Clinical outcomes according to lesion complexity in patients with high bleeding risk treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy following pci: analysis from the onyx one clear study

BACKGROUND Safety and effectiveness outcomes were examined at 1 year among high bleeding risk (HBR) patients treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following PCI with zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) (Resolute Onyx, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Califor nia) according to lesion complexity (Table). METHODS The 1-year clinical outcomes were evaluated in HBR pa tients treated with ZES who were event-free following 1-month DAPT post-procedure with planned single antiplatelet therapy thereafter. Propensity score adjustment was performed to account for baseline differences (Table). RESULTS A total of 1,506 patients were stratified by complex (n » 395) or noncomplex (n » 1,111) PCI criteria (Table). Complex patients were more frequently men (72.2% vs. 66.1%; p » 0.03) and had higher rates of prior myocardial infarction (MI) (34.4% vs. 23.4%), prior CABG (24.1% vs. 8.9%), multivessel disease (78.2% vs. 39.8%), and B2/C lesion classification (84.2% vs. 75.6%), all p < 0.001. Complex patients had more lesions treated (1.7 vs. 1.2), longer stent length per patient (65.1 mm vs. 26.9 mm), and longer procedure time (58.8 min vs. 35.3 min), all p < 0.001. Procedural success was higher among noncomplex patients (90.8% vs. 82.0%; p < 0.001). In unadjusted analysis, the rate of MI was higher in patients with complex lesions (p » 0.04). How ever, no significant differences in any outcomes between patients with and without complex lesions were present after propensity score adjustment (Table). CONCLUSION Despite greater anatomic and procedural complexity, similar safety and effectiveness were observed in complex and noncomplex patients treated with 1-month DAPT following PCI with Resolute Onyx ZES after propensity score adjustment. These findings support 1-month DAPT among selected HBR patients undergoing PCI with Resolute Onyx ZES irrespective of lesion and procedural complexity.

Device-based therapies for arterial hypertension.

Arterial hypertension is the most prevalent modifiable risk factor associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although antihypertensive drugs are widely available, in many patients blood pressure control to guideline-recommended target values is not achieved. Several device-based approaches have been introduced to lower blood pressure; most of these strategies aim to modulate autonomic nervous system activity. Clinical trials have moved from including patients with resistant hypertension receiving intensive pharmacological treatment to including patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in the presence or absence of antihypertensive medications. Renal sympathetic denervation is the most extensively investigated device-based therapy for hypertension, and randomized, sham-controlled trials have provided proof-of-principle data for its blood pressure-lowering efficacy. Unilateral electrical baroreflex activation, endovascular baroreflex amplification and pacemaker-mediated cardiac neuromodulation therapy have yielded promising results in observational trials, which need to be confirmed in larger, adequately powered, sham-controlled trials. Until further evidence becomes available, device-based therapy for hypertension should not be considered for routine treatment. However, when considering a device-based treatment for hypertension, the underlying pathophysiology in each patient has to be taken into consideration, and the procedural risks weighed against the cardiovascular risk attributable to the elevated blood pressure. This Review summarizes the pathophysiological rationale and the latest clinical evidence for device-based therapies for hypertension.

Prediction of coronary risk by SYNTAX and derived scores: synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery.

The introduction of the SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score has prompted a renewed interest for angiographic risk stratification in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Syntax score is based on qualitative and quantitative characterization of coronary artery disease by including 11 angiographic variables that take into consideration lesion location and characteristics. Thus far, this score has been shown to be an effective tool to risk-stratify patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the landmark SYNTAX trial, as well as in other clinical settings. This review provides an overview of its current applications, including its integration with other nonangiographic clinical scores, and explores future applications of the SYNTAX and derived scores.