Vitamin D Supplementation Associated to Better Survival in Hospitalized Frail Elderly COVID-19 Patients: The GERIA-COVID Quasi-Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to determine whether bolus vitamin D supplementation taken either regularly over the preceding year or after the diagnosis of COVID-19 was effective in improving survival among hospitalized frail elderly COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID-19 in a geriatric unit were included. Intervention groups were participants regularly supplemented with vitamin D over the preceding year (Group 1), and those supplemented with vitamin D after COVID-19 diagnosis (Group 2). The comparator group involved participants having received no vitamin D supplements (Group 3). Outcomes were 14-day mortality and highest (worst) score on the ordinal scale for clinical improvement (OSCI) measured during COVID-19 acute phase. Potential confounders were age, gender, functional abilities, undernutrition, cancer, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, glycated hemoglobin, number of acute health issues at admission, hospital use of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and pharmacological treatments of respiratory disorders. RESULTS: The three groups (n = 77; mean ± SD, 88 ± 5years; 49% women) were similar at baseline (except for woman proportion, p = 0.02), as were the treatments used for COVID-19. In Group 1 (n = 29), 93.1% of COVID-19 participants survived at day 14, compared to 81.2% survivors in Group 2 (n = 16) (p = 0.33) and 68.7% survivors in Group 3 (n = 32) (p = 0.02). While considering Group 3 as reference (hazard ratio (HR) = 1), the fully-adjusted HR for 14-day mortality was HR = 0.07 (p = 0.017) for Group 1 and HR = 0.37 (p = 0.28) for Group 2. Group 1 had longer survival time than Group 3 (log-rank p = 0.015), although there was no difference between Groups 2 and 3 (log-rank p = 0.32). Group 1, but not Group 2 (p = 0.40), was associated with lower risk of OSCI score ≥5 compared to Group 3 (odds ratio = 0.08, p= 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Regular bolus vitamin D supplementation was associated with less severe COVID-19 and better survival in frail elderly.

Enteroendocrine K Cells Exert Complementary Effects to Control Bone Quality and Mass in Mice.

The involvement of a gut-bone axis in controlling bone physiology has been long suspected, although the exact mechanisms are unclear. We explored whether glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)-producing enteroendocrine K cells were involved in this process. The bone phenotype of transgenic mouse models lacking GIP secretion (GIP-GFP-KI) or enteroendocrine K cells (GIP-DT) was investigated. Mice deficient in GIP secretion exhibited lower bone strength, trabecular bone mass, trabecular number, and cortical thickness, notably due to higher bone resorption. Alterations of microstructure, modifications of bone compositional parameters, represented by lower collagen cross-linking, were also apparent. None of these alterations were observed in GIP-DT mice lacking enteroendocrine K cells, suggesting that another K-cell secretory product acts to counteract GIP action. To assess this, stable analogues of the known K-cell peptide hormones, xenin and GIP, were administered to mature NIH Swiss male mice. Both were capable of modulating bone strength mostly by altering bone microstructure, bone gene expression, and bone compositional parameters. However, the two molecules exhibited opposite actions on bone physiology, with evidence that xenin effects are mediated indirectly, possibly via neural networks. Our data highlight a previously unknown interaction between GIP and xenin, which both moderate gut-bone connectivity. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Vitamin D Supplementation in France in patients with or at risk for osteoporosis: Recent data and new practices.

With intermittent vitamin D supplementation, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels may remain stable only if the dosing interval is shorter than 3 months, the ideal perhaps being about 1 month. Recent data support moderate daily vitamin D doses instead of high intermittent doses, notably in elderly patients prone to falls. The level of evidence is low, however, with no head-to-head comparisons of clinical outcomes such as fractures and falls in groups given identical dosages daily versus intermittently. A challenge to daily vitamin D supplementation in France is the absence of a suitable pharmaceutical formulation. In addition, daily dosing carries a high risk of poor adherence. Until suitable vitamin D3 formulations such as tablets or soft capsules each containing 1000 or 1500 IU become available, we suggest intermittent supplementation according to 2011 GRIO guidelines. Among the available dosages, the lowest should be preferred, with the shortest possible interval, e.g., 50,000 IU monthly rather than 100,000 every two months.

Vitamin D in adults: update on testing and supplementation.

Hypovitaminosis D, a frequent condition in adults, is accompanied by adverse skeletal and non-skeletal events. The objective of the present article was to propose an update on the indications and use of vitamin D testing and supplementation in adults. Among healthy middle-aged adults, the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) target concentration is 50 nmol/L. Natural intakes (sun exposure and diet) are sufficient, and there is no indication for systematic blood test or supplementation. In middle-aged adults who are either sick or dependent or frail, natural intakes are generally insufficient but should be encouraged. In this population, the loading phase of the supplementation targets a 25(OH)D concentration of 75 nmol/L, and the pattern of supplementation (200,000 to 400,000 IU orally over 2 months) depends on the measure of circulating 25(OH)D (which is not reimbursed outside the scope defined by the French national authority for health). In adults over 65 years of age, the loading phase of the supplementation should be systematic and targets a concentration of 75 nmol/L (pattern of 300,000 IU orally over 3 months). Regardless of age, the loading phase should be followed by a long-term maintenance phase of supplementation to maintain the 25(OH)D concentration above the target. A measure of serum 25(OH)D is useful after 9 months of supplementation to adjust the frequency or dosage of supplements if necessary.

Is androgen therapy indicated in men with osteoporosis?

Male osteoporosis is not rare, and its management is a public health issue. The clinical evaluation must include investigations for one or more etiological factors such as hypogonadism, which is found in 5% to 15% of men with osteoporosis. Gradual development of moderate hypogonadism is the most common situation, and the prevalence of hypogonadism increases with advancing age. The wealth of scientific data establishing a major role for sex hormones in growth, bone turnover, and the osteoporotic fracture risk is in striking contrast to the paucity of therapeutic trials. Androgen therapy did not consistently produce bone mass gains, and no data on potential anti-fracture effects are available. Androgen therapy was not associated with significant increases in mortality, prostate disorders, or cardiovascular events, but few data were obtained in patients older than 75 years. In practice, in a male patient with osteoporosis, a diagnosis of marked and persistent hypogonadism requires investigations for treatable causes. In patients younger than 75 years of age, androgen replacement therapy should be started, in collaboration with an endocrinologist. A history of fractures indicates a need for additional osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. The risk/benefit ratio of androgen therapy is unclear in men older than 75 years, in whom a reasonable option consists in combining fall-prevention measures, vitamin D supplementation, and a medication proven to decrease the risk of proximal femoral fractures.

High parathyroid hormone, but not low vitamin D concentrations, expose elderly inpatients to hypertension.

AIM: Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations might contribute to blood pressure (BP) levels. Mixed results in previous literature could be due to the failure to consider both these hormones concurrently, despite their long-known relationship. Our objective was to examine the association of serum intact PTH and 25OHD concentrations with BP levels amongst older inpatients, while accounting for each other. METHODS: The participants were 284 Caucasian older inpatients with no suspicion of primary hyperparathyroidism (mean age 85.87 ± 5.90 years; 65.8% female) admitted to the geriatric acute care unit of Angers University Hospital, France. They were divided into two groups according to the existence of hypertension (i.e. systolic blood pressure [SBP] >140 mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >90 mmHg). Age, sex, numbers of chronic diseases and of drugs taken daily, use of antihypertensive or corticosteroid drugs and of calcium supplements/vitamin D, thyroid-stimulating hormone and albumin concentrations, creatinine clearance, and season tested were used as covariables. RESULTS: Hypertensive participants (n=106) had higher intact PTH concentrations than normotensive patients (P=0.044). There was a positive linear association of BP with intact PTH concentrations (adjusted ß=0.08, P=0.015 for SBP; adjusted ß=0.05, P=0.044 for DBP), but not with vitamin D. Serum intact PTH concentration, unlike 25OHD, was associated with hypertension (adjusted OR 1.01, P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of 25OHD, PTH was associated with hypertension by increasing both SBP and DBP.

Profile of French community-dwelling older adults supplemented with vitamin D: findings and lessons.

INTRODUCTION: The vast majority of older French adults exhibit some degree of hypovitaminosis D. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine the rate and the reasons for vitamin D prescription among older French adult community dwellers. METHODS: Vitamin D supplementation was systematically assessed among 1876 French community dwellers aged ≥ 65 years. Theoretical indications for vitamin D supplementation were collected, ie, the causes of hypovitaminosis D (older age, male gender, kidney failure, undernutrition, polymorbidity) or its clinical complications (vertebral or non-vertebral fractures, gait disturbances, history of falls, muscle weakness, and cognitive impairment). RESULTS: In total, 13.8% of the subjects (n=258) had vitamin D supplementation. They were more often malnourished (P=0.002), exhibited polymorbidity (P<0.001) and muscle weakness (P<0.001), and had a history of vertebral fractures (P<0.001), non-vertebral fractures (P<0.001), and accidental falls (P<0.001). Vitamin D supplementation was explained by the number of complications of hypovitaminosis D (odds ratio [OR]=1.61, P<0.001) including vertebral fractures (adjusted OR=1.49, P=0.007), non-vertebral fractures (adjusted OR=1.74, P=0.026), accidental falls (adjusted OR=1.44, P=0.015), and muscle weakness (adjusted OR=3.96, P<0.001), but not by the number of causes of hypovitaminosis D (P=0.464). CONCLUSION: Even if vitamin D supplementation is selected well for appropriate patients, the rate of supplementation remains insufficient in France, and probably comes too late, ie, at the stage of complications of hypovitaminosis D. These findings should encourage physicians to supplement vitamin D more often and sooner in their elderly patients.