Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Menopause ; 16(5): 932-6, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19421075

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In randomized trials, the most common way to measure the effect of treatment on the frequency and severity of menopausal hot flashes is a 7-day self-reported diary. However, adherence with completing the hot flash diary in real time may be poor, and completing a diary is cumbersome for study participants. Our objective was to determine if a shorter diary for recording self-reported hot flashes is as accurate and precise as the traditional 7-day diary. METHODS: Using cross-sectional data from a multicenter randomized clinical trial of an herbal preparation (MF101, an estrogen receptor beta-selective agonist for treatment of menopausal hot flashes), we compared findings based on shorter diaries with findings based on a 7-day diary. RESULTS: With 3 days of diary keeping, the mean number of hot flashes per day and mean severity were almost identical to the means based on the 7-day diary, the SDs of the means were almost identical, and the intraclass correlations were almost perfect. The difference in the mean number of hot flashes per day compared with the 7-day diary was only 12% of one hot flash. Data from a different clinical trial revealed similar correspondence between the findings of a 3- and 7-day diary. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the optimal duration of diary keeping to record menopausal hot flashes seems to be 3 days. In addition to being as good as a 7-day diary, a 3-day diary would be less burden on study participants and research staff and less expensive.


Assuntos
Fogachos/psicologia , Prontuários Médicos/normas , Menopausa/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados/economia , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/normas , Feminino , Fogachos/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Menopausa/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fitoterapia , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Menopause ; 16(3): 458-65, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19182698

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal dose, safety, and efficacy of an estrogen receptor beta selective Chinese herbal extract, menopausal formula 101 (MF101), for treating hot flushes. METHODS: A randomized, blinded trial in 217 postmenopausal women with hot flushes randomized to 5 or 10 g/day of MF101 or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: The effects of 5 g/day of MF101 did not differ from those of placebo. After 12 weeks, the mean percent decrease in frequency of hot flushes in the 10 g/day group was 12.9% greater than that in the placebo group (P = 0.15), the median percent decrease was 11.7% greater than that in the placebo group (P = 0.05), and the proportion of women with at least a 50% reduction in hot flushes was 16.2% greater than that in the placebo group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 10 g/day of MF101 reduces the frequency of hot flushes. Trials with higher doses are planned.


Assuntos
Fogachos/tratamento farmacológico , Extratos Vegetais/administração & dosagem , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Endométrio/efeitos dos fármacos , Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Menopausa , Metrorragia/induzido quimicamente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA