Outcomes after endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol-lipiodol ablation of small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Little is known about the standard care of small (<2 cm in diameter) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET). The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical outcomes of small PNET after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ethanol-lipiodol ablation (EUS-ELA). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients who underwent EUS-ELA for PNET were enrolled and were followed for ≥3 years. Treatment efficacy was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: In total, 33 patients who had 40 pathologically confirmed PNET (<2 cm in diameter) were enrolled for final analysis. A total of 63 EUS-ELA sessions were successfully carried out (mean, 1.9 sessions per patient, 1.6 sessions per tumor), which included 40 initial sessions and 23 repeated sessions owing to incomplete ablation. Median actual volume of ethanol-lipiodol mixture injected per session was 1.1 mL (IQR 0.8-1.9 mL). Complete ablation was achieved in 24 of 40 tumors (60%) with one (18 tumors, 45%) or two (24 tumors, 60%) sessions of EUS-ELA. Lipiodol retention within tumor had better treatment outcomes (P = 0.004). Rate of procedure-related adverse events was 3.2%. No malignancy or lymph node metastasis was discovered during a median follow up of 42 months (IQR 39-46 months). CONCLUSIONS: We found that EUS-ELA was a safe and effective alternative option in the management of PNET <2.0 cm in diameter; 60% of patients achieved complete ablation. Lipiodol retention within tumor may be a useful early predictor of treatment effectiveness. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 01902238).

Preliminary report on a new hybrid metal stent for EUS-guided biliary drainage (with videos).

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) may be a feasible and useful alternative in patients with malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP. One of the main limitations of EUS-BD is the lack of devices specifically tailored to this technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a newly developed hybrid metal stent customized for EUS-BD. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: A tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 27 consecutive patients with malignant biliary obstruction who were candidates for alternative techniques for biliary drainage because of failed ERCP were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: EUS-BD with a newly developed hybrid metal stent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The technical and clinical success rates and adverse events, including proximal or distal stent migration and cholangitis. RESULTS: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy was performed in 10 patients, and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy was performed in 17 patients. The technical success rate of EUS-BD with the hybrid metal stent was 100% (27/27), and clinical success was achieved in 96.3% (26/27) of the cases. Adverse events developed in 5 patients (5/27, 18.5%), including a self-limited pneumoperitoneum in 3 patients, minor bleeding in 1 patient, and abdominal pain in 1 patient. During the follow-up period (median 134 days), proximal or distal stent migration was not observed. LIMITATIONS: This study was performed at a single center by a single experienced operator with a relatively small number of patients. CONCLUSION: EUS-BD with a hybrid metal stent is technically feasible and can be an effective treatment for malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP. Hybrid metal stents may be used safely in EUS-BD, and they can prevent stent-related adverse events.

Prospective efficacy and safety study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine with capecitabine combination chemotherapy for borderline-resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To determine the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant gemcitabine/capecitabine followed by surgery for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed LAPC were given 3-6 cycles of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine/capecitabine every 3 weeks. At the end of chemotherapy, patients were restaged and underwent surgery if the disease was not classified as unresectable. Our institutional criteria were used to classify respectability, which was recategorized on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria retroactively. The primary end point was rate of microscopic curative resection. RESULTS: Forty-three eligible patients (18 with borderline resectable disease and 25 with unresectable disease on the basis of NCCN criteria) were enrolled. The radiologic response rate was 18.6%. Grade three or worse adverse events were mainly hand-foot syndrome (11%), and there were no grade four adverse events. Surgery was performed in 17 patients (39.5%); pathologic curative resection (R0) was achieved in 14 patients (32.5%) among total 43 patients, and 82.3% (14/17) among the 17 resected patients. With 43-month follow-up, the median overall was 16.6 months with a median progression-free survival of 10.0 months. Median overall survival was 23.1 months in patients who underwent surgery and 13.2 months in patients who could not complete the surgery (P = .017). CONCLUSION: A subset of patients with borderline or unresectable pancreatic cancer could be performed curative tumor resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Some patients might be benefit on survival from neoadjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection.

EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a fully covered metal stent as the biliary diversion technique for an occluded biliary metal stent after a failed ERCP (with videos).

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) may be the last resort for an occluded biliary metal stent when the ERCP was unsuccessful. OBJECTIVE: Because an EUS-guided biliary drainage has been proposed as an effective alternative for PTBD after a failed ERCP, we conducted this study to determine the feasibility and usefulness of an EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HG) with a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) for an occluded biliary metal stent after a failed ERCP. DESIGN: A case study. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Five patients who had an occluded biliary metal stent inserted after a hilar bilateral metal stent or a combined duodenal and biliary metal stent insertion and for whom reinterventional ERCP was unsuccessful underwent an EUS-HG with an FCSEMS for alternative PTBD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Technical and functional success, procedural complications, reinterventional rate after EUS-HG with an FCSEMS, and short-term stent patency. RESULTS: In all 5 patients, an EUS-HG with an FCSEMS was technically successful. No procedural complications, such as bile peritonitis, cholangitis, and pneumoperitoneum, were observed. Functional success was also 100% (5/5). During the follow-up period (median 152 days, range 64-184 days), no late complications, such as stent migration and occlusion, were observed. Thus, no biliary reintervention was performed during the follow-up period. LIMITATIONS: A small series of patients without a control group. CONCLUSIONS: The EUS-HG with an FCSEMS may be feasible, effective, and an alternative PTBD for an occluded biliary metal stent after a failed ERCP.