzido quimicamente , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/patologia
5.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 41(1): 46-9, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23932052

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate compliance with and effectiveness of nasal irrigation in children with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and to assess its clinical course. METHODS: Seventy-seven children with refractory CRS resistant to medical treatment including antibiotics and nasal corticosteroids were included. We evaluated patients' nasal symptom and Lund Mackay CT scores at baseline. All patients were educated about nasal irrigation and encouraged to perform nasal irrigation 1-3 times a day. After 1 month, patients were reevaluated regarding compliance with the protocol and improvement of CRS by assessing symptom score and endoscopic evaluation. The patients were followed up for at least two months to assess need for further treatment including surgery. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 8.3 years ranging from 4 to 13 years. Mean follow-up duration with nasal saline irrigation was 6.2 months (2-32 months). Forty nine patients (63.6%) successfully carried out nasal irrigation during follow-up (good compliance [GC] group) and 28 patients (36.4%) did not successfully carry out nasal irrigation (poor compliance [PC] group). There were no significant differences between GC and PC groups regarding clinical characteristics and baseline Lund-MacKay CT scores. Subjective and objective improvements were observed in 36 patients (73.5%) in the GC group and 14 patients (50.0%) in the PC group. Surgery including endoscopic sinus surgery and/or adenoidectomy was performed in 8 patients (16.3%) in the GC group and 12 patients (42.9%) in the PC group. The rate of surgical treatment was significantly different between the groups (p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Nasal irrigation in children with long standing CRS is relatively well tolerated (63.6%) and effective. Nasal saline irrigation should be considered as a primary treatment tool in CRS even in pediatric age group.


Assuntos
Lavagem Nasal/métodos , Cooperação do Paciente , Rinite/terapia , Sinusite/terapia , Adenoidectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Seios Paranasais/diagnóstico por imagem , Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinite/diagnóstico por imagem , Sinusite/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA