Optimal trough concentration of teicoplanin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin ) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 µg/ml for difficult-to-treat complicated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 µg/ml is required for non-complicated MRSA infections. Considering the low incidence of nephrotoxicity for teicoplanin, Cmin  = 15-30 µg/ml has been suggested for most MRSA infections. Thus, we assessed the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of teicoplanin at this target Cmin . METHODS: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi-Web) to identify eligible studies. Studies were included if they provided the incidence of treatment success, mortality in patients with MRSA infection, and/or hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity according to the Cmin range. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Four trials assessing clinical success (n = 299) and three studies assessing adverse effects (n = 546) were included. Cmin  = 15-30 µg/ml significantly increased the probability of treatment success compared with Cmin  < 15 µg/ml (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-6.32, p = 0.02). The all-cause mortality rate did not differ between the groups (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.13-1.61, p = 0.22). Cmin  = 15-30 µg/ml did not increase the risks of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.49-1.69, p = 0.76) or hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.18-2.44, p = 0.54). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Teicoplanin therapy using a Cmin target of 15-30 µg/ml is likely to be associated with better clinical responses than Cmin  < 15 µg/ml without increasing the risk of adverse effects.

The monitoring of vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analyses of area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing and trough-guided dosing.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the relationship between vancomycin (VCM) monitoring strategies and VCM effectiveness and safety. METHODS: We conducted our analysis using the MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases searched on August 9, 2020. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Adult patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia with VCM trough concentrations ≥15 µg/mL had significantly lower treatment failure rates (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.85). The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) increased with increased trough concentrations and was significantly higher for trough concentrations ≥20 µg/mL compared to those at 15-20 µg/mL (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.78-3.20). Analysis of the target area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ratios (AUC/MIC) showed significantly lower treatment failure rates for high AUC/MIC (cut-off 400 ± 15%) (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18-0.45). The safety analysis revealed that high AUC value (cut-off 600 ± 15%) significantly increased the risk of AKI (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.13-3.89). Our meta-analysis of differences in monitoring strategies included four studies. The incidence of AKI tended to be lower in AUC-guided monitoring than in trough-guided monitoring (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.28-1.01); however, it was not significant in the analysis of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We identified VCM trough concentrations and AUC values that correlated with effectiveness and safety. Furthermore, compared to trough-guided monitoring, AUC-guided monitoring showed potential for decreasing nephrotoxicity.