Controlling Nutritional Status Score Serves as a Prognosticator in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Optimal Timing of Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Usefulness of various nutritional indices for management of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been reported. Although Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is among promising indices to predict outcome, the optimal timing for its measurement during the perioperative period remains unknown. Here the prognostic value of the CONUT score was assessed among patients with ESCC. METHODS: We analyzed 464 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy of ESCC, of which 276 patients were treated with neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). The significance of the associations between candidate parameters including the CONUT score and postoperative prognosis were evaluated. RESULT: Among the 25 candidate predictors, the preoperative CONUT score had the highest correlation with overall survival (OS) after surgery. Patients were categorized as follows: normal, mild, and moderate or severe, on the basis of the preoperative CONUT score. OS was significantly shortened as the CONUT score worsened. Multivariable analysis revealed that the CONUT scores of the subgroups mild (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.69) and moderate or severe (HR 2.18) were independent predictors of poor prognosis for OS. Furthermore, in an analysis limited to patients who underwent NAT, OS was significantly shortened as the preoperative CONUT score worsened. On the contrary, there was no significant difference in RFS among patient groups stratified by the CONUT score determined before NAT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the preoperative CONUT score serves as a prognosticator in resectable ESCC. The preoperative CONUT value was more useful than that before NAT in patients administered NAT.

Prognostic significance of NY-ESO-1 antigen and PIGR expression in esophageal tumors of CHP-NY-ESO-1-vaccinated patients as adjuvant therapy.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and the biomarkers of the CHP-NY-ESO-1 vaccine complexed with full-length NY-ESO-1 protein and a cholesteryl pullulan (CHP) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after surgery. We conducted a randomized phase II trial. Fifty-four patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing ESCC who underwent radical surgery following cisplatin/5-fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assigned to receive either CHP-NY-ESO-1 vaccination or observation as control. Six doses of CHP-NY-ESO-1 were administered subcutaneously once every two weeks, followed by nine more doses once every four weeks. The endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and safety. Exploratory analysis of tumor tissues using gene-expression profiles was also performed to seek the biomarker. As there were no serious adverse events in 27 vaccinated patients, we verified the safety of the vaccine. DFS in 2 years were 56.0% and 58.3% in the vaccine arm and in the control, respectively. Twenty-four of 25 patients showed NY-ESO-1-specific IgG responses after vaccination. Analysis of intra-cohort correlations among vaccinated patients revealed that 5% or greater expression of NY-ESO-1 was a favorable factor. Comprehensive analysis of gene expression profiles revealed that the expression of the gene encoding polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR) in tumors had a significantly favorable impact on outcomes in the vaccinated cohort. The high PIGR-expressing tumors that had higher NY-ESO-1-specific IgA response tended to have favorable prognosis. These results suggest that PIGR would play a major role in tumor immunity in an antigen-specific manner during NY-ESO-1 vaccinations. The IgA response may be relevant.

The survival impact of preoperative FOLFOX for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer: the R-NAC-01 study.

PURPOSE: In this follow-up of the R-NAC-01 study, we assessed the long-term oncological benefit of four courses of modified leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil (FU), and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) chemotherapy before rectal surgery. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study (UMIN 000012559) involving 11 hospitals in Japan, patients with lower rectal cancer underwent four cycles of mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy and subsequent surgery within four to six weeks. The 3-year recurrence-free survival and local recurrence rates were then reported. RESULTS: Of 41 patients (36 males, 5 females; mean age: 60.8 years old) who received 4 courses of chemotherapy, 40 underwent total mesorectal excision, and 1 underwent total pelvic exenteration. R0 resection was achieved in 40 patients, but none showed a pathological complete response. Twenty-nine patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for an average of 4 months. The 3 year recurrence-free survival and local recurrence rates in patients undergoing curable resection were 72.8% and 8.5%, respectively. cStage III patients with adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly higher 3 year recurrence-free survival than those without adjuvant chemotherapy (76.6 vs. 40.0%, log-rank p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Four courses of mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy before surgery may be a promising treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy might be needed for cStage III patients, even after four courses of neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6.

A prospective trial to evaluate treatment effects of a ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate containing nutrient for leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased medical cost. Additionally, it sometimes leads to a fatal condition and impaired postoperative quality of life. During the process of wound healing, ß-hydroxy-ß-methylbutyrate (HMB) is important for collagen biosynthesis. An open-label prospective intervention trial has been designed to evaluate the treatment effect of an enteral nutrient containing HMB with arginine and glutamine (Abound, Abbott Japan Co., Ltd.) for leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy. Patients in whom leakage at the anastomotic site developed within 14 days after esophagectomy are eligible and Abound (24 g) is administered for 14 days through an enteral feeding tube. The target sample size is 10. The primary endpoint is duration between diagnosis and cure of leakage. Surgical procedure, safety, length of fasting, drainage placement and hospital stay, and nutritional status are determined as secondary endpoints. A historical control consisting of 20 patients who had leakage at the anastomotic site after esophagectomy between 2005 and 2018 at Nagoya University Hospital is compared with enrolled patients.

Biological and conditional factors should be included when defining criteria for resectability for patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate novel resectability criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) proposed by the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) by comparing them with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. METHODS: 369 patients who underwent upfront surgery for PDAC were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) of each group as defined by either of the guidelines were compared and preoperative prognostic factors for OS were identified. RESULTS: Based on the IAP-criteria, 157 patients were classified as resectable (R), 192 as borderline resectable (BR) and 20 as unresectable (UR), with the median survival time (MST) of 40 months, 17 and 11, respectively. In contrast to the NCCN-criteria, BR demonstrated significantly better OS than UR (P = 0.023) under the IAP-criteria. Performance status ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.47, P = 0.014) and lymph node metastasis suspected by imaging (HR: 1.55, P = 0.003) were identified as independent prognostic factors by the multivariate analysis along with portal or arterial invasion, while carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥ 500 U/ml was not (HR: 1.23, P = 0.190). CONCLUSION: The IAP-criteria, which includes biological and conditional factors, resulted in superior separation of survival curves stratified by the resectablity when compared with the NCCN-criteria.

Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Nutritional Status in Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The association between neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and nutritional status in pancreatic cancer (PC) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of NAT on nutritional status. METHODS: Overall, 161 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for PC between August 2010 and March 2017 were enrolled and were divided into two groups: the neoadjuvant group (NAG; n = 67) and the control group (CG; n = 94). Based on relative dose intensity (RDI), patients in the NAG group were further divided into RDI ≥ 80% (n = 39) and RDI < 80% (n = 19). Changes in nutritional index, inflammatory index, and inflammation-based prognostic scores during NAT and the perioperative period were assessed. RESULTS: Retinol-binding protein, prealbumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prognostic nutrition index significantly worsened in the NAG after NAT (p = 0.007, p = 0.03, p = 0.04, p = 0.007, and p = 0.004, respectively). The recovery of rapid turnover proteins after postoperative day 5 was significantly worse in the NAG compared with the CG (p < 0.05), but tended to be more prompt in the RDI ≥ 80% group among the NAG. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and time to postoperative adjuvant therapy between the NAG and the CG. CONCLUSIONS: NAT for PC could aggravate nutritional status and hamper its postoperative recovery. Furthermore, malnutrition might decrease tolerance of NAT. These findings suggest the importance of nutritional support for patients with NAT in PC.

Evaluation and proposal of novel resectability criteria for pancreatic cancer established by the Japan Pancreas Society.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines for the classification of the resectability of pancreatic cancer established by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network can be difficult to utilize in clinical practice. We evaluated novel criteria proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society. METHODS: We analyzed 382 patients with pancreatic cancer between 2001 and 2015 for survival differences among subgroups classified according to the Japan Pancreas Society classification. Overall survival and disease-free survival were expressed as median values and compared with data based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network classification, and differences in initial patterns of recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall survival times according to the Japan Pancreas Society criteria were 34.2, 29.7, 17.3, 14.3, and 15.8 months for the groups defined as resectable, resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with arterial invasion, and unresectable by locally advanced disease respectively. The overall survival of the resectable group was better than those of the borderline resectable with portal vein invasion or borderline resectable with arterial invasion groups (P < .0001); however, the borderline resectable with portal vein invasion, borderline resectable with arterial invasion, and unresectable by locally advanced groups showed no differences in overall survival. The resectable group showed a tendency toward better survival than the resectable with portal vein invasion group (P = .058). The median overall survival times according to the classic 2012 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were 30.5, 20.5, 15.8, and 13.8 months for the resectable, portal invasion, common hepatic artery and superior mesenteric artery invasion groups, respectively. Each survival curve was clearly separate. The borderline resectable with arterial invasion and unresectable by locally advanced groups exhibited high local recurrence rates (42.0% and 44.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Japan Pancreas Society criteria, which are simpler, predicted survival differences between the resectable group and the other subgroups. Our data suggest that cancer patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (borderline resectable with portal vein invasion and borderline resectable with arterial invasion) can be managed as a single subset.