Effect of a lead block on alveolar bone protection in image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for tongue cancer: using model-based dose calculation algorithms to correct for inhomogeneity.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a lead block for alveolar bone protection in image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for tongue cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We treated 6 patients and delivered 5,400 cGy in 9 fractions using a lead block. Effects of lead block (median thickness, 4 mm) on dose attenuation by distance were visually examined using TG-43 formalism-based dose distribution curves to determine whether or not the area with the highest dose is located in the alveolar bone, where there is a high-risk of infection. Dose re-calculations were performed using TG-186 formalism with advanced collapsed cone engine (ACE) for inhomogeneity correction set to cortical bone density for the whole mandible and alveolar bone, water density for clinical target volume (CTV), air density for outside body and lead density, and silastic density for lead block and its' silicon replica, respectively. RESULTS: The highest dose was detected outside the alveolar bone in five of the six cases. For dose-volume histogram analysis, median minimum doses delivered per fraction to the 0.1 cm3 of alveolar bone (D0.1cm3 TG-43, ACE-silicon, and ACE-lead) were 344.3 (range, 262.9-427.4) cGy, 336.6 (253.3-425.0) cGy, and 169.7 (114.9-233.3) cGy, respectively. D0.1cm3 ACE-lead was significantly lower than other parameters. No significant difference was observed between CTV-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that using a lead block for alveolar bone protection with a thickness of about 4 mm, can shift the highest dose area to non-alveolar regions. In addition, it reduced D0.1cm3 of alveolar bone to about half, without affecting tumor dose.

A new implant device to prevent edema-associated underdosage in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy of mobile tongue cancer.

PURPOSE: Tongue edema is a potential cause of treatment target underdosage in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) of mobile tongue cancer. To prevent such edema-associated alteration of dosimetry, we developed a special silicon device. In this report we communicate our initial experience with two mobile tongue cancer patients whom we treated using this new device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The device consists of silicone tubes with a fixed width and scalable length depending on tongue size. These tubes are lined and fixed like a palisade, allowing the device to be used also as a template. The device is placed next to the lateral border of the tongue and on the floor of the mouth. In addition, a vinyl template can be placed on the dorsal tongue surface with both devices combined for implantation guidance. Between June and August 2012, two patients with locally confined tongue cancer were treated. RESULTS: Between June and August 2012, two mobile tongue cancer patients classified as cT2N0M0 were treated with HDR-ISBT using the silicone device. They underwent ISBT as monotherapy with fractional doses of 6.0 Gy up to a total physical dose of 54.0 Gy. The D90 (CTV) values of both patients were 6.3 Gy and 6.6 Gy and the D2cc (mandible) values were 3.4 Gy and 2.6 Gy, respectively. At present, both patients remain without local disease recurrence at 60 and 56 months after ISBT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The described silicone device has the potential to prevent underdosage to the treatment target related to tongue edema. It has been shown to be safe and easy to implement.

Role of novel risk classification method, Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX) for clinically localized prostate cancer after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy.

AIM: To examine the role of the new grading system Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX) with existing risk-grouping after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed outcome in 100 patients treated by HDR-ISBT as monotherapy using PRIX and compared this with D'Amico, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and Seattle classifications. The median follow-up was 74 (range=48-109) months. RESULTS: Five-year prostate-specific antigen control and overall survival rates were 94% and 98%, respectively. PRIX separated the risks statistically significantly (p=0.004), while D'Amico (p=0.319), NCCN 2002 (p=0.126), NCCN 2012 (p=0.052) and Seattle (p=0.112) classifications failed to show a statistically significant separation. CONCLUSION: PRIX is a more useful risk classification system in high-risk patient selection than existing risk classification system in clinically localized prostate cancer after HDR-ISBT as monotherapy.

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for mobile tongue cancer: preliminary results of a dose reduction trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of our facility with another about the shortened schedule (60 Gy in 10 fractions to 54 Gy in 9 fractions) of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR ISBT) for mobile tongue cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen patients were treated with HDR ISBT as a monotherapy in dose reduction schedule with some unique technique to determine the border of tumor accuracy (lugol's staining and metal marker), and to minimize adverse effect (lead-lined silicon block) at our facility. RESULTS: The 2-year local and regional control rates and cause-specific survival rate were 82%, 80%, and 83% and moderate to severe late complications occurred in five patients (28%), which were almost the same treatment results achieved by another facility. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend 54 Gy in 9 fractions over 7 days as a feasible treatment to reduce patient discomfort in mobile tongue cancer patients.

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: are high-risk patients good candidates?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) as the only form of radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2003 and June 2008, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 48 high-risk patients who had undergone HDR-ISBT at the National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital. Risk group classification was according to the criteria described in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Median follow-up was 73 months (range 12-109 months). Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered to all 48 patients; 12 patients also received adjuvant ADT. Maximal androgen blockade was performed in 37 patients. Median total treatment duration was 8 months (range 3-45 months). The planned prescribed dose was 54 Gy in 9 fractions over 5 days for the first 13 patients and 49 Gy in 7 fractions over 4 days for 34 patients. Only one patient who was over 80 years old received 38 Gy in 4 fractions over 3 days. The clinical target volume (CTV) was calculated for the prostate gland and the medial side of the seminal vesicles. A 10-mm cranial margin was added to the CTV to create the planning target volume (PTV). RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and biochemical control rates were 98 and 87 %, respectively. Grade 3 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications occurred in 2 patients (4 %) and 1 patient (2 %), respectively; grade 2 late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications occurred in 5 patients (10 %) and 1 patient (2 %), respectively. CONCLUSION: Even for high-risk patients, HDR-ISBT as the only form of radiotherapy combined with ADT achieved promising biochemical control results, with acceptable late genitourinary and gastrointestinal complication rates.

Three-dimensional image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for mobile tongue cancer.

To investigate the influence of a 3D image-based treatment-planning method for high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for mobile tongue cancer, we analyzed dose-volume histogram results for the clinical target volume (CTV) and the mandible. Between October 2010 and November 2011, one and four patients having T2 and T3 tumors, respectively, were treated with HDR-ISBT. Multiplane implantation using 9-15 treatment applicators was performed. Lugol's iodine staining, metal markers, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging were used to identify the contours of the gross tumor volume (defined as the CTV). The results of the image-based treatment plan were compared with those of the conventional simulated plan on the basis of a reference point 5 mm from the applicator position. The mean D90(CTV) and V100(CTV) were 112% of the prescribed dose (PD) and 98.1%PD, respectively, for the image-based plan, and 113%PD and 97.2%PD, respectively, for the conventional plan. The median CTVref/Vref was 0.23 for the image-based plan and 0.16 for the conventional plan (P = 0.01). The mean D0.1 cm(3) (mandible), D1 cm(3) (mandible), and D2 cm(3) (mandible) were 80.1%PD, 62.5%PD, and 55.7%PD, respectively, for the image-based plan, and 109.1%PD (P = 0.02), 82.4%PD (P = 0.005), and 74%PD (P = 0.004), respectively, for the conventional plan). Image-based treatment planning may achieve high-conformity radiotherapy for the CTV and decrease irradiated doses to the mandible.

External-beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Osaka, Japan, 1995-2006: time trends, outcome, and risk stratification.

PURPOSE: To establish an initial database of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer used in Osaka, Japan, and, by analyzing the results of the Osaka multicenter cooperative study, to determine time trends, outcome, and applicability of existing and the authors' original risk stratification methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 652 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (T1-4 N0 M0) were accrued from July to December 2007. These patients had been treated from 1995 through 2006 with consecutive definitive EBRT of > or = 60 Gy at eleven institutions, mainly in Osaka. Altogether, 436 patients were eligible for analysis using several risk stratification methods, namely, those of D'Amico et al., the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and Seattle, as well as the authors' original Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX). RESULTS: The number of patients showed a tenfold increase over 10 years, together with a rapid spread of the use of Gleason Score from 0% to > 90% of cases. The dominant RT dose fractionation was 70 Gy/35 fractions (87%). Hormone therapy had been administered to 95% of the patients and the higher PRIX corresponded to the higher rate of hormone usage. 3- and 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates were 85% and 70%, respectively. The D'Amico (p = 0.132), NCCN (p = 0.138), Seattle (p = 0.041) and PRIX (p = 0.044) classifications showed weak or no correlation with bRFS, while the own modified three-class PRIX (PRIX 0, 1-5, 6) showed a strong correlation (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The use of prostate EBRT in Japan is still in its infancy, but is rapidly expanding. The short-term outcomes have been satisfactory considering the moderate RT dose. A very high rate of hormone usage may affect the outcome favorably, but also may compromise the usefulness of current risk stratification.