Inducible atrial tachycardias with multiple circuits in a stepwise approach are associated with increased episodes of atrial tachycardias after catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachycardia (AT) is commonly observed during catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing a stepwise extensive CA. In this study, we examined the hypothesis that the presence of multiple inducible ATs (multiple-ATs), which allow for latent multiple reentrant circuits, might increase the potential for following AT episodes after CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 347 consecutive AF patients undergoing CA with a stepwise approach. A total of 366 ATs (tricuspid isthmus dependent, 101; mitral annulus, 62; septal, 26; roof dependent, 22; left atrial anterior wall, 13; upper loop, 8; surrounding the left pulmonary veins, 6; surrounding the right pulmonary veins, 6; left atrial appendage, 4; and Cs ostium, 3) occurring during the CA were found in 216 (62.2%) of 347 patients. Multiple-ATs (≥2) during the CA were observed in 93 (26.8%) of 347 patients. The incidence of AT episodes significantly increased as the number of inducible ATs increased (no AT, 7.8%; single AT, 13.7%; and multiple-ATs, 24.2%; P < .001), and multiple-ATs were an independent risk factor for AT episodes (3.07 [1.39-6.78]; P = .005). The impact of the multiple-ATs on the AT episodes was pronounced especially in the patients with coinducible residual AF (with coresidual AF vs without coresidual AF, 8.1% vs 47.7%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an atrial substrate allowing for multiple-ATs was associated with increased AT episodes during follow-up.

Local coronary flow is associated with an unsuccessful complete block line at the mitral isthmus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The addition of a mitral isthmus (MI) block line after pulmonary vein isolation could lead to a favorable outcome of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is sometimes tough to create a complete MI block line, and the cooling effect because of the local coronary flow may prevent the creation of a successful MI block line. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study enrolled 81 AF patients in whom the creation of an MI block line was attempted in those with persistent or pacing-inducible AF after pulmonary vein isolation. A local coronary artery (LCA) across the MI block line was observed in 43 (53%) of 81 patients, and a bidirectional MI block was successfully accomplished in 53 (65%) of 81 patients, at the estimated MI line. The ratio of a successful MI block line was significantly lower in the patients with an LCA than in those without an LCA (42% versus 92%; P<0.001). The mean diameter of the coronary sinus (0.59 ± 0.18 versus 0.82 ± 0.22 cm; P<0.001) and length of the estimated MI line (33.4 ± 9.9 versus 29.4 ± 7.1 mm; P=0.032) were significantly shorter in the patients with a successful MI block line than in those without a successful MI block line. In the multivariable analysis, an LCA at the MI and a larger coronary sinus diameter were independent risk factors for an unsuccessful MI block line. CONCLUSIONS: Local coronary flow at the MI is associated with an increased incidence of an unsuccessful MI block line.