Perineal repair performed by midwives in Australia: A cross-sectional survey study of education and practice.

PROBLEM: Perineal repair is generally not a widely practiced skill amongst Australian midwives, the reasons for this are uncertain and may result in technique variations. BACKGROUND: Many birthing women experience perineal tears that require suturing. As midwives attend the majority of vaginal births, they would be ideally placed to undertake perineal repair. AIM: To describe the current level of midwifery perineal repair skill acquisition, knowledge, techniques and utilization by Australian midwives. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to Australian College of Midwives members and shared via social media. Data on demographics, suturing techniques, reasons why midwives did or did not suture and barriers to skill acquisition were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables including percentages, mean, standard deviation, median and range as appropriate. FINDINGS: 375 completed surveys were received between April and May 2023. 197 midwives indicated current suturing practice and 178 did not suture. Contributing to continuity of care was the most common motivating factor. The use of a continuous suturing technique for all layers of a perineal injury was reported by the majority of suturing midwives. There was greater variation in the management of labial tears. Low numbers of skilled midwives to support attaining competency and high workloads were the main barriers to attaining suturing skills. DISCUSSION: Australian midwives view perineal suturing as a valid midwifery skill that can contribute to continuity of care. Largely organisational barriers exist to skill development and greater utilisation. CONCLUSION: Perineal repair should be prioritised as a fundamental midwifery skill.

A pre-post implementation study of a care bundle to reduce perineal trauma in unassisted births conducted by midwives.

PROBLEM: The perineal-bundle is a complex intervention widely implemented in Australian maternity care facilities. BACKGROUND: Most bundle components have limited or conflicting evidence and the implementation required many midwives to change their usual practice for preventing perineal trauma. AIM: To measure the effect of perineal bundle implementation on perineal injury for women having unassisted births with midwives. METHODS: A retrospective pre-post implementation study design to determine rates of second degree, severe perineal trauma, and episiotomy. Women who had an unassisted, singleton, cephalic vaginal birth at term between two time periods: January 2011 - November 2017 and August 2018 - August 2020 with a midwife or midwifery student accoucheur. We conducted logistic regression on the primary outcomes to control for confounding variables. FINDINGS: data from 20,155 births (pre-implementation) and 6273 (post-implementation) were analysed. After implementation, no significant difference in likelihood of severe perineal trauma was demonstrated (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04, p = 0.124). Nulliparous women were more likely to receive an episiotomy (aOR 1.49 95% CI 1.31-1.70 p < 0.001) and multiparous women to suffer a second degree tear (aOR 1.18 95% CI 1.09-1.27 p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This study adds to the growing body of literature which suggests a number of bundle components are ineffective, and some potentially harmful. Why, and how, the bundle was introduced at scale without a research framework to test efficacy and safety is a key concern. CONCLUSION: Suitably designed trials should be undertaken on all proposed individual or grouped perineal protection strategies prior to broad adoption.

Midwives experiences of interventions to improve breast expression following preterm birth: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth impacts approximately 10% of women globally. Midwives are often the first point of care after the birth of a preterm infant providing mothers with information and support for breast expression. However, despite guidelines that suggest expression within the first hour of birth, most first expressions occur much later. This study aimed to seek an understanding of midwives' experiences with the first expression for mothers of preterm infants, including the barriers and facilitators that midwives may face. DESIGN: A qualitative design using semi-structured interviews via focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to identify relevant themes and sub-themes. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included midwives providing care to women in preterm labour and birth at a tertiary maternity hospital in Australia (N=12). All participating midwives cared for mothers of preterm infants between 28 and 35 weeks' gestation up to six hours following birth. FINDINGS: Two major themes resulted from the data, including the changing expectations of infant feeding and the responsibility versus expectation to support a woman to express in the first hour of birth with other competing clinical and organisational tasks. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Whilst individual philosophies on the benefits of human milk were positive, expressing in the birth suite was dictated by essential clinical tasks and by the institutions value placed on expressing in the first hour. Clear objectives to undertake expressing within the first hour or within the birth suite stay, need to be included in policy and supported by management and team leaders, to increase early expressing rates.

A Comparison of the Timing of Hand Expressing of Human Milk With Breast Massage to Standard Care for Mothers of Preterm Infants: An Exploratory Pilot Using a Randomized Controlled Design.

BACKGROUND: Globally, 10% of all births are preterm. Access to human milk via manual breast expression is required to reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes related to prematurity. However, there is little evidence to recommend optimum timing to commence breast expression in mothers of preterm infants or the most effective method. RESEARCH AIMS: (1) To test feasibility of recruitment and compliance to the protocol and (2) to determine influence of using hand expressing and breast massage on milk production, engorgement, mastitis, and breastfeeding status at 3 months. METHODS: This study was an exploratory parallel two-group, pilot randomized controlled trial. Mothers of preterm infants at a metropolitan maternity hospital in Queensland Australia (N = 31) were randomized to receive either hand expressing and breast massage within the 1st hr of birth or standard care, hand expressing within 6 hr of birth, to determine the influence on milk production, engorgement, mastitis, and breastfeeding status at 3 months. RESULTS: Feasibility targets were not met; however, valuable learning from this trial uncovered barriers facing midwives in the birth suite to commencing expressing in the 1st hr of birth. There was no difference in occurrence of secondary outcomes, although trends support future study. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, unpredictability of preterm birth influenced our ability to recruit participants. Important directions for future study design would benefit from incorporating expressing times up to 6 hr with a replicable breast massage.

Midwife-Led Continuity of Antenatal Care and Breastfeeding Duration Beyond Postpartum Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of life and that breastfeeding should continue for 2 years and beyond. Most women initiate breastfeeding, but many do not continue for the recommended duration. While midwife-led continuity of antenatal care is linked to improved mother and infant outcomes, the influence on breastfeeding duration has not been previously reviewed. RESEARCH AIM: To critically analyze the literature that compared midwife-led continuity of antenatal care with other models of care where researchers have measured breastfeeding duration beyond postpartum hospital discharge. METHODS: A systematic literature review with critical analysis was used to answer the research aim. We systematically searched and screened five databases for quantitative studies where researchers had reported breastfeeding duration beyond postpartum hospital discharge after midwife-led continuity of antenatal care, compared with another model of antenatal care. Methodological quality was assessed using tools from the Cochrane Collaboration (RoB2 and ROBINS-I). In total, nine studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Clear conclusions about the association between midwife-led continuity of antenatal care and breastfeeding duration were not found. The risk of bias within non-randomized studies ranged from serious to critical, and a judgement of "some concerns" of risk of bias in the one randomized study. CONCLUSION: To date, the question of whether midwife-led continuity of antenatal care improves breastfeeding duration has not been established. There has been a lack of consistency in definitions of breastfeeding and descriptions of models of care, which has weakened the evidence-based of literature reviewed.Our review protocol was registered with PROSPERO; although due to COVID-19, this registration was not checked for eligibility by the PROSPERO team (CRD42020151276). https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020151276.

Effect of topical local anaesthesia on injection pain associated with administration of sterile water injections - a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections can provide effective pain relief during childbirth, particularly for low back pain related to childbirth. However, the pain associated administering the injections can negatively impact women's impressions of the procedure. It may discourage women from considering repeat doses despite the quality of analgesia experienced. Determining strategies to reduce the pain related to the administration of sterile water injections would improve the acceptability of the technique. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical local anesthesia on the pain associated with administration of sterile water injections. METHODS: The study was designed as a multi-arm single-blind, randomized, controlled trial and 120 female healthy students were randomly divided according to one of four groups. The Intervention group received sterile water injections with topical local anesthesia. Control group 1 received sterile water injections without topical local anesthesia, control group 2 received injections of isotonic saline 0.9% with topical local anesthesia and control group 3 received injections of isotonic saline 0.9% without topical local anesthesia. Pain Immediately after the injections and subsidence in pain were recorded using a visual analogue scale. Sensations in the injection area were reported 15 min and the day after the injections. RESULTS: The main finding of this study was that local anesthesia with EMLA® reduces the pain associated with the administration of intracutaneous sterile water injections. There was a significant difference in the self-assessed pain score immediately following the injections between the control (73.3 mm) and intervention groups (50.0 mm), p = 0.001. No adverse side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia with EMLA® reduces the pain associated with intracutaneous administration of sterile water injections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered 08/07/2014 at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02213185 .

How a perineal care bundle impacts midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals: A critical, reflexive thematic analysis.

BACKGROUND: A care bundle to reduce severe perineal trauma (the bundle) was introduced in 28 Australian maternity hospitals in 2018. The bundle includes five components of which only one - warm perineal compresses - has highest level evidence. There is scant published research about the impact of implementation of perineal bundles. QUESTION: How does a perineal care bundle impact midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals? METHODS: Purposively sampled midwives who worked in hospitals where the bundle had been implemented. Interested midwives were recruited to participate in one-to-one, semi-structured interviews. The researchers conducted critical, reflexive thematic analysis informed by Foucauldian concepts of power. FINDINGS: We interviewed 12 midwives from five hospitals in one state of Australia. Participants varied by age, clinical role, experience, and education. Three themes were generated: 1) bundle design and implementation 2) changing midwifery practice: obedience, subversion, and compliance; and 3) obstetric dominance and midwifery submission. DISCUSSION: The bundle exemplifies tensions between obstetric and midwifery constructs of safety in normal birth. Participants' responses appear consistent with oppressed group behaviour previously reported in nurses and midwives. Women expect midwives to facilitate maternal autonomy yet decision-making in maternity care is commonly geared towards obtaining consent. In our study midwives encouraged women to consent or decline depending on their personal preferences. CONCLUSION: The introduction of the perineal bundle acts as an exemplar of obstetric dominance in Australian maternity care. We recommend midwives advocate autonomy - women's and their own - by using clinical judgement, evidence, and woman-centred care.

Using simulation to teach undergraduate nursing and midwifery students research design.

Whilst it is widely accepted that the ability to critique, interpret and integrate research is an integral part of the evidence-based practice of nursing and midwifery, teaching such skills to undergraduate students is equally recognised as challenging. From a student's perspective the theoretical aspects, concepts and language of research design may seem far removed from the imperative of developing skills and gaining clinical experience. Simulation has been widely demonstrated as an effective pedagogical approach to engage students in learning and developing practical skills. The 'hands-on' approach provides a cognitive link between theory and practice that is immediately relevant to the student. Simulation training has also been used in other areas of healthcare such as communication and ethics. However, the use of simulation to demonstrate the theoretical and practical aspects of research design to midwifery and nursing students has not been explored. This paper describes a novel approach to teaching undergraduate students fundamental concepts of randomised controlled trial design through their participation in a simulated research trial. Students experienced aspects such as consent, randomisation, intervention, data collection, analysis and interpretation. Post workshop evaluations suggest that students found the approach engaging, increased their knowledge and understanding of research and evidenced-based practice.

Effectiveness of breast massage for the treatment of women with breastfeeding problems: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to identify the effectiveness of breast massage as a treatment for women with breastfeeding problems. More specifically, the objective was to identify if breast massage as an intervention led to less pain or increased milk supply, or assisted in a reduction or resolution of blocked ducts, breast engorgement and mastitis. INTRODUCTION: Breastfeeding protects babies against many illnesses, and the health benefits for women have been well documented. However, breastfeeding rates steadily drop to approximately 15% by six months, which is the World Health Organization's recommended length of time for exclusive breastfeeding. Breastfeeding problems such as blocked ducts, breast engorgement and mastitis are major complications attributing to the decline in breastfeeding rates. Breast massage may relieve pain and resolve symptoms associated with conditions that contribute to discontinued breastfeeding. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review considered both experimental and epidemiological study designs and included breastfeeding women of any age, parity or geographical location. The types of interventions considered for inclusion were any type of breast massage that was offered to women for breastfeeding problems. Comparators included the usual care provided to women with breastfeeding problems. Primary outcomes of interest were an increase in breast milk supply, reduction of breast pain, and symptom resolution of blocked ducts, engorgement and mastitis. Secondary outcomes included duration of breastfeeding. METHODS: Studies published from 1980 to 2017 in English and Japanese were considered for inclusion in this review. The databases searched with the majority of results included CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. Search for unpublished studies included Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. RESULTS: There were six studies included in this review: three randomized controlled trials and three quasi-experimental studies. There was considerable heterogeneity of study outcome measures, and the use of unvalidated tools in many of the studies led to the inability to pool the results. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the interventions themselves coupled with small sample sizes for each study greatly decreased generalizability of the outcomes and reduced the overall effectiveness of the interventions. However, all included studies reported a reduction in pain regardless of the breast massage technique used. Overall, varying types of breast massage were helpful in reducing immediate pain and resolving symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, different types of breast massage were reported as effective in reducing immediate pain for the participants. However, the lack of detailed explanation of the breast massage technique and the extensive training needed to undertake the breast massage decrease the ability to replicate the results. These outcomes may be useful for healthcare professionals caring for women with breastfeeding problems. Future research needs include validating a universal measurement tool for breastfeeding problems and the need for more robust randomized controlled trials, particularly in vulnerable groups such as mothers of preterm infants. Longer follow-up periods are also suggested to establish if breast massage impacts breastfeeding duration.

Knowledge and use of sterile water injections amongst midwives in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The use of sterile water injections (SWI) for the relief of pain in labour is popular amongst midwives in countries such as Sweden and Australia. Anecdotal reports suggest the procedure is used less commonly in the United Kingdom (UK) and that a number of barriers to introducing the practice may exist. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the awareness and use of SWI amongst midwives in the UK. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study using an internet-based questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Midwives with Nursing and Midwifery Council Registration and currently practicing. SETTING: The questionnaire was distributed via the Royal College of Midwives Facebook page and Twitter account. Invitations to participate were also sent to Heads of Midwifery to distribute to staff. FINDINGS: Three hundred and ninety-eight midwives completed the survey. Eighty-two percent of midwives did not use SWI in practice although 69% would consider learning the procedure. There was considerable variation in techniques amongst midwives that did provide SWI. The lack of available practice guidelines and the advice from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to not use SWI were cited as the main barriers. KEY CONCLUSIONS: SWI use is uncommon in the UK although midwives are interested in incorporating the procedure into practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: National guidance on SWI and the lack of information and training is restricting the use of the procedure in practice, despite SWI being widely used in other countries and being effective in the treatment of pain in labour.

Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Backgound Partographs are used in many labour settings to provide a pictorial overview of a woman's cervical dilation pattern in the first stage of labor and to alert clinicians to slow progress possibly requiring intervention. Recent reviews called for large trials to establish the efficacy of partographs to improve birth outcomes whilst highlighting issues of clinician compliance with use. Previous studies have also reported issues with participant recruitment related to concerns regarding the possibility of a longer labour. Objectives We sought to compare a standard partograph with an action line, to a newly designed partograph with a stepped line, to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a larger clinical trial. Methods A pragmatic, single-blind randomised trial wherein low-risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term were randomized to an action-line or stepped-line partograph. First stage labour management was guided by the allocated partograph. Primary outcomes included the proportion of eligible women recruited, reasons for failed recruitment and compliance with partograph use. Secondary outcomes included rates of intervention, mode of birth, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results Of the 384 potentially eligible participants, 38% (149/384) were approached. Of these 77% (116/149) consented, with 85% (99/116) randomized, only nine women approached (6%) declined to participate. A further 9% (14/149) who were consented antenatally were not eligible at onset of labor and 7% (10/149) of women approached in the birth suite but did not meet the inclusion criteria. Compliance with partograph completion was 65% (action) versus 84% (dystocia line). Conclusions for Practice Participant recruitment to a larger randomized controlled trial comparing new labour management guidelines to standard care is feasible. Effective strategies to improve partograph completion compliance would be required to maintain trial fidelity.

'Tough love': The experiences of midwives giving women sterile water injections for the relief of back pain in labour.

OBJECTIVE: To explore midwives' experiences of administering sterile water injections (SWI) to labouring women as analgesia for back pain in labour. DESIGN: A qualitative study, which generated data through semi-structured focus group interviews with midwives. Data were analysed thematically. SETTING: Two metropolitan maternity units in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven midwives who had administered SWI for back pain in labour in a randomised controlled trial. FINDINGS: Three major themes were identified including: i. SWI, is it an intervention?; ii. Tough love, causing pain to relieve pain; iii. The analgesic effect of SWI and impact on midwifery practice. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Whilst acknowledging the potential benefits of SWI as an analgesic the midwives in this study described a dilemma between inflicting pain to relieve pain and the challenges encountered in their discussions with women when offering SWI. Midwives also faced conflict when women requested SWI in the face of institutional resistance to its use. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The procedural pain associated with SWI may discourage some midwives from offering women the procedure, providing women with accurate information regarding the intensity and the brevity of the injection pain and the expected degree of analgesic would assist in discussion about SWI with women.

"No pain, no gain": The experience of women using sterile water injections.

PROBLEM/BACKGROUND: Sterile water injections (SWI) are gaining popularity amongst women and midwives for the relief of back pain in labour. However the brief but intense pain associated with the injection has been cited as a deterrent to use and may negatively affect the birth experience. AIM: To explore women's experiences of using sterile water injections as analgesia for back pain in labour. DESIGN: A qualitative study, which generated data through individual semi-structured interviews with postnatal women. Data were analysed thematically. SETTING: Two metropolitan maternity units in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine postnatal women who had participated in a randomised controlled trial investigating the use of sterile water injections for back pain in labour FINDINGS: Three major themes were identified including sterile water injections as a non-pharmacological injection; balancing injection pain against expectations of pain relief; the analgesic effect of sterile water injections. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Women in this study largely viewed sterile water injections as an effective analgesia with few side effects. The pain associated with the injection of sterile water was weighed against the likelihood of rapid, effective pain relief. Women used the period of analgesia to support their objectives, be this a period of respite during the labour or to enhance the ability to focus on the birth experience. Information on SWI provided by health professionals should also balance realistic descriptions of the injection pain with prospect of analgesia.

'Facing the wrong way': Exploring the Occipito Posterior position/back pain discourse from women's and midwives perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: to explore back pain in labour from the perspectives of women and midwives. DESIGN: a qualitative study, which generated data through individual semi-structured interviews with postnatal women and focus groups with midwives. Data were analysed thematically. SETTING: two metropolitan maternity units in Queensland, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: nine postnatal women and 11 midwives, all of whom had participated in a randomized controlled trial investigating the use of sterile water injections for back pain in labour. FINDINGS: two major themes were identified, including back pain in labour: accounts, rationalisations and coping strategies, and fetal position: destabilising the Occipito Posterior-back pain discourse. KEY CONCLUSIONS: back pain may be severe in labour, may impact negatively upon women׳s labour and birth experiences, and interfere with their ability to cope as planned. The assumed relationship between fetal position and back pain in labour is a dominant discourse, albeit one which is lacking in empirical credibility. Nonetheless, the information provided to women by maternity professionals tended to reiterate customary practices and beliefs rather than factual knowledge. Increasingly, women refer to other sources, which may challenge the information provided by health professionals. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Back pain in labour is an under-researched area and the lack of solid evidence underpinning the advice provided to women has implications for labour management, and possibly for maternal and fetal outcomes. Care providers might usefully consider back pain as multifactorial, not always associated with OP position, and continue to seek evidence-based management strategies which address women׳s needs.

Cross sectional study of Australian midwives knowledge and use of sterile water injections for pain relief in labour.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of sterile water injections (SWI) to relieve back pain in labour is supported by a number of randomised controlled trials. Although the procedure is available in a number of Australian maternity units, there is no information regarding the use of SWI by midwives, in terms of knowledge and availability, clinical application or technique used. Neither is there any data on midwives who do not use SWI nor the specific challengers and barriers encountered by midwives introducing SWI. METHOD: An invitation to participate in an online survey was emailed to 4700 members of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM) and 484 members of CRANAplus (Remote Health Organisation). Nine hundred and seventy midwives completed the survey (19%). RESULTS: Four hundred and seven (42.5%) midwives currently used SWI in their practice and five hundred and fifty-one (57.5%) indicated they did not. Eighty-six percent (n=478/548) indicated they would consider using SWI and 90% (n=500/547) were interested in obtaining further information about SWI. The main reasons cited for not using SWI was the lack of a policy or guideline (n=271, 57.5%) and being unable to access workshops or resource material (n=68, 14.4%). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that SWI is not being used by the majority of midwives participating in the study, although there is a strong desire by midwives to learn about and explore its use. Greater access to information and workshops on SWI is highlighted. In response to the findings of this survey the authors are currently developing an online resource and training to support units to introduce SWI.