Frequency and relevance of psychoeducation in psychiatric diagnoses: results of two surveys five years apart in German-speaking European countries.

BACKGROUND: Psychoeducation has been shown to reduce relapse rates in several psychiatric disorders. Studies investigating for which psychiatric diagnoses psychoeducation is offered and assessing its perceived relevance compared to other interventions are lacking. METHODS: A two-part questionnaire addressing these questions was sent to the heads of all psychiatric hospitals in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Results were compared with those from a similar survey 5 years earlier. RESULTS: 289 of 500 (58%) institutions responded. Significantly (p = 0,02) more institutions (93%) offer any type of psychoeducation as compared to 5 years before (86%). Psychoeducation is mainly offered for schizophrenia (86%) and depression (67%) and less frequently for anxiety disorders (18%) and substance abuse (17%). For the following specific diagnoses it is offered by less than 10% of the institutions: Personality disorder, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, dementia, obsessive compulsive disorder, sleeping disorders, eating disorders, schizophrenia plus substance abuse, pain, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and early psychosis. 25% offer diagnosis-unspecific psychoeducation. 'Pharmacotherapy' (99%), 'basic occupational therapy' (95%) and 'psychoeducation for patients' (93%) were the therapies being most often, 'light therapy' (24%) and 'sleep deprivation' (16%) the therapies being least often perceived as relevant by the respondents when asked about the value of different interventions offered in their hospitals. Art therapy (61%) and psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy (59%), two therapies with a smaller evidence base than light therapy or sleep deprivation, were perceived as relevant by more than the half of the respondents. CONCLUSION: Psychoeducation for patients is considered relevant and offered frequently in German-speaking countries, however, mostly only for schizophrenia and depression. The ranking of the perceived relevance of different treatment options suggests that the evidence base is not considered crucial for determining their relevance.

[Satisfaction with an integrated care program for outpatients with schizophrenia or depression]. / Patientenzufriedenheit mit einem Programm der Integrierten Versorgung für die Indikationen Schizophrenie und Depression.

OBJECTIVE: To study out-patients' perception of an Integrated Care compliance program. METHODS: Survey of patients enrolled in the Integrated Care program "Münchner Modell" in Munich, Germany. RESULTS: N = 121 patients participated in the survey. Overall patients were very satisfied with the Integrated Care program. They reported improvements in several areas of life. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the aspects of routine patient care that still need to be improved and shows how these deficits can be addressed by Integrated Care programs.

'What would you do if you were me, doctor?': randomised trial of psychiatrists' personal v. professional perspectives on treatment recommendations.

BACKGROUND: If patients are unsure whether a specific treatment is really good for them, they often pose the question, 'What would you do if you were me, doctor?' Patients want their psychiatrists to put themselves in their shoes and not to give a 'standard recommendation'. AIMS: To study whether this question really leads psychiatrists to reveal their personal preferences. METHOD: Randomised experimental study with 515 psychiatrists incorporating two decision scenarios (depression scenario: antidepressant v. watchful waiting; schizophrenia scenario: depot v. oral antipsychotic) and three experimental conditions (giving a recommendation to a patient asking, 'What would you do if you were me, doctor?'; giving a regular recommendation to a patient without being asked this question; and imagining being ill and deciding for yourself). Main outcome measures were the treatments chosen or recommended by physicians. RESULTS: Psychiatrists choosing treatment for themselves predominantly selected other treatments (mostly watchful waiting and oral antipsychotics respectively) than what psychiatrists recommended to patients when asked in the 'regular recommendation role' (i.e. antidepressant and depot respectively). Psychiatrists in the 'what-would-you-do role' gave recommendations similar to the 'regular recommendation role' (depression scenario: χ(2) = 0.12, P = 0.73; schizophrenia scenario: χ(2) = 2.60, P = 0.11) but distinctly different from the 'self role'. CONCLUSIONS: The question 'What would you do if you were me, doctor?' does not motivate psychiatrists to leave their professional recommendation role and to take a more personal perspective. Psychiatrists should try to find out why individuals are asking this question and, together with the individual, identify the most appropriate treatment option.