Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study.

Despite compulsory health insurance in Europe, ethnic differences in access to health care exist. The objective of this study is to investigate how ethnic differences between Dutch and non-Dutch women with respect to late entry into antenatal care provided by community midwifes can be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Data were obtained from the Generation R Study. The Generation R Study is a multi-ethnic population-based prospective cohort study conducted in the city of Rotterdam. In total, 2,093 pregnant women with a Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish, Cape Verdean, Antillean, Surinamese Creole and Surinamese Hindustani background were included in this study. We examined whether ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry could be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent role of explanatory variables in the timing of antenatal care entry. The main outcome measure was late entry into antenatal care (gestational age at first visit after 14 weeks). With the exception of Surinamese-Hindustani women, the percentage of mothers entering antenatal care late was higher in all non-Dutch compared to Dutch mothers. We could explain differences between Turkish (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.57-1.58), Cape Verdean (OR = 1.65. CI: 0.96-2.82) and Dutch women. Other differences diminished but remained significant (Moroccan: OR = 1,74, CI: 1.07-2.85; Dutch Antillean OR 1.80, CI: 1.04-3.13). We found that non-Dutch mothers were more likely to enter antenatal care later than Dutch mothers. Because we are unable to explain fully the differences regarding Moroccan, Surinamese-Creole and Antillean women, future research should focus on differences between 1st and 2nd generation migrants, as well as on language barriers that may hinder access to adequate information about the Dutch obstetric system.

Supervised integrated screening of low-back pain patients by a neurologist. A randomized clinical trial.

In a randomized, controlled design, the effect of psychiatric consultation intervention in medical outpatients with low-back pain (N = 104) was assessed for the patients' subjective well-being and satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs) in their cooperation with the neurologists. The goal of the intervention was an integrated approach towards the patients' symptoms and the improvement of the cooperation between primary and secondary medical health services. The intervention was designed at the health care provider level; the psychiatrist did not see or examine the patient. The 104 patients were subdivided into an intervention group (N = 50) and a control group (N = 54). The major outcome measures were the psychological status of the patient and degree of the GPs' satisfaction concerning the cooperation with the medical specialists. After 6 months follow-up, there was a greater overall decline of symptoms in the patient intervention group compared with the control group. However, it was not possible to specify this effect. Contrary to the hypotheses, GPs in the control group were as satisfied about the cooperation with the neurologist as their colleagues in the intervention group. Yet, the information in the specialists' letters of the intervention group was more often in agreement with the integrated model carried out. It is concluded that great diversity of the target group of patients and the focus on the neurologists' behavior may explain the lack of hypothesized effects. It is recommended that the target group be more specifically defined, and that a more intensive intervention might prove to be more effective.

Psychiatric consultations in medical outpatients with abdominal pain: patient and physician effects.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of a psychiatric consultation intervention in terms of changes in 1) the patients' psychological symptoms, and 2) satisfaction of general practitioners (GPs) concerning their cooperation with the internists. METHOD: In a randomized controlled design, the effect of a psychiatric consultation intervention in medical outpatients with abdominal pain (n = 106) has been assessed. The goal of the intervention was 1) a holistic approach toward the patients' symptoms, and 2) the improvement of the cooperation between primary and secondary medical health services. The intervention was designed at the health care provider level; the psychiatrist did not see or examine the patient. The 106 patients were subdivided in an index group (N = 49) and a control group (N = 57). The major outcome measures were the psychological status of the patient and degree of satisfaction of the GPs about the cooperation with the medical specialists. RESULTS: At six months follow-up, there was a significantly greater decline in depressive symptoms assessed by SCL-90 in the patient index group compared with the control group. The GPs of the index group were significantly more satisfied with the cooperation and communication with the internists compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: An experimental psychiatric consultation intervention did effect the patients' well-being to a certain degree, and especially the GPs were affected in terms of satisfaction. The relevance of improving the communication between health care providers in the management of somatizing patients is discussed.