Effect of Stimulation Current in Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS): A Study Using Concurrent Magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation that has been investigated for its use in the clinical treatment of a number of different conditions. There has been little investigation into the stimulation current that is delivered and the effect on individual variability in response to tVNS.Seventeen participants underwent tVNS, and stimulation current was determined based on individual pain threshold. To investigate individual variability, brain dynamics were measured concurrently using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in response to two different stimulation protocols of tVNS. The first protocol consisted of a sequence of equally spaced short (1ms) stimulation pulses applied 24 times per second (24 Hz), and the second consisted of a sequence of 24 pulses per second spaced according to a 6 Hz pulse frequency modulation (PFM). Both stimulation sequences were delivered to the cymba concha in the left ear.The difference in brain responses to the two sequences was initially calculated using a one-sample t-test at the group level, based on z-scoring of the data at the individual level, and no statistically significant differences were observed. Further investigation of individual variability suggested that participants fell into two groups; one that responded more strongly to 24 Hz and one that responded more strongly to the irregular spacing of pulses in the PFM protocol.We tested whether the stimulation current that the participant received could predict how they would respond to the stimulation, but we did not observe any correlation. This supports the literature that suggests that selecting stimulation current based on individual pain threshold is a suitable procedure for tVNS, and higher stimulation intensities does not correspond to stronger brain response. Further investigation into individual variability in response to different frequencies and pulse spacing of tVNS should also be investigated further and may lead to the development of personalised stimulation protocols.Clinical relevance- The stimulation current at which tVNS is delivered does not appear to influence brain response to stimulation, and the value of stimulation current should be selected based on individual participant comfort.

Functional Connectivity Analysis of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) Using Magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Altered brain functional connectivity has been observed in conditions such as schizophrenia, dementia and depression and may represent a target for treatment. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that is increasingly used in the treatment of a variety of health conditions. We previously combined tVNS with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and observed that various stimulation frequencies affected different brain areas in healthy individuals. We further investigated whether tVNS had an effect on functional connectivity with a focus on brain regions associated with mood. We compared functional connectivity (whole-head and region of interest) in response to four stimulation frequencies of tVNS using data collected from concurrent MEG and tVNS in 17 healthy participants using Weighted Phase Lag Index (WPLI) to calculate correlation between brain areas. Different frequencies of stimulation lead to changes in functional connectivity across multiple regions, notably areas linked to the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN) and the central executive network (CEN). It was observed that tVNS delivered at a frequency of 24 Hz was the most effective in increasing functional connectivity between these areas and sub-networks in healthy participants. Our results indicate that tVNS can alter functional connectivity in regions that have been associated with mood and memory disorders. Varying the stimulation frequency led to alterations in different brain areas, which may suggest that personalized stimulation protocols can be developed for the targeted treatment of different medical conditions using tVNS.

Measuring brain response to transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) using simultaneous magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Objective.Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that delivers a sequence of electrical pulses to the auricular branch of the vagus nerve and is used increasingly in the treatment of a number of health conditions such as epilepsy and depression. Recent research has focused on the efficacy of tVNS to treat different medical conditions, but there is little conclusive evidence concerning the optimal stimulation parameters. There are relatively few studies that have combined tVNS with a neuroimaging modality, and none that have attempted simultaneous magnetoencephalography (MEG) and tVNS due to the presence of large stimulation artifacts produced by the electrical stimulation which are many orders of magnitude larger than underlying brain activity.Approach.The aim of this study is to investigate the utility of MEG to gain insight into the regions of the brain most strongly influenced by tVNS and how variation of the stimulation parameters can affect this response in healthy participants.Main results.We have successfully demonstrated that MEG can be used to measure brain response to tVNS. We have also shown that varying the stimulation frequency can lead to a difference in brain response, with the brain also responding in different anatomical regions depending on the frequency.Significance.The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate the feasibility of simultaneous pulsed tVNS and MEG recording, allowing direct investigation of the changes in brain activity that result from different stimulation parameters. This may lead to the development of customised therapeutic approaches for the targeted treatment of different conditions.

Effect of Salt Supplementation on Sympathetic Activity and Endothelial Function in Salt-Sensitive Type 2 Diabetes.

CONTEXT: Lower sodium intake is paradoxically associated with higher mortality in type 2 diabetes (T2D). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation and endothelial dysfunction contribute to these observations, we examined the effect of salt supplementation on these systems in people with T2D with habitual low sodium. We hypothesized that salt supplementation would lower SNS activity and improve endothelial function compared to placebo. DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial. SETTING: The study took place in a tertiary referral diabetes outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two people with T2D with habitual low sodium intake (24-hour urine sodium <150 mmol/24h) were included. INTERVENTION: Salt supplementation (100 mmol NaCl/24h) or placebo for 3 weeks was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of SNS activity and endothelial function was assessed as follows: Microneurography assessed muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), pulse amplitude tonometry assessed endothelial function via reactive hyperemic index (RHI), and arterial stiffness was assessed via augmentation index (AI). Secondary outcomes included cardiac baroreflex, serum aldosterone, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), heart rate variability (HRV), and salt sensitivity. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, salt supplementation increased MSNA (burst frequency P = .047, burst incidence P = .016); however, RHI (P = .24), AI (P = .201), ABPM (systolic P = .09, diastolic P = .14), and HRV were unaffected. Salt supplementation improved baroreflex (slope P = .026) and lowered aldosterone (P = .004), and in salt-resistant individuals there was a trend toward improved RHI (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: In people with T2D and low habitual sodium intake, salt supplementation increased SNS activity without altering endothelial function or blood pressure but improved baroreflex function, a predictor of cardiac mortality. Salt-resistant individuals trended toward improved endothelial function with salt supplementation.

#MindinBody - feasibility of vigorous exercise (Bikram yoga versus high intensity interval training) to improve persistent pain in women with a history of trauma: a pilot randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: The neurobiology of persistent pain shares common underlying psychobiology with that of traumatic stress. Modern treatments for traumatic stress often involve bottom-up sensorimotor retraining/exposure therapies, where breath, movement, balance and mindfulness, are used to target underlying psychobiology. Vigorous exercise, in particular Bikram yoga, combines many of these sensorimotor/exposure therapeutic features. However, there is very little research investigating the feasibility and efficacy of such treatments for targeting the underlying psychobiology of persistent pain. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trail (RCT) comparing the efficacy of Bikram yoga versus high intensity interval training (HIIT), for improving persistent pain in women aged 20 to 50 years. The participants were 1:1 randomized to attend their assigned intervention, 3 times per week, for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and further pain related biopsychosocial secondary outcomes, including SF-36 Medical Outcomes and heart rate variability (HRV), were also explored. Data was collected pre (t0) and post (t1) intervention via an online questionnaire and physiological testing. RESULTS: A total of 34 women were recruited from the community. Analyses using ANCOVA demonstrated no significant difference in BPI (severity plus interference) scores between the Bikram yoga (n = 17) and the HIIT (n = 15). Women in the Bikram yoga group demonstrated significantly improved SF-36 subscale physical functioning: [ANCOVA: F(1, 29) = 6.17, p = .019, partial eta-squared effect size (ηp2) = .175 and mental health: F(1, 29) = 9.09, p = .005, ηp2 = .239; and increased heart rate variability (SDNN): F(1, 29) = 5.12, p = .013, ηp2 = .150, scores compared to the HIIT group. Across both groups, pain was shown to decrease, no injuries were experienced and retention rates were 94% for Bikram yoga and 75% for HIIT . CONCLUSIONS: Bikram yoga does not appear a superior exercise compared to HIIT for persistent pain. However, imporvements in quality of life measures and indicator of better health were seen in the Bikram yoga group. The outcomes of the present study suggest vigorous exercise interventions in persistent pain cohorts are feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12617001507370 , 26/10/2017).

Metabolic syndrome: a sympathetic disease?

Metabolic syndrome is associated with adverse health outcomes and is a growing problem worldwide. Although efforts to harmonise the definition of metabolic syndrome have helped to better understand the prevalence and the adverse outcomes associated with the disorder on a global scale, the mechanisms underpinning the metabolic changes that define it are incompletely understood. Accumulating evidence from laboratory and human studies suggests that activation of the sympathetic nervous system has an important role in metabolic syndrome. Indeed, treatment strategies commonly recommended for patients with metabolic syndrome, such as diet and exercise to induce weight loss, are associated with sympathetic inhibition. Pharmacological and device-based approaches to target activation of the sympathetic nervous system directly are available and have provided evidence to support the important part played by sympathetic regulation, particularly for blood pressure and glucose control. Preliminary evidence is encouraging, but whether therapeutically targeting sympathetic overactivity could help to prevent metabolic syndrome and attenuate its adverse outcomes remains to be determined.