Selection Criteria for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Special Emphasis on Laparoscopy as an Efficient Tool.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to assess diagnostic tools implemented in selecting candidates for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with special emphasis on diagnostic laparoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 229 patients underwent laparoscopy between January 2011 and December 2015 with peritoneal carcinomatosis and were analyzed retrospectively to study the role of laparoscopy in selecting patients for CRS and HIPEC. RESULTS: After initial laparoscopy, 101 (44%) of patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with 128 (56%) being aborted. The most prevalent overall exclusion criterion was extensive small bowel disease with a prevalence of 107 (47%) patients. The rate of complete cytoreduction (CCR0 and CCR1) in patients who were deemed initially operable during laparoscopy was 96%. The most prevalent primary tumor site was the stomach with a prevalence of 36,7%. The overall median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score of the excluded patients were 16.8 and 4.6 in the CRS and HIPEC group. Port-site metastasis was 3.1% and bowel perforation rate 3.0%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is a proper selection tool in patients with peritoneal metastases for multimodal treatment. Sensitivity for detecting non-resectable patients is high and the morbidity and mortality low.

Re-operations for early postoperative complications after CRS and HIPEC: indication, timing, procedure, and outcome.

PURPOSE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have become standard of care for many peritoneal malignancies in selected patients. Nevertheless, this aggressive treatment strategy is associated with significant major morbidity. The aim of the present study is to analyze the re-operation rate and clinical outcome following CRS and HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present study, prospectively documented data of 474 consecutive patients treated with CRS and HIPEC between February 2011 and December 2015 in a high-volume certified reference center for peritoneal malignancies in Germany have been retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The re-operation rate was 14.5%. The most frequent reasons for revisional surgery were fascial dehiscence, intraabdominal hemorrhage, and anastomotic leak. Most complications occurred between postoperative day 7 and 9. However, postoperative bleeding was more common within the first 5 days after surgery. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 2.1% for all patients and 10% after revisional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: CRS and HIPEC are associated with an acceptable re-operation rate and low mortality rate. Most frequently, re-operations are performed on 7-9 days after initial surgery due to fascial dehiscence, pancreatitis, or anastomotic leak. Postoperative bleedings are more common within the first 5 days after surgery.

Rare diaphragmatic complications following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: report of two cases.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been proven to be an effective treatment modality for selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. The most common surgical complications after CRS and HIPEC are anastomotic leakage, intestinal obstruction and peripancreatitis. This case report presents two patients with early and late postoperative diaphragmatic hernia after CRS and HIPEC. One patient that initially had pseudomyxoma peritonei complained of persistent chest pain and dyspeptic disorder after peritonectomy and HIPEC and underwent reoperation due to a left diaphragmatic hernia containing the splenocolic flexure. The other patient had gastric cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis and developed anastomotic leakage of the transverse colon anastomosis and pleural empyema. Stripping of the diaphragm is often performed during CRS, sometimes combined with diaphragmatic resection. A herniation through a diaphragmatic defect is rarely diagnosed during either the early or late postoperative period. Direct suture of the defect or closure with synthetic or biological tissue are possible surgical techniques for repair with a good prognosis.