Therapy Habituation at 12 Months: Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I and II.

The ACCURATE randomized, controlled trial compared outcomes of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation versus tonic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in 152 subjects with chronic lower extremity pain due to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I or II. This ACCURATE substudy was designed to evaluate whether therapy habituation occurs with DRG stimulation as compared to SCS through 12-months. A modified intention-to-treat analysis was performed to assess percentage pain relief (PPR) and responder rates at follow-up visits (end-of-trial, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12-months postpermanent implant) for all subjects that completed trial stimulation (DRG:N = 73, SCS:N = 72). For both groups, mean PPR was significantly greater at end-of-trial (DRG = 82.2%, SCS =0 77.0%) than all other follow-ups. Following permanent DRG system implantation, none of the time points were significantly different from one another in PPR (range = 69.3-73.9%). For the SCS group, PPR at 9-months (58.3%) and 12-months (57.9%) was significantly less than at 1-month (66.9%). The responder rate also decreased for the SCS group from 1-month (68.1%) to 12-months (61.1%). After stratifying by diagnosis, it was found that only the CRPS-I population had diminishing pain relief with SCS. DRG stimulation resulted in more stable pain relief through 12-months, while tonic SCS demonstrated therapy habituation at 9- and 12-months. Trial Registration: The ACCURATE study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with Identifier NCT01923285. PERSPECTIVE: This article reports on an ACCURATE substudy, which found that long-term therapy habituation occurred at 12-months with SCS, but not DRG stimulation, in patients with CRPS. The underlying mechanisms of action for these results remain unclear, although several lines of inquiry are proposed.

In vivo toxicology of excipients commonly employed in drug discovery in rats.

INTRODUCTION: Toxicology and pharmacology studies conducted in the early stages of drug discovery often require formulation strategies involving the use of excipients with limited knowledge regarding their preclinical safety liabilities. The use of excipients is vital to efforts to solubilize and deliver small molecules in drug discovery. Whilst excipients can have a significant impact on pharmacology and toxicology studies by enabling solubility to maximize systemic exposure, they also have the potential to obscure clinical pathology endpoints. In this article, we report on the in vivo safety in rats for 18 excipients commonly employed in formulations for preclinical pharmacology and toxicology studies. METHODS: The test articles were administered once daily for five days, by oral gavage to male Sprague Dawley rats, and the animals monitored for visible clinical signs. At the end of the study, routine necropsy and clinical pathology endpoints were investigated. RESULTS: None of the excipients tested were acutely toxic. However, there were effects on parameters commonly evaluated as indicators of health and/or toxicological response in regulated preclinical safety studies. DISCUSSION: While the excipients tested were generally well tolerated, several were found to affect common clinical pathology endpoints in a manner that might confound or conceivably mask the interpretation of compound mediated adverse/pharmacological effects.

The application of discovery toxicology and pathology towards the design of safer pharmaceutical lead candidates.

Toxicity is a leading cause of attrition at all stages of the drug development process. The majority of safety-related attrition occurs preclinically, suggesting that approaches to identify 'predictable' preclinical safety liabilities earlier in the drug development process could lead to the design and/or selection of better drug candidates that have increased probabilities of becoming marketed drugs. In this Review, we discuss how the early application of preclinical safety assessment--both new molecular technologies as well as more established approaches such as standard repeat-dose rodent toxicology studies--can identify predictable safety issues earlier in the testing paradigm. The earlier identification of dose-limiting toxicities will provide chemists and toxicologists the opportunity to characterize the dose-limiting toxicities, determine structure-toxicity relationships and minimize or circumvent adverse safety liabilities.