Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Integr Complement Med ; 29(6-7): 420-429, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971840

RESUMO

Background: Complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches have been recommended in national and international clinical guidelines for chronic pain management. We set out to determine whether exposure to CIH approaches is associated with pain care quality (PCQ) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care setting. Methods: We followed a cohort of 62,721 Veterans with newly diagnosed musculoskeletal disorders between October 2016 and September 2017 over 1-year. PCQ scores were derived from primary care progress notes using natural language processing. CIH exposure was defined as documentation of acupuncture, chiropractic or massage therapies by providers. Propensity scores (PSs) were used to match one control for each Veteran with CIH exposure. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine associations between CIH exposure and PCQ scores, accounting for potential selection and confounding bias. Results: CIH was documented for 14,114 (22.5%) Veterans over 16,015 primary care clinic visits during the follow-up period. The CIH exposure group and the 1:1 PS-matched control group achieved superior balance on all measured baseline covariates, with standardized differences ranging from 0.000 to 0.045. CIH exposure was associated with an adjusted rate ratio (aRR) of 1.147 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.142, 1.151) on PCQ total score (mean: 8.36). Sensitivity analyses using an alternative PCQ scoring algorithm (aRR: 1.155; 95% CI: 1.150-1.160) and redefining CIH exposure by chiropractic alone (aRR: 1.118; 95% CI: 1.110-1.126) derived consistent results. Discussion: Our data suggest that incorporating CIH approaches may reflect higher overall quality of care for patients with musculoskeletal pain seen in primary care settings, supporting VHA initiatives and the Declaration of Astana to build comprehensive, sustainable primary care capacity for pain management. Future investigation is warranted to better understand whether and to what degree the observed association may reflect the therapeutic benefits patients actually received or other factors such as empowering provider-patient education and communication about these approaches.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Terapias Complementares , Humanos , Saúde dos Veteranos , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Terapias Complementares/métodos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde
2.
Pain Med ; 19(suppl_1): S19-S29, 2018 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30203009

RESUMO

Background: Rates of pain among veterans are as high as 60%; rates approach 80% in women seeking Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care. Prior studies examined experiences managing pain in community samples, with gender disparities observed. As the largest national integrated health care system in the country, the VA offers a unique environment to a) study perceptions of pain care among men and women and b) contrast experiences using an integrated health care setting with prior observations in the private sector. Methods: A purposive sample of chronic pain patients was recruited to qualitatively describe perceptions of managing pain in an integrated health care system (VA) and to explore gender differences. A constant comparative approach with sequential analysis was used to reach thematic consensus. Results: Ten focus groups (N = 48; six groups of women [N = 22]; four groups of men [N = 26]) revealed an overarching theme, "just keep plugging," which reflected pain as a constant struggle. Three subthemes emerged: "always a reacquaintance process" described frustration with the use of trainees in the medical center. The need to navigate "so many hoops" referred to frustrations with logistical barriers. "To medicate or not" reflected tensions around medication use. A distinct theme, "the challenges of being female," reflected women's perceptions of stigma and bias. Conclusions: Most of the identified challenges were not unique to the integrated setting. Findings revealed advantages to receiving pain care in this setting. Tensions between patient expectations and guidelines governing provider behavior emerged. Improved patient education, provider communication and sensitivity to the unique needs of women may optimize care.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/psicologia , Dor Crônica/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/psicologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Idoso , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas
3.
Pain Med ; 19(suppl_1): S30-S37, 2018 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30203015

RESUMO

Objective: The "stepped care model of pain management" (SCM-PM) prioritizes the role of primary care providers in optimizing pharmacological management and timely and equitable access to patient-centered, evidence-based nonpharmacological approaches, when indicated. Over the past several years, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has supported implementation of SCM-PM, but few data exist regarding changes in pain care resulting from implementation. We examined trends in prescribing and referral practices of primary care providers with hypotheses of decreased opioid prescribing, increased nonopioid prescribing, and increased referrals to specialty care for nonpharmacological services. Design: An initiative was designed to foster implementation and systematic evaluation of the SCM-PM over a five-year period at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System (VACHS) while fostering collaborative, partnered initiatives to promote organizational improvements in the delivery of pain care. Subjects: Participants were veterans receiving care at VACHS with at least one pain intensity rating ≥4/10 over the course of the study period (7/2008-6/2013). Methods: We used electronic health record data to examine changes in indicators of pain care including pharmacy and health care utilization data. Results: We observed hypothesized changes in long-term opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescribing and increased utilization of nonpharmacological treatments such as physical therapy, occupational therapy, and clinical health psychology. Conclusions: Through a multifaceted comprehensive implementation approach, primary care providers demonstrated increases in guideline-concordant pain care practices. Findings suggest that engagement of interdisciplinary teams and partnerships to promote organizational improvements is a useful strategy to increase the use of integrated, multimodal pain care for veterans, consistent with VHA's SCM-PM.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/epidemiologia , Manejo da Dor/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/tendências , Saúde dos Veteranos/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA