No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Immigration has taken the central stage in world politics, especially in the developed countries like Germany, where the continuous flow of immigrants has been well documented since 1960s. Strikingly, emerging data suggest that migrant patients have a poorer response to the treatment and lower survival rates in their new host country, raising concerns about health disparities. Herein, we present our investigation on the treatment response rate and cancer survival in German patients with and without an immigrant background that were treated at our comprehensive cancer center in Germany. METHODS: Initially, we considered 8162 cancer patients treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Germany (April 2002-December 2015) for matched-pair analysis. Subsequently, the German patients with a migration background and those from the native German population were manually identified and catalogued using a highly specific name-based algorithm. The clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, defined staging criteria, and primary therapy were further adjusted. Using these stringent criteria, a total of 422 patients (n = 211, Germans with migration background; n = 211, native German population) were screened to compare for the treatment response and survival rates (i.e., 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to progression). RESULTS: Compared to the cohort with migration background, the cohort without migration background was slightly older (54.9 vs. 57.9 years) while having the same sex distribution (54.5% vs. 55.0% female) and longer follow-up time (36.9 vs. 42.6 months). We did not find significant differences in cancer survival (5-year overall survival, P = 0.771) and the response rates (Overall Remission Rate; McNemar's test, P = 0.346) between both collectives. CONCLUSION: Contrary to prior reports, we found no significant differences in cancer survival between German patients with immigrant background and native German patients. Nevertheless, the advanced treatment protocols implemented at our comprehensive cancer center may possibly account for the low variance in outcome. To conduct similar studies with a broader perspective, we propose that certain risk factors (country-of-origin-specific infections, dietary habits, epigenetics for chronic diseases etc.) should be considered, specially in the future studies that will recruit new arrivals from the 2015 German refugee crisis.

A matched-pair analysis on survival and response rates between German and non-German cancer patients treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Research shows disparities in cancer outcomes by ethnicity or socio-economic status. Therefore, it is the aim of our study to perform a matched-pair analysis which compares the outcome of German and non-German (in the following described as 'foreign') cancer patients being treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn at the University Hospital of Bonn between January 2010 and June 2016. METHODS: During this time, 6314 well-documented patients received a diagnosis of cancer. Out of these patients, 219 patients with foreign nationality could be matched to German patients based on diagnostic and demographic criteria and were included in the study. All of these 438 patients were well characterized concerning survival data (Overall survival, Progression-free survival and Time to progression) and response to treatment. RESULTS: No significant differences regarding the patients' survival and response rates were seen when all German and foreign patients were compared. A subgroup analysis of German and foreign patients with head and neck cancer revealed a significantly longer progression-free survival for the German patients. Differences in response to treatment could not be found in this subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, no major differences in survival and response rates of German and foreign cancer patients were revealed in this study. Nevertheless, the differences in progression-free survival, which could be found in the subgroup analysis of patients with head and neck cancer, should lead to further research, especially evaluating the role of infectious diseases like human papillomavirus (HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) on carcinogenesis and disease progression.

YRNA expression in prostate cancer patients: diagnostic and prognostic implications.

OBJECTIVE: To study the expression of YRNAs (Ro-associated Y), a novel class of non-coding RNAs, in prostate cancer (PCA) patients. METHODS: The expression of all four YRNAs (RNY1, RNY3, RNY4, RNY5) was determined in archival PCA (prostate adenocarcinoma, n = 56), normal (n = 36) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; n = 28) tissues using quantitative real-time PCR. Associations with clinicopathological parameters and prognostic role for biochemical recurrence-free survival were analysed. RESULTS: All YRNAs were significantly downregulated in PCA tissue compared to normal tissue (all YRNAs) and to BPH tissue (RNY4 and RNY5; RNY1 and RNY3 as trend). Among tumor ISUP grade groups, the most prominent differences in the expression were evident between groups 1 and 2 (RNY1, RNY3 und RNY4; all p < 0.05). Discrimination ability for normal/BPH tissue versus tumor tissue in ROC analysis (area under curve) was ranging from 0.658 (RNY1) to 0.739 (RNY4). Higher RNY5 expression was associated with poor prognosis (biochemical recurrence-free survival). CONCLUSION: The expression of YRNAs is altered in PCA and associated with poor prognosis (RNY5). Possible diagnostic role of YRNAs in prostate cancer should be investigated in further studies.

CXCL12 expression and PD-L1 expression serve as prognostic biomarkers in HCC and are induced by hypoxia.

Anti-PD-1 treatment increases anti-tumour immune responses in animal models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib, the mainstay of treatment of HCC patients, however, leads to tumour hypoxia and thereby abrogates the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. This served as a rationale to implement CXCR4 inhibition as adjunct to sorafenib and anti-PD-1 treatment in murine HCC models. We studied the relationship between tumour hypoxia, PD-L1 and CXCL12 expression in human HCC, aiming to test the rationale for triple therapy combining sorafenib, PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors and CXCR4 inhibitors. Expression of CXCL12, PD-L1 and of surrogate markers for tumour hypoxia was evaluated at messenger RNA (mRNA) level in a cohort of HCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas and immunohistochemically in an independent cohort from the University Hospital of Bonn. Retrospective survival analyses were conducted. CXCL12 mRNA level significantly correlated with markers indicating tumour hypoxia in HCC (HIF1-α ρ = 0.104, p = 0.047). PD-L1 expression was significantly increased in tumours with a high number of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (ρ = 0.533, p < 0.001). In Cox proportional hazard analyses, high PD-L1 expression and loss of nuclear CXCL12 expression showed significant prognostic value in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.35 [95%CI 1.33-8.46], p = 0.011 for PD-L1; HR = 2.64 [95%CI 1.18-5.88], p = 0.018 for CXCL12, respectively). This study supports the rationale to combine CXCR4 inhibitors and PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with HCC, as sorafenib-induced tumour hypoxia leads to upregulation of PD-L1 and CXCL12.

Fish oil, but not soy bean or olive oil enriched infusion decreases histopathological severity of acute pancreatitis in rats without affecting eicosanoid synthesis.

Different dietary fatty acids affect eicosanoid metabolism in different ways, thus influencing the pro- and anti-inflammatory balance of prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Therefore, we analyzed the impact of [n-3], [n-6], and [n-9] fatty acids on eicosanoid metabolism and histopathology in acute pancreatitis in rats. Seventy-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into five groups (n = 15). Group 1 underwent only laparotomy, while in groups, 2-5 pancreatitis was induced. Groups 1 and 2 were then given saline infusion, groups 3-5 received fat emulsion (group 3: rich in [n-6], group 4: rich in [n-9], group 5: rich in [n-3] fatty acids) for another 18 h. Infusion rich in [n-3] fatty acids significantly decreased histopathological severity of pancreatitis, compared to all other groups. There was no difference concerning the concentrations of prostaglandins and leukotrienes between all groups. Parenteral infusion rich in [n-3] fatty acids reduced histopathological severity of acute pancreatitis in rats without changing eicosanoid metabolism at the endpoint.