Fish tank granuloma caused by Mycobacterium marinum.

INTRODUCTION: Mycobacterium marinum causes skin and soft tissue, bone and joint, and rare disseminated infections. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between treatment outcome and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. A total of 27 patients with M. marinum infections were enrolled. METHODS: Data on clinical characteristics and therapeutic methods were collected and analyzed. We also determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations of 7 antibiotics against 30 isolates from these patients. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received antimycobacterial agents with or without surgical debridement. Eighteen patients were cured, 8 failed to respond to treatment, and one was lost to follow-up. The duration of clarithromycin (147 vs. 28; p = 0.0297), and rifampicin (201 vs. 91; p = 0.0266) treatment in the cured patients was longer than that in the others. Surgical debridement was performed in 10 out of the 18 cured patients, and in 1 of another group (p = 0.0417). All the 30 isolates were susceptible to clarithromycin, amikacin, and linezolid; 29 (96.7%) were susceptible to ethambutol; 28 (93.3%) were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole; and 26 (86.7%) were susceptible to rifampicin. However, only 1 (3.3%) isolate was susceptible to doxycycline. DISCUSSION: Early diagnosis of the infection and appropriate antimicrobial therapy with surgical debridement are the mainstays of successful treatment. Clarithromycin and rifampin are supposed to be more effective agents.

Influence of teicoplanin MICs on treatment outcomes among patients with teicoplanin-treated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a hospital-based retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Higher vancomycin MIC values (≥1.5 mg/L via Etest) may be associated with vancomycin treatment failure among patients with serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. As there were limited similar data for teicoplanin, this retrospective cohort study intended to determine the predictive value of teicoplanin MICs for treatment failure among patients with MRSA bacteraemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with at least one blood culture positive for MRSA admitted to the hospital between January 2010 and January 2011 were reviewed. Patients with an age ≥18 years and receipt of teicoplanin therapy throughout the course or receipt of <72 h of vancomycin therapy and then teicoplanin for >3 days were enrolled. Teicoplanin Etest(®) MICs and treatment outcomes for MRSA bacteraemia were reviewed to identify the breakpoint of teicoplanin MICs influencing treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients enrolled, 56 had a lower teicoplanin MIC (≤1.5 mg/L) for MRSA and 45 had a higher MIC (>1.5 mg/L) for MRSA. A lower teicoplanin MIC was associated with a favourable outcome [37 (66.1%) versus 13 (28.9%); P<0.001] and a lower rate of bloodstream infection-related mortality [15 (26.8%) versus 22 (48.9%); P=0.022]. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bacteraemic pneumonia or higher Pittsburgh bacteraemia score had an unfavourable outcome (P=0.028, 0.022 and <0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that teicoplanin MIC >1.5 mg/L, higher Pittsburgh bacteraemia score and bacteraemic pneumonia were independent risk factors for unfavourable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: A higher teicoplanin MIC value (>1.5 mg/L) may predict an unfavourable outcome and higher mortality rate among teicoplanin-treated MRSA bacteraemic patients.