Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Can Target the Thalamic "Sweet Spot" for Improving Neuropathic Dental Pain.

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic dental pain (NDP) is a chronic pain condition that is notoriously difficult to treat. To date, there are no deep brain stimulation (DBS) studies on this specific pain condition and no optimal target or "sweet spot" has ever been defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal thalamic target for improving this condition by utilizing the steering abilities of a directional DBS electrode (Vercise CartesiaTM Model DB-2202-45, Boston Scientific). METHODS: A literature search and review of our database identified 3 potential thalamic targets. A directional lead was implanted in a patient with NDP and its current steering used to test the effects in each nucleus. The patient reported her pain after 2 wk of stimulation in a prospective randomized blinded trial of one. Quality of life measurements were performed before and after 3 mo on their best setting. RESULTS: We identified 3 potential nuclei: the centromedian (CM), ventral posterior medial (VPM), and anterior pulvinar. The best results were during VPM stimulation (>90% reduction in pain) and CM stimulation (50% reduction). Following 3 mo of VPM-DBS in combination of lateral CM stimulation, their pain disability index dropped (from 25 to 0) and short form 36 improved (from 67.5 to 90). CONCLUSION: VPM stimulation in combination with CM stimulation is a promising target for NDP. DBS electrode directionality can be used to test multiple targets and select a patient specific "sweet spot" for NDP treatment.

Tremor and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Essential Tremor Before and After Replacing Their Standard Deep Brain Stimulation With a Directional System.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with essential tremor treated with thalamic deep brain stimulation may experience increased tremor with the progression of their disease. Initially, this can be counteracted with increased stimulation. Eventually, this may cause unwanted side-effects as the circumferential stimulation from a standard ring contact spreads into adjacent regions. Directional leads may offer a solution to this clinical problem. We aimed to compare the ability of a standard and a directional system to reduce tremor without side-effects and to improve the quality of life for patients with advanced essential tremor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six advanced essential tremor patients with bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation had their standard system replaced with a directional system. Tremor rating scale scores were prospectively evaluated before and after the replacement surgery. Secondary analyses of quality of life related to tremor, voice, and general health were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significantly greater reduction in tremor without side-effects (p = 0.017) when using the directional system. There were improvements in tremor (p = 0.031) and voice (p = 0.037) related quality of life but not in general health for patients using optimized stimulation settings with the directional system compared to the standard system. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of advanced essential tremor patients who no longer had ideal tremor reduction with a standard system, replacing their deep brain stimulation with a directional system significantly improved their tremor and quality of life. Up-front implantation of directional deep brain stimulation leads may provide better tremor control in those patients who progress at a later time point.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Spasmodic Dysphonia: A Blinded Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Stimulation in Two Patients.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising new therapy for patients with spasmodic dysphonia (SD). The preliminary results from our randomized controlled trial showed good clinical effects with unilateral left thalamic stimulation in 6 right- handed patients. This suggests that the pathological process underpinning SD may have a "hemisphere dominant" pathway. We describe 2 patients with concurrent essential tremor and SD who had previously undergone bilateral thalamic DBS for their limb tremor. Both patients experienced an unanticipated improvement of their SD symptoms. One patient was right-handed, and the other was mixed left-handed. To investigate the amount of SD improvement following DBS therapy in each hemisphere, 4 different settings were tested: both sides on, left side on, right side on, and both sides off. Both patients most improved following bilateral stimulation. There was, however, a powerful unilateral benefit in both patients with only a small additional benefit from bilateral stimulation. The right-handed patient improved most with left-hemisphere stimulation whereas the mixed left-handed patient improved most with right hemisphere stimulation. There was some discrepancy between the two tests applied in the second patient reflecting the known difficulties to evaluate vocal symptom improvement in SD. We discuss the possible correlation of handedness and speech hemisphere dominance as well as the need for more reliable tests to measure SD severity. Ultimately, we recommend a bilateral approach for future studies, using a patient perception test as the primary outcome and functional imaging to further investigate the correlation of handedness and the amount of hemisphere dominance in SD.