Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epilepsia ; 59(3): 555-561, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29336029

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence and clinical features of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in patients treated with direct brain-responsive stimulation with the RNS System. METHODS: All deaths in patients treated in clinical trials (N = 256) or following U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval (N = 451) through May 5, 2016, were adjudicated for SUDEP. RESULTS: There were 14 deaths among 707 patients (2208 postimplantation years), including 2 possible, 1 probable, and 4 definite SUDEP events. The rate of probable or definite SUDEP was 2.0/1000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-5.2) over 2036 patient stimulation years and 2.3/1000 (95% CI 0.9-5.4) over 2208 patient implant years. Stored electrocorticograms around the time of death were available for 4 patients with probable/definite SUDEP and revealed the following: frequent epileptiform activity ending abruptly (n = 2), no epileptiform activity or seizures (n = 1), and an electrographic and witnessed seizure with cessation of postictal electrocorticography (ECoG) activity associated with apnea and pulselessness (n = 1). SIGNIFICANCE: The SUDEP rate of 2.0/1000 patient stimulation years among patients treated with the RNS System is favorable relative to treatment-resistant epilepsy patients randomized to the placebo arm of add-on drug studies or with seizures after resective surgery. Our findings support that treatments that reduce seizures reduce SUDEP risk and that not all SUDEPs follow seizures.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Morte Súbita/epidemiologia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Epilepsia/fisiopatologia , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Morte Súbita/prevenção & controle , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/mortalidade , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/tendências , Eletrocorticografia/tendências , Epilepsia/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Epilepsia ; 58(6): 994-1004, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28398014

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the seizure-reduction response and safety of mesial temporal lobe (MTL) brain-responsive stimulation in adults with medically intractable partial-onset seizures of mesial temporal lobe origin. METHODS: Subjects with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) were identified from prospective clinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS System, NeuroPace). The seizure reduction over years 2-6 postimplantation was calculated by assessing the seizure frequency compared to a preimplantation baseline. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse events. RESULTS: There were 111 subjects with MTLE; 72% of subjects had bilateral MTL onsets and 28% had unilateral onsets. Subjects had one to four leads placed; only two leads could be connected to the device. Seventy-six subjects had depth leads only, 29 had both depth and strip leads, and 6 had only strip leads. The mean follow-up was 6.1 ± (standard deviation) 2.2 years. The median percent seizure reduction was 70% (last observation carried forward). Twenty-nine percent of subjects experienced at least one seizure-free period of 6 months or longer, and 15% experienced at least one seizure-free period of 1 year or longer. There was no difference in seizure reduction in subjects with and without mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), bilateral MTL onsets, prior resection, prior intracranial monitoring, and prior vagus nerve stimulation. In addition, seizure reduction was not dependent on the location of depth leads relative to the hippocampus. The most frequent serious device-related adverse event was soft tissue implant-site infection (overall rate, including events categorized as device-related, uncertain, or not device-related: 0.03 per implant year, which is not greater than with other neurostimulation devices). SIGNIFICANCE: Brain-responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior MTL resection.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/terapia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Eletroencefalografia , Epilepsias Parciais/fisiopatologia , Epilepsias Parciais/terapia , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Dominância Cerebral/fisiologia , Eletrodos Implantados , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
3.
Epilepsia ; 55(3): 432-41, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24621228

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of responsive stimulation at the seizure focus as an adjunctive therapy to reduce the frequency of seizures in adults with medically intractable partial onset seizures arising from one or two seizure foci. METHODS: Randomized multicenter double-blinded controlled trial of responsive focal cortical stimulation (RNS System). Subjects with medically intractable partial onset seizures from one or two foci were implanted, and 1 month postimplant were randomized 1:1 to active or sham stimulation. After the fifth postimplant month, all subjects received responsive stimulation in an open label period (OLP) to complete 2 years of postimplant follow-up. RESULTS: All 191 subjects were randomized. The percent change in seizures at the end of the blinded period was -37.9% in the active and -17.3% in the sham stimulation group (p = 0.012, Generalized Estimating Equations). The median percent reduction in seizures in the OLP was 44% at 1 year and 53% at 2 years, which represents a progressive and significant improvement with time (p < 0.0001). The serious adverse event rate was not different between subjects receiving active and sham stimulation. Adverse events were consistent with the known risks of an implanted medical device, seizures, and of other epilepsy treatments. There were no adverse effects on neuropsychological function or mood. SIGNIFICANCE: Responsive stimulation to the seizure focus reduced the frequency of partial-onset seizures acutely, showed improving seizure reduction over time, was well tolerated, and was acceptably safe. The RNS System provides an additional treatment option for patients with medically intractable partial-onset seizures.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/tendências , Epilepsias Parciais/diagnóstico , Epilepsias Parciais/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Epilepsias Parciais/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA