Fever-range whole body hyperthermia increases the number of perfused tumor blood vessels and therapeutic efficacy of liposomally encapsulated doxorubicin.

PURPOSE: Two major questions were addressed: (1) Can fever-range whole body hyperthermia (FR-WBH) affect the number of perfused tumor blood vessels? (2) Can pre-treatment with FR-WBH improve accumulation or anti-tumor efficacy of doxorubicin or DOXIL (liposomal doxorubicin)? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perfused blood vessels were visualized by intravenous injection of the fluorescent dye (DiOC7(3)) and the number of labeled vessels in tumors and normal organs of unheated mice and those previously heated to 39.5 degrees C for 6 hours were compared. Using three animal tumor models (one syngeneic murine model and two human tumor xenografts in SCID mice) we also compared tumor growth and amount of intratumoral doxorubicin (given as free drug or as DOXIL) in control mice or those given pre-treatment with FR-WBH. RESULTS: FR-WBH had no effect on the number of CD-31 labeled blood vessels. However, in tumors, but not in normal organs of the same animals, FR-WBH resulted in a significant increase in those blood vessels which could take up dye over a prolonged period of time after heating. There was also an increase in DOXIL uptake in the tumors of mice given FR-WBH prior to drug injection as well as enhanced therapeutic efficacy in all three tumor models. CONCLUSIONS: FR-WBH increases the number of perfused blood vessels in tumors over a prolonged period following FR-WBH and thus may be useful for improving tumor targeting of cancer therapeutics. We discuss these data in relation to long-conserved thermoregulatory features in normal vasculature, which may be deficient in tumor vasculature.

Randomized multicenter trial of hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with melphalan alone compared with melphalan plus tumor necrosis factor: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0020.

PURPOSE: To determine in a randomized prospective multi-institutional trial whether the addition of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) to a melphalan-based hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) treatment would improve the complete response rate for locally advanced extremity melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced extremity melanoma were randomly assigned to receive melphalan or melphalan plus TNF-alpha during standard HILP. Patient randomization was stratified according to disease/treatment status and regional nodal disease status. RESULTS: The intervention was completed in 124 patients of the 133 enrolled. Grade 4 adverse events were observed in 14 (12%) of 129 patients, with three (4%) of 64 in the melphalan-alone arm and 11 (16%) of 65 in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm (P = .0436). There were two toxicity-related lower extremity amputations in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm, and one disease progression-related upper extremity amputation in the melphalan-alone arm. There was no treatment-related mortality in either arm of the study. One hundred sixteen patients were assessable at 3 months postoperatively. Sixty-four percent of patients (36 of 58) in the melphalan-alone arm and 69% of patients (40 of 58) in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm showed a response to treatment at 3 months, with a complete response rate of 25% (14 of 58 patients) in the melphalan-alone arm and 26% (15 of 58 patients) in the melphalan-plus-TNF-alpha arm (P = .435 and P = .890, respectively). CONCLUSION: In locally advanced extremity melanoma treated with HILP, the addition of TNF-alpha to melphalan did not demonstrate a significant enhancement of short-term response rates over melphalan alone by the 3-month follow-up, and TNF-alpha plus melphalan was associated with a higher complication rate.

Costs of follow-up after potentially curative treatment for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma.

Soft-tissue sarcoma is an uncommon cancer with the potential for high rates of recurrence after initial therapy. Multiple surveillance strategies have been developed to follow patients after primary treatment. The purpose of this study was to quantify the costs associated with various published post-treatment surveillance strategies. A literature review covering the years 1982-2003 was performed to find all modern published surveillance methods for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Only articles describing an explicit 5-year follow-up strategy were included. Total costs of 5-year follow-up were calculated for each strategy using Medicare-allowed charges as a proxy. Thirty-four articles depicting 54 strategies were identified. Total Medicare-allowed charges in year 2003 dollars ranged from 485 dollars for follow-up of low-grade sarcoma to 21,235 dollars for follow-up of high-grade sarcoma, a 42.8-fold cost differential. The average charge for these 54 strategies was 6,401 dollars. Physical examination and chest x-ray were the most commonly used screening modalities. Several guidelines have been proposed for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma patient follow-up, most prominently those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The literature has yet to reflect the consensus these guidelines suggest. This study shows wide disparity in the costs of 54 specific methods of following soft-tissue sarcoma patients. Clinical trials are needed to identify an optimal surveillance strategy, one balancing gains in survival, quality of life, costs, and societal willingness to expend resources. Such trials have not been conducted due to the rarity of extremity soft-tissue sarcomas and the costs associated with conducting long-term trials. Alternatively, prospective evaluation of imaging modalities used in follow-up should be assessed as part of other trials. Computer simulation analysis also holds great promise as an assessment tool for surveillance strategies because patient participation is not required.