[Reimbursement in psychiatry and psychosomatics: proof of concept for a system based on daily costs]. / Vergütungssystem für Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik: Studie zur Machbarkeit eines tageskostenbasierten Entgeltsystems.

BACKGROUND: In Germany a new reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics is under development. Based on total costs of each case from selected hospitals and day clinics, in 2013 the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) proposed to reimburse the hospital costs daily with step-wise decreasing remuneration, mainly depending on the ICD-10 diagnosis, duration of stay and some complicating factors (PEPP grouper). It is controversial whether this degressive system will result in an inadequate remuneration of patients with longer duration of severe symptoms, such as suicidality in depression or autoaggressive behavior in borderline personality disorder and will eventually lead to advantages for acutely ill patients with short duration of stay compared to chronically ill patients. OBJECTIVES: This study formulated and tested an alternative remuneration system (proof of concept) mainly based on an analysis of daily cost data instead of the total costs of each case. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is based on 147,749 treatment days from 4,633 cases of patients with psychotic disorders (PEPP-PA03) in 6 hospitals. As possible cost separating factors the study analyzed days with and without intensive psychiatric care, 1 to 1 care, psychological diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acute crisis intervention, age at admission, the first days of treatment and day of discharge. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Nearly all factors tested were shown to be statistically significant in separating daily hospital costs. Based on these findings an alternative calculation algorithm (TEPPconcret), which grouped the cases with respect to age, intensive care, 1 to 1 care, treatment days 1-4 and day of discharge, was formulated and tested. For psychotic disorders TEPPconcret with a basic rate complemented by daily add-on payments depending on the effort involved, is a serious alternative to the PEPP system and awaits further evaluation.

[A new method for the treatment of depression: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation]. / Ein neues Behandlungsverfahren der Depression: Die repetitive transkranielle Magnetstimulation (rTMS).

Recent data suggest that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in treating depressive symptoms to a lesser extent compared with classical electroconvulsive therapy. However, rTMS represents an economical and well tolerable procedure in relation to the expenditure of electroconvulsive therapy with anaesthesia. Usually, rTMS is applicated as an add-on-therapy accompanying psychopharmacological treatment. So far, it has predominantly been used for patients with long-standing and so called treatment-refractory symptoms. However, even in the early phase of a depressive episode rTMS would be possibly more effective. In many cases, the standard procedure-application of up to 10 rTMS-sessions will not be enough to produce therapeutic benefit. Therefore rTMS series including up to 20 sessions are recommended. Long-term studies are needed to clarify the role of rTMS for relapse prevention and to determine the optimal frequency and duration of rTMS in such an indication. Although numerous results of newer studies suggest a moderate antidepressive effect of rTMS, its application in daily clinical routine practice cannot be recommended yet. Larger, accurate designed and controlled studies, especially involving patients of old age, are needed to evaluate the true tolerability and effectiveness of rTMS as a new treatment option for depressive symptoms.