The effect of a multidisciplinary outpatient team approach on outcomes in diabetic foot care: a single center study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed no reduction in major amputation rates after introduction of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. The efficacy of MDTs in the current standard of care is being questioned. This retrospective single-center study evaluated the efficacy of an outpatient MDT approach on limb salvage and ulcer healing in treating diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS: Patients with a diabetic foot ulcer treated before (2015) and after (2017) implementation of an MDT in a single center were compared. The MDT met weekly and consisted of a vascular surgeon, physiatrist, internist, shoe technician, wound care nurse, nurse practitioner, cast technician, and podiatrist. The primary outcome was limb salvage at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were ulcer healing, amputation-free survival, freedom from any amputation, and overall survival. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess predictors for major amputation. RESULTS: A vascular surgeon treated 104 patients with 148 ulcers in 2015, and the multidisciplinary team treated 133 patients with 188 ulcers in 2017. Limb salvage (90.9% vs. 95.5%, P=0.050), freedom from any amputation (56.5% vs. 78.0%, P<0.001), and ulcer healing (48.3% vs. 69.2%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the non-MDT group than in the MDT group. Amputation-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups. Predictors for major amputation were University of Texas Wound Classification 3D (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-6.45) and being treated in the non-MDT group (hazard ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-11.08). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study found an MDT dedicated to diabetic foot care was highly effective in increasing limb salvage and ulcer healing. We advise that such an MDT is an integrated part of the patient's chain-based care.

Ceftibuten plus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for oral treatment of urinary tract infections with ESBL producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae: a retrospective observational case-series.

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and bacteriological effect of oral treatment with ceftibuten plus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in patients with a urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing micro-organism. In this retrospective observational case-series, oral treatment with ceftibuten 400 mg QD plus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 625 mg TID for 14 days was evaluated in ten patients with pyelonephritis caused by an ESBL-positive micro-organism resistant to ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole. Presence of ESBL genes was confirmed using PCR and micro-array. EUCAST breakpoints were used for susceptibility testing. Ten patients (five women) were evaluated in 2016 and 2017. Six patients were from outpatient hospital care, and four from primary care. Urinary cultures yielded seven E. coli and three K. pneumoniae ESBL-positive isolates. Using Vitek-2, all isolates were resistant to cefotaxime, and resistant (n = 7) or intermediately susceptible (n = 3) to ceftazidime. With disc diffusion, all isolates were susceptible to ceftibuten (zones 25-32 mm), while with MIC test strips eight of ten isolates were resistant to ceftibuten (MICs 0.5-4 mg/L). An amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disc next to the ceftibuten disc extended the ceftibuten zone by 2-8 mm. All patients experienced clinical cure. Bacteriological cure (absence of pretreatment micro-organism in the first follow-up culture obtained within 3 months after treatment) was observed in all eight patients with follow-up cultures. This case-series shows that the synergistic combination of ceftibuten plus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid may be an option for oral treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL producing E. coli or K. pneumoniae.