Jet or conventional local anaesthesia? A randomized controlled split mouth study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, acceptance and preference of conventional infiltration technique with a needleless jet anaesthetic device (Comfort-In). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-fearful healthy adult volunteers, aged 19-40 years, were recruited in the Dental School of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Intact maxillary premolars were selected for local anaesthesia. Both techniques were applied sequentially with 35 min time gap on either buccal side on the same day by the same operator. The quadrant and the order of administration were randomly assigned using an online randomization generator. Immediately after administration, at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min, pulp vitality and soft tissue pain reaction tests were performed. Each participant was asked 6 questions in order to assess acceptance. At the end of the session, at 24 h and 7 days, all participants were asked to report any adverse events and their preference. RESULTS: In 63 volunteers who were successfully followed, 63 teeth received conventional local infiltration and 63 the Comfort-In. Both techniques presented with similar anaesthetic efficacy at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 min, whereas the conventional technique was more efficacious at 20 min (p < 0.005). Both presented similar acceptance apart from higher pain/discomfort during administration of Comfort-In (p = 0.002). Significantly higher preference was reported for the conventional technique immediately after the session, at 24 h and at 7 days (p < 0.0005); 19 (30.2%) reported the presence of ecchymosis or lacerations at the Comfort-In site as opposed to 5 (7.9%) with the conventional method (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Both techniques showed similar effectiveness. Conventional infiltration was preferred to needleless anaesthesia by non-fearful adult volunteers and was associated with less adverse events. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study enhances the advantages of conventional local anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17400733.

Relationship between Child and Parental Dental Anxiety with Child's Psychological Functioning and Behavior during the Administration of Local Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine: 1) the relationship between children's psychological functioning, dental anxiety and cooperative behavior before and during local anesthesia, 2) the relationship of parental dental anxiety with all the above child characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: There was a convenient sample of 100 children (4-12 years). Child dental anxiety and psychological functioning were measured using the "Children's Fear Survey Schedule" (CFSS-DS) and the "Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire" (SDQ) respectively. Parental dental anxiety was measured using the "Modified Dental Anxiety Scale" (MDAS). All questionnaires were completed by parents. Before and during local anesthesia, the child behavior was scored by one experienced examiner, using the Venham scale. Non-parametric tests and correlations (Mann-Whitney, Spearman's rho) were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The mean SDQ score was 10±5.6 for boys (n=60) and 8.3±4.8 for girls (n=40) (p=0.038), but there was no correlation with children's age. The mean CFSS-DS score was 33.1±11.86 and there was no correlation with age or gender. Children with higher levels in the pro-social subscale of the SDQ had significantly less anxiety and better behavior before local anesthesia. Higher mean CFSS-DS scores were significantly associated with uncooperative behavior during local anesthesia (p=0.04). There was no correlation between parents' and their children's dental anxiety, psychological functioning and behavior. 46% of the children had previous dental experience in the last 6 months. As time since the last dental treatment increased, an improvement was found in children's behavior during local anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Child psychological functioning was related to dental anxiety and behavior during dental appointment involving local anesthesia.

Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection INJEX and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11 year old dental patients.

Needleless devices have been developed to provide anesthesia without injections. Little controlled research has examined the acceptability of needleless devices in pediatric patients. The aims of the study were to compare children's acceptance and preference for one type of needleless jet injection with classical local infiltration as well as to evaluate the efficacy of the needleless anesthesia. Eighty-seven nonfearful children with no previous experience of dental anesthesia were studied using a split-mouth design. The first dental procedure was performed with the classical infiltration anesthesia. The same amount of anesthetic was administered using the INJEX needleless device in a second session 1 week later, during which a second dental procedure was performed. Patients rated their acceptance and preference for the 2 methods, and the dentist recorded data about the need for additional anesthesia. More negative experiences were reported for the INJEX method. Most (73.6%) of the children preferred the traditional method. Among the 87 treatment procedures attempted following the use of INJEX, 80.5% required additional anesthesia, compared with 2.3% of those attempted following traditional infiltration. Traditional infiltration was more effective, acceptable, and preferred, compared with the needleless INJEX.