Anorectal angle at rest predicting successful sacral nerve stimulation in idiopathic fecal incontinence-a cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: Sacral nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for patients suffering from fecal incontinence. However, less is known about predictors of success before stimulation. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of successful sacral nerve stimulation in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. METHODS: Consecutive female patients, receiving peripheral nerve evaluation and sacral nerve stimulation between September 2008 and October 2014, suffering from idiopathic fecal incontinence were included in this study. Preoperative patient's characteristics, anal manometry, and defecography results were collected prospectively and investigated by retrospective analysis. Main outcome measures were independent predictors of treatment success after sacral nerve stimulation. RESULTS: From, all in all, 54 patients suffering from idiopathic fecal incontinence receiving peripheral nerve evaluation, favorable outcome was achieved in 23 of 30 patients after sacral nerve stimulation (per protocol 76.7%; intention to treat 42.6%). From all analyzed characteristics, wide anorectal angle at rest in preoperative defecography was the only independent predictor of favorable outcome in multivariate analysis (favorable 134.1 ± 13.9° versus unfavorable 118.6 ± 17.1°). CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal angle at rest in preoperative defecography might present a predictor of outcome after sacral nerve stimulation in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence.

Sphincter-sparing intersphincteric rectal resection as an alternative to proctectomy in long-standing fistulizing and stenotic Crohn's proctitis?

PURPOSE: Long-standing fistulizing and stenotic proctitis (LFSP) in Crohn's disease (CD) indicates the end stage of the disease. Definitive diversion such as proctectomy is considered to be the only surgical option. The impact of intersphincteric sphincter-sparing anterior rectal resection (IAR) as an alternative to proctectomy is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility, morbidity, outcome, and quality of life (QL) in patients with LFSP undergoing intended IAR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out of a single institution database, 15 patients with LFSP intended for surgery from 856 patients with CD were selected for follow-up analyses. RESULTS: In 12/15 cases, IAR was carried out while 3/15 patients underwent primary proctectomy due to malignancy (n = 2) or due to patient's wish (n = 1). In one case, IAR revealed unexpected malignancy, which led to secondary proctectomy. In patients with IAR, complete healing of fistulas and stenosis was observed in 46% (n = 5) while 36% (n = 4) of patients showed relapse of fistula and 18% (n = 2) developed restenosis. Ileostomy closure was performed in seven patients from which six patients remained stoma free. QL and fecal incontinence measured by standardized scoring systems were unchanged while stool frequency was reduced after IAR in patients with ileostomy closure. The rate of malignancy in this cohort was 20% (n = 3). CONCLUSION: LFSP in CD was associated with 20% of malignant transformation. Although IAR fails to improve QL, it is a suitable procedure for the treatment of fistulas and stenosis associated with acceptable healing rates and can avoid a permanent stoma.

Neurostimulated levator augmentation--a new approach in restoring continence.

PURPOSE: Restoration of continence remains a major challenge in patients after abdominoperineal rectal excision (APE) or with end-stage fecal incontinence. A new surgical technique, the neurostimulated levator augmentation, was introduced for pelvic floor augmentation using dynamic graciloplasty in order to restore anorectal angulation. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and efficiency. METHODS: From November 2009 to March 2014, n = 17 patients underwent neurostimulated levator augmentation (n = 10 after APE, n = 5 intractable idiopathic fecal incontinence, n = 2 traumatic anal amputation). Gracilis muscle was transposed through the obturator foramen into the pelvic cavity, positioned in a U-shaped sling behind the rectum, fixed to the contralateral os pubis to restore anorectal angulation, and then conditioned by neurostimulation. Questionnaires analyzing function and quality of life were administered. RESULTS: For neurostimulated levator augmentation, four patients suffered from complications that needed operative intervention (n = 3 wound infection, n = 1 colon perforation); three pharmacological treatment and two complications needed no further invasive intervention. One patient died due to causes unrelated to the operation, and no complication required intensive care management. Fecal incontinence in patients with idiopathic incontinence improved significantly after surgery as well as incontinence episodes, urgency, and disease-specific quality of life through all dimensions. Generic quality of life was significantly better after surgery in all patients. After median follow-up of 17 months (2-45), all but one patient would undergo the procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: Neurostimulated levator augmentation was feasible in all patients with acceptable morbidity. It may represent a new therapeutic option in selected patients with intractable fecal incontinence.