RESUMO
Introduction: Internal quality control (IQC) is a core pillar of laboratory quality control strategies. Internal quality control commercial materials lack the same characteristics as patient samples and IQC contributes to the costs of laboratory testing. Patient data-based quality control (PDB-QC) may be a valuable supplement to IQC; the smaller the biological variation, the stronger the ability to detect errors. Using the potassium concentration in serum as an example study compared error detection effectiveness between PDB-QC and IQC. Materials and methods: Serum potassium concentrations were measured by using an indirect ion-selective electrode method. For the training database, 23,772 patient-generated data and 366 IQC data from April 2022 to September 2022 were used; 15,351 patient-generated data and 246 IQC data from October 2022 to January 2023 were used as the testing database. For both PDB-QC and IQC, average values and standard deviations were calculated, and z-score charts were plotted for comparison purposes. Results: Five systematic and three random errors were detected using IQC. Nine systematic errors but no random errors were detected in PDB-QC. The PDB-QC showed systematic error warnings earlier than the IQC. Conclusions: The daily average value of patient-generated data was superior to IQC in terms of the efficiency and timeliness of detecting systematic errors but inferior to IQC in detecting random errors.