Carpal tunnel release under wide awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet in hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous shunt.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term hemodialysis patients experience many hand diseases caused by dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) being the most common. For the patients with arteriovenous (AV) shunt, surgical decompression remains challenging because of the contraindications of a tourniquet. A technique called wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT), in which epinephrine provides hemostasis instead of the tourniquet, can be a good option for hemodialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of CTS and related factors in hemodialysis patients, and to establish the efficacy and safety of WALANT on hemodialysis patients with AV shunt. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 275 hemodialysis patients between March 2013 and July 2019. 43 patients were diagnosed with CTS, involving surgical treatment on 70 wrists. We performed mini-open carpal tunnel release using WALANT on the AV shunt arm (defined as the WALANT group), while using lidocaine and a tourniquet on the arm without an AV shunt (defined as the tourniquet group). The operative time, surgical field bleeding (blood loss and hemostasis score), surgical pain (injection pain and tourniquet pain), outcomes, complications, and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The incidence of CTS in hemodialysis patients was 15.6%. Longer dialysis durations were related to higher proportions of patients with CTS. There was no significant difference in blood loss (p=0.184) and hemostasis score (p=0.165) between the two groups. Clinical symptoms improved in all patients, and there were no severe complications. The WALANT group had a significantly longer preparation time of approximately 20minutes, but they had low injection pain and no tourniquet pain. There was also no significant difference in terms of satisfaction levels (p=0.212). DISCUSSION: CTS is a very common disease among hemodialysis patients. WALANT provided sufficient hemostasis without a tourniquet, despite the patients' high bleeding tendency. The technique also had the advantages of low injection pain, no tourniquet pain, and no major complications. In this respect, WALANT can be a good choice for hemodialysis patients with AV shunt. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

A randomized controlled trial of three different local anesthetic methods for minor hand surgery.

Purpose: Hemostasis and local anesthetic injection are essential for minor hand surgeries under local anesthesia (LA). Wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) became popular for achieving hemostasis without a tourniquet. However, a recent study reported that injection is more painful than tourniquet use in minor hand surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to compare three LA methods that differ according to injection and hemostasis, namely, the combination of a tourniquet and buffered lidocaine solution (CTB), WALANT, and conventional LA. Methods: This randomized prospective single-center study included 169 patients who underwent minor hand surgery between 2017 and 2020. We randomly allocated the patients to each group and recorded the pain and anxiety score during the surgery, as well as satisfaction after the surgery. Results: Pure lidocaine injection was significantly more painful than buffered lidocaine and WALANT solution injection (p < 0.001). Local anesthesia injection was significantly more painful than tourniquet use in all groups (p < 0.001). The intraoperative anxiety score was significantly lower in the CTB group than in the conventional LA and WALANT groups (p < 0.001). The satisfaction score was significantly higher in the CTB and WALANT groups than in the conventional LA group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: CTB for minor hand surgery under LA is associated with less injection pain and patient anxiety. The tourniquet is tolerable without much pain and waiting time. Thus, CTB in minor hand surgery is a good alternative to WALANT and conventional LA.

Sensory electrical stimulation for suppression of postural tremor in patients with essential tremor.

Essential tremor is an involuntary trembling of body limbs in people without tremor-related disease. In previous study, suppression of tremor by sensory electrical stimulation was confirmed on the index finger. This study investigates the effect of sensory stimulation on multiple segments and joints of the upper limb. It denotes the observation regarding the effect's continuity after halting the stimulation. 18 patients with essential tremor (8 men and 10 women) participated in this study. The task, "arms stretched forward", was performed and sensory electrical stimulation was applied on four muscles of the upper limb (Flexor Carpi Radialis, Extensor Carpi Radialis, Biceps Brachii, and Triceps Brachii) for 15 seconds. Three 3-D gyro sensors were used to measure the angular velocities of segments (finger, hand, and forearm) and joints (metacarpophalangeal and wrist joints) for three phases of pre-stimulation (Pre), during-stimulation (On), and 5 minute post-stimulation (P5). Three characteristic variables of root-mean-squared angular velocity, peak power, and peak power frequency were derived from the vector sum of the sensor signals. At On phase, RMS velocity was reduced from Pre in all segments and joints while peak power was reduced from Pre in all segments and joints except for forearm segment. Sensory stimulation showed no effect on peak power frequency. All variables at P5 were similar to those at On at all segments and joints. The decrease of peak power of the index finger was noted by 90% during stimulation from that of On phase, which was maintained even after 5 min. The results indicate that sensory stimulation may be an effective clinical method to treat the essential tremor.