Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 54(8): 851-8, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25647628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Circadian rhythms may influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs. This study aimed to elucidate whether the pharmacokinetics of the orally administered drug sunitinib are subject to circadian variation. METHODS: We performed studies in male FVB-mice aged 8-12 weeks, treated with single-dose sunitinib at six dosing times. Plasma and tissue samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis and to monitor messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. A prospective randomized crossover study was performed in which patients took sunitinib once daily at 8 a.m., 1 p.m., and 6 p.m at three subsequent courses. Patients were blindly randomized into two groups, which determined the sequence of the sunitinib dosing time. The primary endpoint in both studies was the difference in plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of sunitinib and its active metabolite SU12662 between dosing times. RESULTS: Sunitinib and SU12662 plasma AUC in mice followed an ~12-h rhythm as a function of administration time (p ≤ 0.04). The combined AUC from time zero to 10 h (AUC10) was 14-27 % higher when sunitinib was administered at 4 a.m. and 4 p.m. than at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Twenty-four-hour rhythms were seen in the mRNA levels of drug transporters and metabolizing enzymes. In 12 patients, sunitinib trough concentrations (C trough) were higher when the drug was taken at 1 p.m. or 6 p.m. than when taken at 8 a.m. (C trough-1 p.m. 66.0 ng/mL; C trough-6 p.m. 58.9 ng/mL; C trough-8 a.m. 50.7 ng/mL; p = 0.006). The AUC was not significantly different between dosing times. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that sunitinib pharmacokinetics follow an ~12-h rhythm in mice. In humans, morning dosing resulted in lower C trough values, probably resulting from differences in elimination. This can have implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/farmacocinética , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Idoso , Animais , Antineoplásicos/sangue , Cronoterapia/métodos , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiologia , Estudos Cross-Over , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/sangue , Masculino , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirróis/sangue , Sunitinibe
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA