Relationship between resting-state functional connectivity and change in motor function after motor imagery intervention in patients with stroke: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, motor imagery has been proposed as a treatment modality for stroke owing to its feasibility in patients with severe motor impairment. Motor imagery-based interventions can be categorized as open- or closed-loop. Closed-loop intervention is based on voluntary motor imagery and induced peripheral sensory afferent (e.g., Brain Computer Interface (BCI)-based interventions). Meanwhile, open-loop interventions include methods without voluntary motor imagery or sensory afferent. Resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) is defined as a significant temporal correlated signal among functionally related brain regions without any stimulus. rs-FC is a powerful tool for exploring the baseline characteristics of brain connectivity. Previous studies reported changes in rs-FC after motor imagery interventions. Systematic reviews also reported the effects of motor imagery-based interventions at the behavioral level. This study aimed to review and describe the relationship between the improvement in motor function and changes in rs-FC after motor imagery in patients with stroke. REVIEW PROCESS: The literature review was based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched up to September 30, 2023. The included studies covered the following topics: illusion without voluntary action, motor imagery, action imitation, and BCI-based interventions. The correlation between rs-FC and motor function before and after the intervention was analyzed. After screening by two independent researchers, 13 studies on BCI-based intervention, motor imagery intervention, and kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation therapy were included. CONCLUSION: All studies relating to motor imagery in this review reported improvement in motor function post-intervention. Furthermore, all those studies demonstrated a significant relationship between the change in motor function and rs-FC (e.g., sensorimotor network and parietal cortex).

Parameter mapping of hemiplegic shoulder electrical stimulation for motor function: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation (ES) of the shoulder is effective in treating subluxation and shoulder pain. However, few studies have reported on ES of the hemiplegic shoulder with motor function as an outcome; thus, the method remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to map the existing evidence and identify the parameters for ES of the hemiplegic shoulder for motor function in stroke patients. METHODS: A literature search was performed through PubMed and Scopus to retrieve original articles from 1975 to March 2023 using the terms "stroke", "shoulder", and "electricity". We selected studies in which ES was performed on hemiplegic shoulders after stroke, parameters were described, and upper extremity motor functional assessment was included as an outcome. The extracted data included study design, phase, sample size, electrode position, parameters, intervention period, evaluation frequency, outcomes, and results. RESULTS: Of the 449 titles identified, 25 fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nineteen were randomized controlled trials. The most common electrode positions and parameters (frequency and pulse width) were over the posterior deltoid and the supraspinatus (upper trapezius) muscles, 30 Hz, and 250µs, respectively. The intervention period was 30-60 minutes per day, 5-7 days per week, for 4-5 weeks in over half of the studies. CONCLUSION: Stimulation positions and parameters for electrical stimulation of the hemiplegic shoulder are inconsistent. Whether ES represents a significant treatment option remains unclear. Establishing universal ES methods is necessary to improve the motor function of hemiplegic shoulders.