Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurology ; 95(9): e1244-e1256, 2020 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32690786

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of brain-responsive neurostimulation in adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures (FOS) over 9 years. METHODS: Adults treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation in 2-year feasibility or randomized controlled trials were enrolled in a long-term prospective open label trial (LTT) to assess safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QOL) over an additional 7 years. Safety was assessed as adverse events (AEs), efficacy as median percent change in seizure frequency and responder rate, and QOL with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-89) inventory. RESULTS: Of 256 patients treated in the initial trials, 230 participated in the LTT. At 9 years, the median percent reduction in seizure frequency was 75% (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank), responder rate was 73%, and 35% had a ≥90% reduction in seizure frequency. We found that 18.4% (47 of 256) experienced ≥1 year of seizure freedom, with 62% (29 of 47) seizure-free at the last follow-up and an average seizure-free period of 3.2 years (range 1.04-9.6 years). Overall QOL and epilepsy-targeted and cognitive domains of QOLIE-89 remained significantly improved (p < 0.05). There were no serious AEs related to stimulation, and the sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rate was significantly lower than predefined comparators (p < 0.05, 1-tailed χ2). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive brain-responsive neurostimulation provides significant and sustained reductions in the frequency of FOS with improved QOL. Stimulation was well tolerated; implantation-related AEs were typical of other neurostimulation devices; and SUDEP rates were low. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00572195. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that brain-responsive neurostimulation significantly reduces focal seizures with acceptable safety over 9 years.


Assuntos
Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Epilepsias Parciais/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Qualidade de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/psicologia , Epilepsias Parciais/fisiopatologia , Epilepsias Parciais/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Transtornos da Memória/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estado Epiléptico/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Inesperada na Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Epilepsia ; 61(3): 408-420, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32072621

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe seizure outcomes in patients with medically refractory epilepsy who had evidence of bilateral mesial temporal lobe (MTL) seizure onsets and underwent MTL resection based on chronic ambulatory intracranial EEG (ICEEG) data from a direct brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS) system. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients at 17 epilepsy centers with MTL epilepsy who were treated with the RNS System using bilateral MTL leads, and in whom an MTL resection was subsequently performed. Presumed lateralization based on routine presurgical approaches was compared to lateralization determined by RNS System chronic ambulatory ICEEG recordings. The primary outcome was frequency of disabling seizures at last 3-month follow-up after MTL resection compared to seizure frequency 3 months before MTL resection. RESULTS: We identified 157 patients treated with the RNS System with bilateral MTL leads due to presumed bitemporal epilepsy. Twenty-five patients (16%) subsequently had an MTL resection informed by chronic ambulatory ICEEG (mean = 42 months ICEEG); follow-up was available for 24 patients. After MTL resection, the median reduction in disabling seizures at last follow-up was 100% (mean: 94%; range: 50%-100%). Nine patients (38%) had exclusively unilateral electrographic seizures recorded by chronic ambulatory ICEEG and all were seizure-free at last follow-up after MTL resection; eight of nine continued RNS System treatment. Fifteen patients (62%) had bilateral MTL electrographic seizures, had an MTL resection on the more active side, continued RNS System treatment, and achieved a median clinical seizure reduction of 100% (mean: 90%; range: 50%-100%) at last follow-up, with eight of fifteen seizure-free. For those with more than 1 year of follow-up (N = 21), 15 patients (71%) were seizure-free during the most recent year, including all eight patients with unilateral onsets and 7 of 13 patients (54%) with bilateral onsets. SIGNIFICANCE: Chronic ambulatory ICEEG data provide information about lateralization of MTL seizures and can identify additional patients who may benefit from MTL resection.


Assuntos
Lobectomia Temporal Anterior/métodos , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/cirurgia , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/cirurgia , Lobo Temporal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Eletrocorticografia , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Ambulatorial , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Muscle Nerve ; 53(1): 27-31, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26481860

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: YouTube is an important resource for patients. No study has evaluated the information on peripheral neuropathy disseminated by YouTube videos. In this study, our aim was to perform a systematic review of information on YouTube regarding peripheral neuropathy. METHODS: The Web site (www.youtube.com) was searched between September 19 and 21, 2014, for the terms "neuropathy," "peripheral neuropathy," "diabetic neuropathy," "neuropathy causes," and "neuropathy treatment." RESULTS: Two hundred videos met the inclusion criteria. Healthcare professionals accounted for almost half of the treatment videos (41 of 92; 44.6%), and most came from chiropractors (18 of 41; 43.9%). Alternative medicine was cited most frequently among the treatment discussions (54 of 145, 37.2%), followed by devices (38 of 145, 26.2%), and pharmacological treatments (23 of 145, 15.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the treatment options discussed in the videos were not evidence-based. Caution should be exercised when YouTube videos are used as a patient resource.


Assuntos
Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Gravação em Vídeo , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/diagnóstico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/terapia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Gravação em Vídeo/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA