Returning childbirth to inuit communities in the Canadian Arctic.

While Inuit living in Nunavut have been advocating for decades for the return of birthing to their own communities, over two-third of births continue to occur outside of the territory. We conducted a literature review to answer the question, why has birthplace choice not been given back to Inuit yet. Based on our review we identified a number of factors impacting birthplace choice, including the organisation of the Nunavut medical system that is focused on primary health care and that cannot easily accommodate the potential clinical risks Western health care associates with birthing, often in isolation from socio-cultural risks; staffing vacancies and turn over in Nunavut, which creates challenges in continuity of care and in maintaining trust; and trends in Canada towards the medicalisation of birthing, which resulted in the displacement of traditional midwifery, and lately in the professionalisation of midwifery with training centres mostly located outside of Nunavut. We recognise that providing more options to birth in the north is complex. While birthing in the north as an option is a given objective, operationalising this objective in a consistent manner is likely going to be a challenge for years to come.

Addressing anti-Indigenous racism in Canadian health systems: multi-tiered approaches are required.

Interpersonal and structural racism is a significant contributor to pronounced and widespread health inequities affecting Indigenous peoples in Canada. Recent events surrounding the tragic death of Ms. Joyce Echaquan in Quebec have renewed attention to the devastating harms of Indigenous-specific racism. A recent series of meetings convened at the federal-provincial-territorial levels resulted in the identification of short- and long-term actions to eliminate anti-Indigenous racism. While these represent important starting points, we raise concerns about the shortcomings of these actions. In presenting our commentary, we highlight additional strategies and recommendations for embedding anti-racism into Canada's health sector, including a call to adopt anti-racism as a sixth pillar of the Canada Health Act. We contend that adding anti-racism to the Canada Health Act will prompt national dialogues, trigger the development of universal policies and programs to interrupt systemic and interpersonal racism in health systems, and be sustainable over time despite changes in governments and political ideologies. In taking this position, our aim in presenting this commentary is to intensify the dialogue in Canada regarding the need for multi-tiered, system-level efforts to address anti-Indigenous racism with the explicit aim of transforming healthcare cultures, policies, and practices in support of health equity and reconciliation.

RéSUMé: Le racisme interpersonnel et structurel au sein du système de santé est un contributeur important aux inégalités de santé prononcées et répandues chez les peuples autochtones du Canada. Les événements récents entourant la mort tragique de Mme Joyce Echaquan au Québec ont renouvelé l'attention sur les effets dévastateurs du racisme envers les Autochtones. Une récente série de réunions convoquées aux niveaux fédéral-provincial-territorial a permis d'identifier des mesures à court et à long terme pour éliminer le racisme anti-autochtone. Bien que ceux-ci représentent des points de départ importants, nous voulons soulever des inquiétudes quant aux lacunes de ces mesures. En présentant notre analyse, nous soulignons d'autres stratégies et recommandations visant à intégrer la lutte contre le racisme dans le secteur canadien de la santé, y compris un appel à adopter la lutte contre le racisme comme sixième pilier de la Loi canadienne sur la santé. Nous soutenons que l'ajout de la lutte contre le racisme à la Loi canadienne sur la santé suscitera des dialogues nationaux, déclenchera l'élaboration de politiques et de programmes universels pour interrompre le racisme systémique et interpersonnel dans les systèmes de santé et sera durable au fil du temps malgré les changements dans les gouvernements et les idéologies politiques. En prenant cette position, notre objectif en présentant ce commentaire est d'intensifier le dialogue au Canada sur la nécessité d'efforts à plusieurs niveaux au niveau du système pour lutter contre le racisme anti-autochtone dans le but explicite de transformer les cultures, les politiques et les pratiques de soins de santé à l'appui de l'équité et de la réconciliation en matière de santé.

Decolonizing health in Canada: A Manitoba first nation perspective.

INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: Global persistence of health inequities for Indigenous peoples is evident in ongoing discrepancies in health and standards of living. International literature suggests the key to transformation lies in Indigenous efforts to control Indigenous health and healthcare. Previous authors have focused upon participation, structural transformation, and culturally appropriate healthcare recognized as a political right as fundamental tenets of Indigenous control. Contextualizing Indigenous health and wellness falls within a growing discussion on decolonization - a resituating of expertise that privileges Indigenous voice and interests. METHODS: The study is a qualitative, grounded theory analysis, which is a constructivist approach to social research allowing for generation of theory in praxis, through interactions and conversations between researchers and participants. One hundred eighty-three interviews with additional focus groups were held between 2013-15 in eight Manitoba First Nation communities representing different models of health delivery, geographies, accessibilities, and Indigenous language groups. Community research assistants and respected Elders participated in data collection, analysis and interpretation. Line-by-line coding and constant comparative method led to the discovery of converging themes. FINDINGS: Ultimately four main themes arose: 1) First Nation control of healthcare; 2) traditional medicine and healing activities; 3) full and meaningful community participation; and 4) cleaning up impacts of colonization. Joint analyses and interpretation of findings revealed substantial evidence that communities were looking profoundly into problems of improperly delivered services and health inequities. Issues were consistent with those highlighted by international commissions on reconciliation, health, Indigenous rights and liberties. To those documents, these findings add ground upon which to build the transformative agenda. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: Communities discussed the need for creation of protocols, constitution and laws to ensure growth of a decolonizing agenda. Inclusive to the concept are holistic, preventative, traditional health perspectives, and Indigenous languages. Colonization impacts were of critical concern and in need of undoing. Sharing of social and political efforts is seen as pivotal to change and includes all members of communities.

The Two Great Healing Traditions: Issues, Opportunities, and Recommendations for an Integrated First Nations Healthcare System in Canada.

The First Nations in Manitoba, Canada, are calling for active recognition and incorporation of holistic traditional healing and medicine ways and approaches by the mainstream healthcare system that has hitherto tended to ignore all but biomedical approaches. This request for recognition requires elaboration on areas of opportunity for collaboration that could positively influence both Indigenous and allopathic medicine. We discuss pathways to an integrated healthcare system as community-based primary healthcare transformation. A community-based participatory research approach was used to engage eight Manitoba First Nations communities. One hundred and eighty-three (183) in-depth, semi-structured key informant interviews were completed in all communities. Grounded theory guided data analysis using NVivo 10 software. We learned that increased recognition and incorporation of traditional healing and medical methods would enhance a newly envisioned funded health system. Elders and healers will be meaningfully involved in the delivery of community-based primary health care. Funding for traditional healing and medicines are necessary components of primary health care. An overall respect for Indigenous health knowledge would aid transformation in community-based primary health care. Recognition of and respect for traditional healing, healers, medicines, therapies, and approaches is also recommended as part of addressing the legacy and intergenerational impact of assimilative policies including Indian residential schools as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada has stated in its Calls to Action.

Indigenous Men Adhering to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: Navigating Through Culturally Unsafe Spaces While Caring for Their Health.

Introduction: Indigenous peoples in Canada have endured and continue to experience the impact of colonization by European settlers. The deleterious manifestations of intergenerational historic trauma (HT) are evidenced in the high HIV/AIDS epidemic-related premature mortality rates among Indigenous men, despite the availability of novel highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAARTs). Aim: The aims of this study were to explore the impact of historic trauma (HT) on treatment adherence and health promoting practices among Indigenous men living with HIV, and how resilience was both expressed and mediated by survivor status. Methods: This interpretive description study incorporated a cultural safety lens. Through partnership with the Vancouver Native Health Society, 36 male HT survivors were recruited using purposive and theoretical sampling. They told their lived experiences and health promoting practices with respect to HAART adherence through interviews and a focus group. Results: Two broad categories (findings) emerged: (1) resilience as facilitator of HAART adherence; and (2) differential views on HT's impact. Resilience was expressed through nine concepts. Conclusion: Most Indigenous men in this study demonstrate health promoting behavior, stay on HAART and have better health and well-being even if the environments they live in are marginalized or heavily stigmatizing. This study shows that areas of strength and adaptation, including factors promoting resilience can be harnessed to foster HAART adherence. With a consideration of these areas of strength and adaptation, this study offers implications for research and recommendations to improve treatment-adherent behavior, fostering healing from HT, and reducing HIV/AIDS-related deaths.

Employing a Harm-Reduction Approach Between Women and Girls Within Indigenous Familial Relationships.

It is important to recognize that experiences of racial and gendered violence are a sad legacy of colonialism. The experiences of historical trauma are on-going. These affect the mental and physical wellbeing of individuals, families and communities. Addressing historical trauma through community-informed practices is central to creating space for meaningful change. This paper outlines results from a seven-week activity-based research workshop conducted on three separate occasions with urban-based First Nations and Metis women and girls (aged 8-12). Using a decolonizing theoretical framework, this paper examines data collected within three specific arts-based activities: empowerment bracelets, "I'm proud of you" charm bracelets and "Who I am" pictures. Women were hesitant to discuss future plans, as many were not confident that their daughters would be in contact with their maternal families when they become teenagers. Girls observed and mimicked the thoughts and actions of their mothers, step-mothers, aunts, older sisters and grandmothers. They demonstrated the role they already play within the discourse of what it means to be female living within their communities. This paper concludes with the implicit harm reduction approach women and girls used when exploring the impacts of trauma while envisioning a healthier future.

Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: The concept of patient engagement in health research has received growing international recognition over recent years. Yet despite some critical advancements, we argue that the concept remains problematic as it negates the very real complexities and context of people's lives. Though patient engagement conceptually begins to disrupt the identity of "researcher," and complicate our assumptions and understandings around expertise and knowledge, it continues to essentialize the identity of "patient" as a homogenous group, denying the reality that individuals' economic, political, cultural, subjective and experiential lives intersect in intricate and multifarious ways. DISCUSSION: Patient engagement approaches that do not consider the simultaneous interactions between different social categories (e.g. race, ethnicity, Indigeneity, gender, class, sexuality, geography, age, ability, immigration status, religion) that make up social identity, as well as the impact of systems and processes of oppression and domination (e.g. racism, colonialism, classism, sexism, ableism, homophobia) exclude the involvement of individuals who often carry the greatest burden of illness - the very voices traditionally less heard in health research. We contend that in order to be a more inclusive and meaningful approach that does not simply reiterate existing health inequities, it is important to reconceptualize patient engagement through a health equity and social justice lens by incorporating a trauma-informed intersectional analysis. This article provides key concepts to the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis and important questions to consider when developing a patient engagement strategy in health research training, practice and evaluation. In redefining the identity of both "patient" and "researcher," spaces and opportunities to resist and renegotiate power within the intersubjective relations can be recognized and addressed, in turn helping to build trust, transparency and resiliency - integral to the advancement of the science of patient engagement in health research.

Implementing Indigenous community control in health care: lessons from Canada.

Objective Over past decades, Australian and Canadian Indigenous primary healthcare policies have focused on supporting community controlled Indigenous health organisations. After more than 20 years of sustained effort, over 89% of eligible communities in Canada are currently engaged in the planning, management and provision of community controlled health services. In Australia, policy commitment to community control has also been in place for more than 25 years, but implementation has been complicated by unrealistic timelines, underdeveloped change management processes, inflexible funding agreements and distrust. This paper discusses the lessons from the Canadian experience to inform the continuing efforts to achieve the implementation of community control in Australia. Methods We reviewed Canadian policy and evaluation grey literature documents, and assessed lessons and recommendations for relevance to the Australian context. Results Our analysis yielded three broad lessons. First, implementing community control takes time. It took Canada 20 years to achieve 89% implementation. To succeed, Australia will need to make a firm long term commitment to this objective. Second, implementing community control is complex. Communities require adequate resources to support change management. And third, accountability frameworks must be tailored to the Indigenous primary health care context to be meaningful. Conclusions We conclude that although the Canadian experience is based on a different context, the processes and tools created to implement community control in Canada can help inform the Australian context. What is known about the topic? Although Australia has promoted Indigenous control over primary healthcare (PHC) services, implementation remains incomplete. Enduring barriers to the transfer of PHC services to community control have not been addressed in the largely sporadic attention to this challenge to date, despite significant recent efforts in some jurisdictions. What does this paper add? The Canadian experience indicates that transferring PHC from government to community ownership requires sustained commitment, adequate resourcing of the change process and the development of a meaningful accountability framework tailored to the sector. What are the implications for practitioners? Policy makers in Australia will need to attend to reform in contractual arrangements (towards pooled or bundled funding), adopt a long-term vision for transfer and find ways to harmonise the roles of federal and state governments. The arrangements achieved in some communities in the Australian Coordinated Care Trials (and still in place) provide a model.