Consensus views on competencies and teaching methods for an interprofessional curriculum on complementary and integrative medicine: A Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: A collaborative team is necessary to help patients achieve their healthcare goals using complementary medicine. At present, healthcare professionals do not feel sufficiently qualified to provide this service. This study sought to identify competencies and teaching methods for interprofessional training on complementary and integrative medicine at medical schools. METHODS: Sixty-five German-speaking experts with various professional backgrounds were invited to take part in a three-round Delphi study. In the first round, predefined competencies were assessed on a seven-point Likert scale, and participants were invited to propose additional competencies that would be evaluated in the subsequent rounds. The competencies were ranked based on the participant assessments and were assigned to four relevance groups. In the second and third rounds, suitable teaching methods were identified using free-text fields and multiple-choice questions. In a final workshop, participants synthesized the outcomes of the previous sessions and derived key competencies that would be a benefit to undergraduate interprofessional training in complementary and integrative medicine at medical schools. RESULTS: The three rounds plus final worksop were attended by 50, 40, 36 and 11 experts. The competencies that these experts determined to be highly relevant to teaching complementary and integrative medicine emphasized, in particular, the respectful treatment of patients and the importance of taking a medical history. From these highly relevant competencies, three key targets were agreed upon in the final workshop: students are able to 1) classify and assess complementary medical terms and methods; 2) work collaboratively and integrate patients into the interprofessional team; 3) involve patients and their relatives respectfully and empathetically in all healthcare processes. To achieve these competency goals, the following teaching methods were highlighted: students discuss therapy options based on authentic patient cases with each other and practice empathic patient communication incorporating complementary medicine. Further, the theoretical background of complementary medicines could be provided as online-training, to use the class sessions for hands-on exercises and interprofessional exchange and discussion. CONCLUSION: Despite the heterogeneous panel of experts, a consensus was reached on the competency orientation and teaching approaches. The results can promote the implementation of interprofessional training for complementary medicine in undergraduate education.

Komplementäre und Integrative Medizin in der Facharztweiterbildung Allgemeinmedizin: Ergebnisse einer Bedarfserhebung bei Ärzten in Weiterbildung.

Hintergrund: Inhalte aus den Bereichen der klassischen Naturheilverfahren und Komplementärmedizin sind im Rahmen der ärztlichen Approbationsordnung curricular verankert. Im Gegensatz dazu werden in den Weiterbildungsordnungen zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin keine komplementärmedizinischen Inhalte abgebildet. Bisher ist nicht bekannt, ob Ärzte in Weiterbildung (ÄiW) zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin innerhalb ihrer Weiterbildung mit komplementärmedizinischen Verfahren in Kontakt kommen und ob sie solche erlernen bzw. erlernen möchten. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war die Erhebung der Einstellung zum und des Weiterbildungsbedarfs im Bereich Komplementärmedizin bei ÄiW zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin. Methoden: In Rahmen einer Querschnittsstudie erfolgte eine Fragebogen-gestützte Umfrage unter ÄiW zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin innerhalb des Weiterbildungsprogramms «Verbundweiterbildungplus Baden-Württemberg¼. Diese wurde onlinebasiert initiiert und durch eine papierbasierte Umfrage komplettiert. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt nahmen 138 Teilnehmer der Verbundweiterbildungplus Baden-Württemberg an der Umfrage teil. Der Gesamtrücklauf betrug damit 28%. Dabei zeigte sich, dass die Teilnehmenden ein hohes Interesse an Komplementärmedizin hatten. Gleichzeitig gaben sie an, Unsicherheiten sowohl inhaltlicher als auch formaler Art wahrzunehmen (z.B. Evidenz der einzelnen Methoden und Kostenübernahme durch gesetzliche Krankenkassen). Die große Mehrheit der befragten Ärzte befürwortete, dass in der Weiterbildung zum Facharzt Allgemeinmedizin Kompetenzen aus dem Bereich Komplementärmedizin vermittelt werden. Schlussfolgerungen: Vor dem Hintergrund der weiten Verbreitung komplementärmedizinischer Methoden im hausärztlichen Alltag muss diskutiert werden, ob im Rahmen der Weiterbildung zum Facharzt für Allgemeinmedizin Basiskompetenzen für diesen Bereich definiert werden sollten. Diese könnten beispielsweise in das «Kompetenzbasierte Curriculum Allgemeinmedizin¼ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin (DEGAM) einfließen.

Novel oral anticoagulants in primary care in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional comparison before and after their introduction.

BACKGROUND: Novel oral anticoagulation (NOAC) has been introduced in recent years, but data on use in atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care setting is scarce. In Germany, General Practitioners are free to choose type of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in AF. Our aim was to explore changes in prescription-rates of OAC in German primary care before and after introduction of NOAC on the market. METHODS: Data of a representative morbidity registration project in primary care in Germany (CONTENT) were analysed. Patients with AF in 2011 or 2014 were included (before and after broad market authorization of NOAC, respectively). We defined three independent groups: patients from 2011 without follow-up (group A), patients from 2014 but without previous record in 2011 (group B) and patients with AF and records in 2011 and 2014 (group C). RESULTS: 2642 patients were included. Group A (n = 804) and B (n = 755) were comparable regarding patient characteristics. 87.3% of group A and 84.8% of group B had CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≥ 2, indicating a need for oral anticoagulation (OAC). Prescription of OAC increased from 23.1% (n = 186) to 42.8% (n = 323, p < .01) with stable use of vitamin-k-antagonist (22.6-24.9%). NOAC increased from 0.6 to 19.2% (p < .01). Monotherapy with Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) decreased from 15.3% (n = 123) to 8.2% (n = 62, p < .01). In group C (n = 1083), OAC increased from 35.3 to 55.4% (p < .01), with stable prescription rate of vitamin-k-antagonist (34.4-35.7%). NOAC increased from 0.9 to 21.5% (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our study showed a significant increase of OAC over time, which is fostered by the use of NOAC but with a stable rate of VKA and a sharp decrease of ASA. Patients on VKA are rarely switched to NOAC, but new patients with AF are more likely to receive NOAC.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as part of primary health care in Germany-comparison of patients consulting general practitioners and CAM practitioners: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in primary health care is offered by general practitioners (GPs) and by natural health practitioners, so called 'Heilpraktiker' (HPs). Considering the steadily growing number of unregulated HPs, the aim of the study was to assess characteristics of patients consulting HPs in comparison to patients consulting GPs. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, patients of randomly selected GPs and HPs were asked to complete a questionnaire about their health care status, health care behavior, and symptoms rated on the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP-D). Patient groups were compared based on health care provider (HP, GP with high use of CAM (CAM-GP), and GP with no/little use of CAM (nCAM-GP)) using Kruskal-Wallis tests and analyses of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Altogether, 567 patients (91 of 11 HPs, 223 of 15 CAM-GPs, 253 of 19 nCAM-GPs) filled in the questionnaire. Patients of HPs had a higher education level and were more often female. The most common reason for encounter among all three groups were musculoskeletal problems (30.2-31.1 %). Patients seeing HPs reported more psychological (4.4 % vs. 17.8 %), but less respiratory problems (19.9 % vs. 7.8 %), and longer symptom duration (>5 years: 21.1 % vs. 40.7 %), than patients of nCAM-GPs. CONCLUSIONS: The high percentage of patients with psychological illness and chronic health problems consulting HPs demonstrates the urgent need for action with regard to CAM therapy in primary care and regulation of natural health practitioners. Appropriate measures with regard to quality and patient safety should be taken given the growing numbers of HPs and the absence of a regulatory body.