RESUMO
The continuing challenges that limit effectiveness of tumor therapeutic vaccines were high heterogeneity of tumor immunogenicity, low bioactivity of antigens, as well as insufficient lymph nodes (LNs) drainage of antigens and adjuvants. Transportation of in situ neoantigens and adjuvants to LNs may be an effective approach to solve the abovementioned problems. Therefore, an FA-TSL/AuNCs/SV nanoplatform was constructed by integrating simvastatin (SV) adjuvant loaded Au nanocages (AuNCs) as cores (AuNCs/SV) and folic acid modified thermal-sensitive liposomes (FA-TSL) as shells to enhance de novo antitumor immunity. After accumulation in tumor guided by FA, AuNCs mediated photothermal therapy (PTT) induced the release of tumor-derived protein antigens (TDPAs) and the shedding of FA-TSL. Exposed AuNCs/SV soon captured TDPAs to form in situ recombinant vaccine (AuNCs/SV/TDPAs). Subsequently, AuNCs/SV/TDPAs could efficiently transport to draining LNs owing to the hyperthermia induced vasodilation effect and small particle size, achieving co-delivery of antigens and adjuvant for initiation of specific T cell response. In melanoma bearing mice, FA-TSL/AuNCs/SV and laser irradiation effectively ablated primary tumor, against metastatic tumors and induced immunological memory. This approach served a hyperthermia enhanced platform drainage to enable robust personalized cancer vaccination.
RESUMO
Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB)-related health care-associated ventriculitis and meningitis (HCAVM) is dangerous. We aimed to report the antimicrobial resistance of the pathogens, treatment, and outcome. All cases with CRGNB-related HCAVM in2012-2020 were recruited. Antimicrobial agents were classified as active, untested, or inactive using antimicrobial susceptibility tests. The treatment stage was classified as empirical or targeted according to the report of pathogens. The treatment effect was classified as ineffective or effective according to HCAVM-related parameters. Overall, 92 cases were recruited. For most antimicrobial agents, the resistance rate was higher than 70.0%. The polymyxin resistance rate was the lowest at 11.6%. The chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, amikacin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline resistance rates were relatively low, ranging from 21.1% to 64.1%. The meropenem resistance rate was 81.9%. There was no significant trend for any antimicrobial agent tested. Meropenem was the most common antimicrobial agent used in empirical treatment; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and polymyxin were the most used active antimicrobial agents, and meropenem/sulbactam and polymyxin were the most used untested antimicrobial agents in targeted treatment. In total, 42 (45.7%) cases received ineffective treatments. The ineffective treatment rate of cases that received active antimicrobial agents was lower than that of cases that received untested antimicrobial agents and cases that received inactive antimicrobial agents (29.3% [12/41] versus 46.2% [18/39] versus 100.0% [12/12], P < 0.001). Antimicrobial resistance was prevalent but without increasing trends. Active antimicrobial agents are necessary. Additionally, untested antimicrobial agents, including meropenem/sulbactam and polymyxin, might be optional. Inactive antimicrobial agents must be replaced. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related health care-associated ventriculitis and meningitis is a clinical threat because of the poor outcome and challenges in treatment. We reached several conclusions: (i) the antimicrobial resistance of pathogens is severe, and some antimicrobial agents represented by polymyxin are optional according to the antimicrobial susceptibility tests; (ii) in the background that the portion of carbapenems resistance in Gram-negative bacteria is increasing, there is no increasing trend for the antimicrobial resistance of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in the 9-year study; (iii) meropenem is the main antimicrobial agent in treatment, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tigecycline, polymyxin, and meropenem/sulbactam are commonly used in the targeted treatment; (iv) the treatment effect was poor and affected by the treatment: timely active antimicrobial agents should be given. And untested antimicrobial agents represented by polymyxin and meropenem/sulbactam might be optional. Inactive antimicrobial agents must be replaced.