Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anticancer Res ; 35(9): 4983-96, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26254398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies of selenium and vitamin E, two antioxidants hypothesized to reduce prostate cancer risk, have shown no discernible benefit. It has been proposed, however, that tobacco smoking may modify the effect of these nutrients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of studies evaluating the relation of vitamin E and selenium exposure to prostate cancer risk in never smokers vs. ever smokers and, when feasible, former and current smokers. Overall and stratum-specific meta-risk ratios (meta-RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies have met the inclusion criteria. Meta-RR (95% CI) estimates of prostate cancer associated with vitamin E use were 1.03 (0.95-1.11) in never smokers and 0.98 (0.90-1.07) in ever-smokers. For selenium, meta-RRs were 1.09 (0.78-1.52 and 0.76 (0.60-0.96) for never and ever-smokers, respectively; however, results for current smokers were weaker than those for former smokers. Sub-analyses according to different exposure assessment methods and outcome definitions produced similar results across strata. CONCLUSION: The association between vitamin E and prostate cancer is not modified by smoking. Selenium exposure is associated with lower prostate cancer risk among ever-smokers; however, the lack of an association for current smokers indicates that this finding needs to be interpreted with caution.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Selênio/farmacologia , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Vitamina E/farmacologia , Humanos , Masculino , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Clin Lipidol ; 8(6): 640-643, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25499948

RESUMO

ß-blockers are commonly used therapies after acute myocardial infarction and in the management of congestive heart failure and hypertension. We report a case of a middle-aged woman with a history of mild hypertension who was placed on metoprolol succinate. Before initiation of the ß-blocker, her triglyceride level was in the borderline-high range (150-199 mg/dL). On treatment, her triglyceride levels exceeded 1000 mg/dL. She developed fatigue and mild abdominal discomfort but without biochemical evidence of pancreatitis. After discontinuation of metoprolol succinate, her triglyceride levels receded. This case illustrates an uncommon side effect with a very commonly used therapy in clinical practice. Clinicians should closely evaluate medications and/or other therapies in patients presenting with new-onset hypertriglyceridemia especially when levels are sufficiently elevated to pose increased risk of pancreatitis.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3/administração & dosagem , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertrigliceridemia/prevenção & controle , Metoprolol/análogos & derivados , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertrigliceridemia/etiologia , Metoprolol/efeitos adversos , Metoprolol/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Triglicerídeos/sangue , Suspensão de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA